menu
Logo
Ohio Football Topic
Topic: This is not football--and fans, tv, recruits gotta love it.
Page: 1 of 1
Monroe Slavin
General User
MS
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121
person
mail
Monroe Slavin
mail
Posted: 10/21/2010 10:53 PM
Oregon destroying UCLA.  UCLA's not very good but Oregon's gone point a minute over their whole schedule this year.

What's key to it?  What feature excites the fans in the stadium (best in college football), tv viewers and RECRUITS?  The total hurry up offense.

It's such a simple thing.  Anyone team can go hurry up.  It's almost entirely a mental approach to the game thing.  But we refuse to take advantge.  We refuse to discombobulate the defense.

I don't get it.

Oregon is light years ahead of everyone--certainly all but a few top teams will give them trouble.  Merely by reason of thinking, of applying a bit more brain power in employing an obvious tactic.

Oregon is playing a different game.  And it works so very well.
Ohio Here
General User
OH
Member Since: 7/6/2010
Post Count: 151
person
mail
Ohio Here
mail
Posted: 10/22/2010 2:14 AM
Recruits might like this too:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1NyaTVUhFQ
Buster
General User
Member Since: 12/21/2007
Post Count: 405
mail
Buster
mail
Posted: 10/22/2010 4:04 AM
Whispers In The Dark wrote:expand_more
Recruits might like this too:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1NyaTVUhFQ


Wow.  A waterfall?
L.C.
General User
LC
Member Since: 9/1/2005
Post Count: 10,584
person
mail
L.C.
mail
Posted: 10/22/2010 7:34 AM
If I recall, over the last few years Ohio has played a few teams with hurry up offenses, and the teams with the hurry up offenses have done no better or worse than any other teams. It still is football, and it still comes down to blocking and tackling. When the hurry up works, it is great. When it doesn't it compounds other problems. If the offense runs hurry up and has a 3 and out a few times in a row, the defense gets no rest, and the time of possession numbers look really ugly.

Solich has spent his time in a system that is very different, a system where the QB looks at the defensive alignment, looks for mis-matches, and audibles to another play a significant portion of the time, a play that hopefully takes advantage of those mis-matches. That is a system that works well, too, especially when you have an intelligent veteran QB that can identify defenses and make good audibles. When you have that, the offense looks easy, and plays just seem to "work" more often.
Scott Woods
General User
SW
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: On the banks of the Ohio, OH
Post Count: 243
person
mail
Scott Woods
mail
Posted: 10/22/2010 8:40 AM
Monroe Slavin, CPA wrote:expand_more
But we refuse to take advantge.  We refuse to discombobulate the defense.

I don't get it.


Someone asked Solich about the no huddle offense earlier this week.  I wasn't sure if you flew in and asked that at the presser or not.  You can have a listen to his answer on BobcatTV.
Pete Chouteau
General User
Member Since: 11/17/2004
Location: You Can't See Me
Post Count: 1,696
mail
Pete Chouteau
mail
Posted: 10/22/2010 10:20 AM
I don't know what Frank said about it... but I'd think a cohesive offensive line would be the top factor in going faster.
Deciduous Forest Cat
General User
DFC
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: OH
Post Count: 4,560
person
mail
Deciduous Forest Cat
mail
Posted: 10/22/2010 10:55 AM
Monroe Slavin, CPA wrote:expand_more
Oregon destroying UCLA.  UCLA's not very good but Oregon's gone point a minute over their whole schedule this year.

What's key to it?  What feature excites the fans in the stadium (best in college football), tv viewers and RECRUITS?  The total hurry up offense.

It's such a simple thing.  Anyone team can go hurry up.  It's almost entirely a mental approach to the game thing.  But we refuse to take advantge.  We refuse to discombobulate the defense.

I don't get it.

Oregon is light years ahead of everyone--certainly all but a few top teams will give them trouble.  Merely by reason of thinking, of applying a bit more brain power in employing an obvious tactic.

Oregon is playing a different game.  And it works so very well.


And when they finally went up against a top flight defense last year in the Rose Bowl, they looked very average. I suspect the same will happen this year.
John C. Wanamaker
General User
Member Since: 1/2/2005
Post Count: 1,103
mail
John C. Wanamaker
mail
Posted: 10/22/2010 10:59 AM
Keep in mind a lot of no-huddles are not really fast running offenses, and require set and not packaged personnel groupings.  The way we run different personnel in and out we would have to change and adapt several things that we do.  Alot of the no-huddle that you see today is more to make the defense show their hand and call the play based on what you are seeing from the sideline, and they still milk most of the 40/25 second play clock.   When we do run a two minute system, ours is more traditional two minute and is fast paced with a purpose, problem is you are somewhat limited in play selection to what you game plan and your personnel packages for the situation.
Athens
General User
A
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Alexandria, VA
Post Count: 5,454
person
mail
Athens
mail
Posted: 10/22/2010 12:03 PM
Monroe Slavin, CPA wrote:expand_more
Oregon destroying UCLA.  UCLA's not very good but Oregon's gone point a minute over their whole schedule this year.

