I wish there were a shorter answer to that question. I apologize for the length of my reply, but reading this may teach you a little more about football in the MWC than you already know.
Sadly, yes that is the case. A few years ago the Mountain West Conference got into a little tiff with ESPN about scheduling and game times. The teams in the MWC (mainly BYU) were upset about football games being scheduled on Thursday and Friday nights, and basketball games being scheduled for as late as 10:00pm. So the powers that be in the MWC got together and decided to form their own TV network, the first conference in the NCAA to do so.
The Mtn. as it is called has been a HUGE disappointment and frustration to all teams in the MWC. The Mtn. was supposed to provide nationwide airtime for all teams, better game days and times, as well as more exposure for recruiting. What it HAS been is a major letdown. The Mtn. channel is not carried on all major cable networks, and has partnered with CBSC(CBS College Sports) and Versus in order to broadcast its bigger games on a wider scale. The problem is, NOBODY WATCHES THOSE CHANNELS! Quick, can you tell me what channel CBSC is on your channel list? I'm sure you can't. Nobody can. So even the biggest games of the season, such as TCU @ Utah, aren't seen by nearly as many people as they would be if they would have stayed with ESPN.
Another major problem with The Mtn. channel is the fact that MWC schools get absolutely no love from ESPN, the premier sports channel in the country. Have you noticed how much talk and air time Boise State has received on ESPN lately? That's because Boise is in the WAC, and the WAC is still in broadcast partnership with ESPN. So talking about Boise as the premier non-BCS school is just ESPN's way of promoting their product, even though everybody knows Utah was the FIRST team to bust the BCS, and has arguably a bigger BCS win against Alabama than Boise's win over Oklahoma. Great for Boise State, horrible for TCU and Utah.
Besides the obvious benefits the Utes will receive from leaving the MWC for the Pac-12, one that a lot of people don't realize is the monetary aspect of it. Sure guaranteed access to the BCS and an actual shot at a National Championship are great, but what may be even better for Utah is the monetary asepct of the move. Utah, along with all other MWC teams, receive just $1.2 million per year from The Mtn. TV deal. Teams in the Pac-10 currently receive between $7 and 10 million per year. Teams in the SEC receive even more than that. So financially, the move will be a HUGE positive for the school.
People not from Utah and not familiar with The Mtn. TV situation often ask the question of 'Why is BYU leaving the Mountain West Conference to go Independent in football next year?'. The answer is its all about the $$. BYU signed a new TV deal to get back on to ESPN next year and will now make roughly between $4 and 7 million per year. The MWC has a lot of street cred as a non-BCS league, but financially the conference is killing its programs. As conferences start to make more and more money from new TV contracts, teams in the MWC will slowly get further and further behind. BYU made a move that they had to make in order to keep up with in-state rival Utah and other big time programs that they like to compare themselves to.
Anyway, sorry about the long answer. The Mountain West Conference is an interesting entity. If you have CBSC on your cable or satelite provider, I urge you to tune in next Saturday afternoon (2:30pm central kick off) to the TCU/Utah game. It will be a GREAT game, probably an all-timer. If you can't watch, DVR it and watch it later. You won't regret it.
Last Edited: 10/28/2010 3:59:24 PM by goutes27