Do you seriously think this team deserves to go to a bowl game after the patsy wins they've racked up? I'm not asking if we should accept a bid if invited (we should), but do we really deserve it with 7 bad FBS wins (loosely) and 1 bad FCS win? I would say no. Sorry.
So Temple was a Patsy win...the team that was picked to go win it this year? Miami is a patsy team when they blew out Temple worse than we did with a 3rd string QB? We didn't just beat patsy teams, we annihilated them. In the last 7 games before this we racked up somewhere between 210 and 230 points. Did you see that happening. I don't care if we have beaten patsy teams. We are 8-4, we are bowl eligible. If we are eligible then we clearly deserve to be there.
I guess the first question would be do you think an 8-4 record in the MAC is comparable to 8-4 in the Big 10, SEC or any other major conference?
I love football but having 70 some teams being in a bowl game is a joke!
One of the posters on one of these threads calls for a playoff and the MAC having an automatic spot. For crying out loud, name one team the past 50 years from the MAC who was a legitimate National Championship team.
The Bobcats overcame a great deal of adversity this year including loosing our two top players and should be commended for having a solid season overall. The point that several of us are trying to make is whether or not the MAC is a legtimate conference to compete for a National Championship and whether there are too many bowls games, many of which have more empty seats that seats that are filled.
If we can't financially afford to host Northwestern and Virginia Tech in our own stadium and if we can't get better attendance, then it is reasonable to have a discussion of whether Ohio/MAC should stay Division 1 in football?
As the Love has stated, unless we can get a better home schedule and at least have some second tier Big 10 teams visit Peden, the the MAC will always have a minor league image and a large percentage of Ohio Students will continue to not attend as many games as we would hope.
Some of the before mentioned points are things we can control. Other factors that we can't control is the location or access to attending a game at Peden. That impacts recruiting visits, parents/recruits factoring how their parents can attend from a far distance and the logistics of major conference teams flying into Columbus and then bussing down to Athens.
It is not an easy answer, but my main point is that some of us need to be more realistic about what a 7 or 8 win season in the MAC means compared to the same number of wins in a major conference.
In terms of the BCS, the answer I think is pretty simple. You take the top four teams in the current system and you rotate the semi-finals within the current bowl structure and then have the National Championship game two weeks later. For example, one year the winners of the Rose (1 vs 4) plays the winner of the (Orange Bowl 2 vs 3). The next year the Sugar and Fiesta hosts the semi-finals. This enables the current major bowls to be maintained and most years would allow the Boise States or TCU to have an opportunity. If there is a once in a lifetime MAC team that can run the table including playing a very strong out of conference schedule that might include a major upset, then possibly that team could be part of the equation.
My hope this season was for Ohio to win the MAC, something we have not done since 1968. I believe we are the only team (other than Temple of course) who has not won the title since then. Many of us yesterday felt that if we can't even earn a berth in the league championship game, then what is the point heading to a third tier bowl and possibly loosing money. As I stated before, the argument of having the 15 extra practices is not that strong of an argument.
Last Edited: 11/27/2010 7:56:54 AM by Bobcat Grad 86