Anorris -- I'm frustrated by how he left, not that he left. Most of my Connecticut based buddies feel the same.
Fair enough -- and I'm not saying you shouldn't be, all I'm saying is it seems he at least stuck around for the game, which many coaches can't be bothered to do anymore. I agree a week later would've made a world of difference in the reception of his decision, but I'm not sure he wouldn't have been passed over had he waited.
It is a tough thing -- I agree with those who think a coach should finish the season, then look for a job, but the other schools simply won't wait to search for their next coach. The NCAA can't do anything about it, really (John is spot on when he mentions restraint of trade, etc.).
The only folks who could do something would be the institutions, on their own, writing penalty clauses into contracts if a coach leaves prior to a bowl game (the official "end" of a season). This opens another whole can of worms, as likely higher-money schools would just add that penalty to their buyout amounts and grab them up anyhow. Plus, if a school utilized such a clause in their contracts, then hired someone away before that school's bowl, they don't end up looking good. It is a messy situation, for sure.
Maybe I'm just biased, cuz I really like Edsall.