That hard 225 you played at is now a hard 285. By softer, I do no necessarily mean you or I were a pillow, but that the impact we carried and absorbed was less.
I honestly believe the rules being applied over time are not an attempt to avoid litigation, but an attempt to avoid permanent incapacity.
We are in an era when football players will tell you they don't want their children to play football. That is an indication that the game has evolved in an undesirable fashion.
Pete, a few observations...
I'm not sure much has changed re concerns about kids playing football. I heard that back when i was playing all those many moons ago. In addition, some kids tried playing football, quickly decided they didn't like the contact and quit. Herewith a related, fond memory: In the spring of my 8th grade year, Mom, Dad and I were sitting around the kitchen table. Subject: where Mike would go to HS.
"I wish you would go to St. Peter's," said Mom.
"St. Pete's doesn't have a football team," I replied.
"I think we should let Mike make up his own mind," said Dad. End of discussion.
I don't know if there are comprehensive stats comparing frequency of football injuries at both the HS and collegiate levels going back over the decades. We do know that football was decidedly dangerous in the early years of the 20th century with numerous deaths, and concerns led to banning the "flying wedge." My impression is that from the 1960s onward the frequency hasn't changed all that much, if at all. In my senior season alone, our team lost 4 starters to season-ending injuries - two knees, broken arm and the aforementioned compound thigh fracture. Another starter suffered two concussions but didn't miss any games (perhaps should have).
I've read reports of studies with conflicting conclusions re artiicial turf and injury frequency, but I do believe that artificial turf has increased frequency of injuries to feet, ankles, knees and heads. I remember the first time I ran a lot on artiticial turf. It was an indoor soccer game. Afterward my knees felt like they had the consistency of jello.
Helmets. Someone posted here that a return to leather helmets might be worth considering. Never wore one but I'll bet that you, like me, have seen footage from the era when they were worn. The tackling seemed less fearsome and more like tackling in rugby.
I've held and inspected today's helmets. I don't see any appreciable difference between them and the ones we wore in the '60s. Facemasks certainly have evolved. Most of us wore just two connected bars.
All in all, as you now know, I'd prefer no additional restrictions on blocking and tackling.
Hoping that our paths cross again this coming season.