What's key to it?  What feature excites the fans in the stadium (best in college football), tv viewers and RECRUITS?  The total hurry up offense.

It's such a simple thing.  Anyone team can go hurry up.  It's almost entirely a mental approach to the game thing.  But we refuse to take advantge.  We refuse to discombobulate the defense.


There are times when Ohio trips over its own shoelaces on offense. The pistol give you flexibility though I think it makes the offense too complex to run at optimal speed. It is the kind of offense that helped programs like Boise State initially get going before they were able to recruit franchise RB, QB type players. Oregon only beat Arizona State by 11. They'll get challenged against the better teams in the PAC-10.
OrlandoCat
General User
OC
Member Since: 3/15/2005
Post Count: 355
person
mail
OrlandoCat
mail
Posted: 10/22/2010 12:46 PM
Monroe Slavin, CPA wrote:expand_more
Oregon is playing a different game.  And it works so very well against the PAC-10


Fix'd.
Monroe Slavin
General User
MS
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121
person
mail
Monroe Slavin
mail
Posted: 10/22/2010 2:32 PM
PAC-10 seems roundly considered the best conference this year...at least a pretty darn good one.  Yeah, those are amazing (Nike) facilities they have and we can't match that.  But...

I'm not saying that we should run hurry-up all the time.  And you can come up with all the reasons you want that we aren't equipped for it or shouldn't run it.

But if we don't have it as a tool to use once in a while, then we are not even considering what could be a very important weapon.

Let''s take a rough analogy.  Suppose we had a punter had abilities and skills which could bring us advantage. So, we let him free to fake punt and run when circumstances arose which indicated that change of pace might be effective.  Hmm, someone remarked last week the 'air went out of the 'kron sidelines when we did that successfully last week.' 

To me, the hurry-up can be physically and mentally devastating.  I view it, in fact (or in my overactive mind), as a way to charge up our defense....to give our team a feeling that we know and the other side doesn't.

It is bad business practice to view how devastating Oregon's offense is and to not incorporate some of that.

I mean it's not as if teams found the pistol and decided that was effective and that they would incorporate that.


Oh, about the remark that our 2-minute offense is well-planned and effective--You're kidding, right?
Monroe Slavin
General User
MS
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121
person
mail
Monroe Slavin
mail
Posted: 10/22/2010 4:22 PM
Oh.  The Really Big Thing.

I can only recall one time in my fairly deep attendance at OUr games and viewing and listening to them that Peden got LOUD.  Last year in the last home game (Temple, I think).  It didn't even look like Peden was that crowded, onnaccounta bad/cold/rain-threatening weather.  But, finally some emotion expressed.

We have 99% apathy at Peden.  Remember the first drive by BG a few weeks back when we held them with no points after a first down via turnover at our 3.  A real football crowd would've blown the doors off the place.  It was game over.  You coulda read a book almost at Peden.  There is no home field advantage all at Peden--not in any way that there should be.

Maybe if we went hurry-up our fans would get excited.



Oh--crowd finally got into it at the end of the Peden upset of Pitt, too.  This shouldn't be a twice a decade thing.
Chimokee
General User
C
Member Since: 8/13/2006
Post Count: 29
person
mail
Chimokee
mail
Posted: 10/23/2010 8:00 PM
Monroe Slavin, CPA wrote:expand_more
Oh. The Really Big Thing.

I can only recall one time in my fairly deep attendance at OUr games and viewing and listening to them that Peden got LOUD. Last year in the last home game (Temple, I think). It didn't even look like Peden was that crowded, onnaccounta bad/cold/rain-threatening weather. But, finally some emotion expressed.

We have 99% apathy at Peden. Remember the first drive by BG a few weeks back when we held them with no points after a first down via turnover at our 3. A real football crowd would've blown the doors off the place. It was game over. You coulda read a book almost at Peden. There is no home field advantage all at Peden--not in any way that there should be.

Maybe if we went hurry-up our fans would get excited.



Oh--crowd finally got into it at the end of the Peden upset of Pitt, too. This shouldn't be a twice a decade thing.
Everyone will be running the hurry-up next year with the same success as Oregon.
Monroe Slavin
General User
MS
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121
person
mail
Monroe Slavin
mail
Posted: 10/23/2010 8:18 PM
Intelligent response. Definitely goes to whether or not it would be wise for us to use the hurry up occasionally.

Or we could be satisfied with being just among the better teams in the MAC--not much else--and a fan base which, well, there is no fan base.  See my post above about lack of excitement around the 'Cats and the passivity of the fans in Peden.  If we do end up in a bowl west of the Mississippi, will we have 500 or 600 fans there?

