menu
Logo
Ohio Football Topic
Topic: Now thats a financial hit!
Page: 1 of 1
sargentfan
General User
S
Member Since: 3/17/2005
Post Count: 917
person
mail
sargentfan
mail
Posted: 3/3/2011 10:52 AM
Wonder how bad the press would be if we took a $1.8 million dollar hit like UConn just did for their Feista Bowl appearance? 
Alan Swank
General User
AS
Member Since: 12/12/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 7,376
person
mail
Alan Swank
mail
Posted: 3/3/2011 3:08 PM
http://www.nbcconnecticut.com/blogs/dog-house/Breaking-Down-18M-Bowl-Loss-117325378.html

I especially like the 8th and 9th paragraphs.  Sounds like every school's pr machine must have bought the same manual.
Last Edited: 3/3/2011 3:10:01 PM by Alan Swank
Terry Lee
General User
TL
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 49
person
mail
Terry Lee
mail
Posted: 3/3/2011 3:48 PM

If they get 3.8M from the conference didn't they make 2M?

Last Edited: 3/3/2011 3:48:51 PM by Terry Lee
Alan Swank
General User
AS
Member Since: 12/12/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 7,376
person
mail
Alan Swank
mail
Posted: 3/3/2011 4:14 PM
Terry Lee wrote:expand_more

If they get 3.8M from the conference didn't they make 2M?



That was my initial reaction too Terry then I reread that paragraph.

The Post also reports that UConn will receive $3.8 million from the Big East later this year as "each football-playing school in the league will receive that amount as its cut from bowl and television revenue."

My take on that is that is their share of all the bowl revenue and all of the tv revenue for the entire conference.  Tough to get a true net as to how much of that 3.8 is their share of the Fiesta Bowl payout.

Ohio69
General User
O69
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 3,124
person
mail
Ohio69
mail
Posted: 3/3/2011 5:14 PM
I eagerly await news of the Uconn teach in and pictures of half naked, masked professors.....

Uconn didn't lose a dime.  Just like I won't lose money on my next vacation.  It simply decided to spend money going to a bowl game. 
Ted Thompson
Administrator
Member Since: 11/11/2004
Location: MAC Play
Post Count: 7,950
mail
Ted Thompson
mail
Posted: 3/3/2011 10:20 PM
Terry Lee wrote:expand_more

If they get 3.8M from the conference didn't they make 2M?



Yeah, not to mention the fact that it's not like they have this $1.8M expense every year. Part of the cost of doing business to get that $3.8 annual payout. But don't let the facts get into the way of a good headline. Heck, Florida "lost" $1M one of the years it won a National Championship.
Piney
General User
P
Member Since: 2/3/2005
Location: Avon Lake, OH
Post Count: 135
person
mail
Piney
mail
Posted: 3/4/2011 10:06 AM
Terry Lee wrote:expand_more

If they get 3.8M from the conference didn't they make 2M?



The 1.8 million is the loss, not their expenses. Per the article they had to fork over $2.9 million just to cover their unsold allotment of tickets. Throw in travel costs and they were well over the $3.8 million they got from their conference's share.
Ted Thompson
Administrator
Member Since: 11/11/2004
Location: MAC Play
Post Count: 7,950
mail
Ted Thompson
mail
Posted: 3/4/2011 10:36 AM
Piney wrote:expand_more

If they get 3.8M from the conference didn't they make 2M?



The 1.8 million is the loss, not their expenses. Per the article they had to fork over $2.9 million just to cover their unsold allotment of tickets. Throw in travel costs and they were well over the $3.8 million they got from their conference's share.


The $1.8M is their loss on the Bowl game. They had expenses of $4.3M and were given $2.5M from the conference for appearing in the game. So they lost $1.8M on the game. But they still get $3.8M payment which is their share of revenues from Big East Bowl games and TV.
oubobcatjohn
General User
O
Member Since: 1/1/2005
Post Count: 838
person
mail
oubobcatjohn
mail
Posted: 3/4/2011 11:31 PM
Scary dilema for the MAC. You wonder If Ohio were 13-0 and ranked in top 10.  Yes it would be a big hit on a financial side, but having one magical season in 100 years of football would be worth it. You could always schedule money bag games and just take the cash for a few years.  For the MAC it would be an historic event.  UConn football atleast got there. 10 years ago they were 1-AA and like Boise St they reached a BCS bowl.  
Athens
General User
A
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Alexandria, VA
Post Count: 5,454
person
mail
Athens
mail
Posted: 3/5/2011 9:41 AM
oubobcatjohn wrote:expand_more
Scary dilema for the MAC. You wonder If Ohio were 13-0 and ranked in top 10.  Yes it would be a big hit on a financial side, but having one magical season in 100 years of football would be worth it. You could always schedule money bag games and just take the cash for a few years.  For the MAC it would be an historic event.  UConn football atleast got there. 10 years ago they were 1-AA and like Boise St they reached a BCS bowl.  


It is a scary delima for a lot of schools. The BCS bowl system was designed to place mega football schools with 75,000+ fanbases in bowl games. Its only like the top 30 largest fanbases in the country that have the ability to travel big to any BCS bowl regardless of location. Adding a couple of BCS bowls back east would solve the problem. It would also solve the problem of schools being left out of the BCS in the top 12 of the standings. What is there, 5 BCS bowls right now? Move to 6 or 7 games and give the non-BCS schools an automatic qualifier to the highest placing non-BCS team. 
Pataskala
General User
P
Member Since: 7/8/2010
Location: At least six feet away from anybody else
Post Count: 9,465
person
mail
Pataskala
mail
Posted: 3/5/2011 9:54 AM
oubobcatjohn wrote:expand_more
Scary dilema for the MAC. You wonder If Ohio were 13-0 and ranked in top 10.  Yes it would be a big hit on a financial side, but having one magical season in 100 years of football would be worth it. You could always schedule money bag games and just take the cash for a few years.  For the MAC it would be an historic event.  UConn football atleast got there. 10 years ago they were 1-AA and like Boise St they reached a BCS bowl.  


It helped UConn to have a basketball connection to THE WORST auto qualifier in football, the Big Least.  Their being in the Fiesta last season just shows the inequity in conferences having auto tie-ins for the big money bowls.  They got their heads handed to them, and rightfully so.  If they were in any other AQ conference, they would've gone to a bowl with a much smaller payout. 

OU needs to beef up the schedule in order to do what Boise and TCU have done.  Which means more Bix 6 schools. They don't need to have three on the schedule like Fiami, BSU and WMU are doing.  Beating three is asking too much; it's a good way to wind up 6-6 at best.  But having two with one or two decent non-AQs makes 13-0 or even 12-1 a lot more attractive in the BCS standings.  Going 13-0 against next year's soft schedule might not even get the Cats in the Top 25.
Showing Messages: 1 - 11 of 11
MAC News Links
Monday, May 11, 2026



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)