What do you have that'll excite the fans and give us national prominence, chimney?
Chimokee
General User
C
Member Since: 8/13/2006
Post Count: 29
person
mail
Chimokee
mail
Posted: 10/23/2010 8:47 PM
Monroe Slavin, CPA wrote:expand_more
Intelligent response. Definitely goes to whether or not it would be wise for us to use the hurry up occasionally.

Or we could be satisfied with being just among the better teams in the MAC--not much else--and a fan base which, well, there is no fan base. See my post above about lack of excitement around the 'Cats and the passivity of the fans in Peden. If we do end up in a bowl west of the Mississippi, will we have 500 or 600 fans there?

What do you have that'll excite the fans and give us national prominence, chimney?
Exciting the fan base is definitely needed. My point was that the hurry-up isn't the be-all, end-all. I agree it would be nice to have in OUr arsenal and to use it on occasion. It's been done many times before by many teams. Props to Oregon for what they do with it. They have the players to run it well. Regardless of how it's done, winning regular season games and bowl games is the best way to excite the fan base. If that won't do it, nothing will.
LoganElm_grad09
General User
LE09
Member Since: 9/9/2010
Location: South Bloomingville, OH
Post Count: 934
person
mail
LoganElm_grad09
mail
Posted: 10/24/2010 10:33 AM
Chimokee wrote:expand_more
Intelligent response. Definitely goes to whether or not it would be wise for us to use the hurry up occasionally.

Or we could be satisfied with being just among the better teams in the MAC--not much else--and a fan base which, well, there is no fan base. See my post above about lack of excitement around the 'Cats and the passivity of the fans in Peden. If we do end up in a bowl west of the Mississippi, will we have 500 or 600 fans there?

What do you have that'll excite the fans and give us national prominence, chimney?


Exciting the fan base is definitely needed. My point was that the hurry-up isn't the be-all, end-all. I agree it would be nice to have in OUr arsenal and to use it on occasion. It's been done many times before by many teams. Props to Oregon for what they do with it. They have the players to run it well. Regardless of how it's done, winning regular season games and bowl games is the best way to excite the fan base. If that won't do it, nothing will.


I agree with Chimney; winning is the key.  Look at the crowd at the Wisconsin/Ohio State game, the Wisconsin/Iowa game, and when it comes around the Iowa/OSU game.  I highly doubt Iowa and Wisconsin run a no-huddle like Oregon, yet those people are absolutely nuts.

Winning is key.  Last year we saw that we were on our way, but the last two games shown us how far we had to go.  We win out, win the MAC and a bowl and go 11-3, you'll see more excitement.  Win next season, the crowd gets better.
Monroe Slavin
General User
MS
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121
person
mail
Monroe Slavin
mail
Posted: 10/24/2010 2:09 PM
Winning EARLY is the key.  Over the last five yars we are clearly a winning program.  Looks like our third bowl game in 5 years is coming.  The problem is in each of the bowl years we start off with losing records over the first six or so games.  So, we have no chance to excite the 'casual' fan, to get them attached to the program in a BIG, EXCITED way.  They see that we are 2-4 or 3-3 and figure, oh well, another season of lousy Ohio football.

Again, only two instances of genuinely involved Ohio fans over the the last 12-20 years were the end of the Pitt game and the last  home game last year.  Otherwise, Peden is, sadly--very sadly--like a library.

So, the hurry-up is a way to rouse the corwd, rouse the team and a strategic tactic to get over on the opposition.


There's every reason that we should have given columbus a better tussle and should be 7-1 right now.  That might excite even the casual Ohio fan.

Remember how great and exciting the Georgetown win was.  That.
Scott Woods
General User
SW
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: On the banks of the Ohio, OH
Post Count: 243
person
mail
Scott Woods
mail
Posted: 10/24/2010 9:57 PM
I'm glad you are aiming big Slavin.  I'd just love to see a MAC title in football for the first time since ... well, before I was born.  Basketball doesn't have as far to go with fan support as there have been a few MAC titles in basketball since the 60's.

We started by winning the East a couple of times and have been to a couple of bowls.  It's time to start winning the MAC and some bowls and then I'll worry about the style we use winning.  But at this point, let's just win!
Athens
General User
A
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Alexandria, VA
Post Count: 5,454
person
mail
Athens
mail
Posted: 10/24/2010 10:21 PM
Scott Woods wrote:expand_more
I'm glad you are aiming big Slavin.  I'd just love to see a MAC title in football for the first time since ... well, before I was born.  Basketball doesn't have as far to go with fan support as there have been a few MAC titles in basketball since the 60's.

We started by winning the East a couple of times and have been to a couple of bowls.  It's time to start winning the MAC and some bowls and then I'll worry about the style we use winning.  But at this point, let's just win!


Basketball fan support hasn't been that great either for what most fans would like to see, a 10,000 a game average with major donors coming out to fund a basketball practice facility. Ohio football would have more respect if it played more of a national schedule year in and out. A low level schedule with WAC and SBC teams doesn't equal national player.
Showing Messages: 1 - 19 of 19
MAC News Links
Tuesday, May 12, 2026



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)