menu
Logo
Ohio Football Topic
Topic: So we are moving towards Oregon's offense?
Page: 1 of 1
Ohio69
General User
O69
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 3,124
person
mail
Ohio69
mail
Posted: 4/7/2011 10:25 AM
Sounds like it, eh?  No huddle.  Run plays quickly.  Etc.
Last Edited: 4/7/2011 10:25:51 AM by Ohio69
Doc Bobcat
General User
DB
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 4,421
person
mail
Doc Bobcat
mail
Posted: 4/7/2011 10:30 AM
Why not?
KyleWvr13
General User
Member Since: 11/10/2010
Location: Pottstown, PA
Post Count: 503
mail
KyleWvr13
mail
Posted: 4/7/2011 10:50 AM
I hope we can pull it off.  A hurry-up offense takes a lot of skill and practice on the players and the coaches to do it right.
Jeff McKinney
Moderator
JM
Member Since: 11/12/2004
Post Count: 6,163
person
mail
Jeff McKinney
mail
Posted: 4/7/2011 1:55 PM
According to an article posted today, Ball State is trying to do the same thing.
Paul Graham
General User
Member Since: 1/18/2005
Location: The Plains, OH
Post Count: 1,424
mail
Paul Graham
mail
Posted: 4/7/2011 4:09 PM
I'm glad we are trying this out. We have some serious game-breakers out on the field with Brazill, Bates and others. Doing what we can to keep the defense on their heels should seriously open things up for these guys.

Plus, (as long as we are winning) it's a can't miss with casual fans. If it's fun to watch, maybe more people will come out to Peden!
Last Edited: 4/7/2011 4:09:51 PM by Paul Graham
Bcat2
General User
B2
Member Since: 7/6/2010
Post Count: 4,295
person
mail
Bcat2
mail
Posted: 4/7/2011 5:29 PM
Doc Bobcat wrote:expand_more
Why not?
Football simple game really. "Run the ball, stop the run, win the game." This season with a new defensive front Ohio's offense will be key to winning T.O.P. I am for anything that will create first downs or touchdowns. The offense will have to win some tougher games than last season. Given some special plays from the special teams This season might be fun to watch. My point, however does not matter, the offense needs to control the ball and with good special teams win the socalled "battle of field position."
Doc Bobcat
General User
DB
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 4,421
person
mail
Doc Bobcat
mail
Posted: 4/7/2011 5:46 PM
Bcat2 wrote:expand_more
Why not?


Football simple game really. "Run the ball, stop the run, win the game." This season with a new defensive front Ohio's offense will be key to winning T.O.P. I am for anything that will create first downs or touchdowns. The offense will have to win some tougher games than last season. Given some special plays from the special teams This season might be fun to watch. My point, however does not matter, the offense needs to control the ball and with good special teams win the socalled "battle of field position."


I have a limited view of no huddles.....but I am an old fart so I have viewed a few....I guess no huddle experience is a relative term.

From what I've seen the no huddle confuses the D  and puts certain  D players either out of position or not ready to make the play.

The first team that I ever saw in person that did this was an Upper Arlington high school team in the 60's who simply was ready to play and the defense wasn't.

To me the best thing that the no huddle brings in my  mind is the defense being not ready or extremely befuddled.

Wyoming did this to us when they beat us at Peden a few years ago.....we couldn't get the players that we wanted on the field.
Last Edited: 4/7/2011 5:46:51 PM by Doc Bobcat
The Optimist
General User
Member Since: 3/16/2007
Location: CLE
Post Count: 5,611
mail
The Optimist
mail
Posted: 4/7/2011 5:53 PM
I read that article and got real excited for football season.  We have the players to do this.
stout76
General User
S76
Member Since: 12/22/2005
Post Count: 79
person
mail
stout76
mail
Posted: 4/7/2011 6:34 PM
I think I heard Urban Meyer call it the "shred" offense.
Pataskala
General User
P
Member Since: 7/8/2010
Location: At least six feet away from anybody else
Post Count: 9,465
person
mail
Pataskala
mail
Posted: 4/7/2011 8:37 PM
I hope they can pull it off.  But even if they can't, it'll be great for the D.  No huddle has given us problems during recent seasons, and if the D can get used to defending it, they'll be more effective.
cc-cat
General User
C
Member Since: 4/5/2006
Location: matthews, NC
Post Count: 4,016
person
mail
cc-cat
mail
Posted: 4/7/2011 8:55 PM
Does this mean Miami will be faking injuries?
Mike Johnson
General User
Member Since: 11/11/2004
Location: North Canton, OH
Post Count: 1,759
mail
Mike Johnson
mail
Posted: 4/7/2011 9:46 PM
Let's see...The spread is spreading.  As has the wildcat (nee single wing) and as did the triple-option, wishbone, veer, winged T, T,   Yet we still see plenty of low-scoring games.  So my question is: how have total points per 1-A game changed over, say, the last 25 seasons?

Are we seeing appreciably more points scored per game?  Or not? 

A bobcatattack stats maven likely can unearth the answer with a few savvy clicks. 
Jughead
General User
Member Since: 7/6/2010
Location: Chillicothe, OH
Post Count: 478
mail
Jughead
mail
Posted: 4/8/2011 12:46 AM
A no huddle offense does not necessarily mean that we will be running a play every 15 seconds.  It means that we will set up at the line immediately after the previous offensive play, not allowing the defense to get substitutions on the field.   Technically, we could set up on the line and wait 30-35 seconds before we snap the ball.
Football Jim
General User
FJ
Member Since: 1/16/2005
Post Count: 177
person
mail
Football Jim
mail
Posted: 4/8/2011 1:24 AM
I think this would be a great move IF the players and coaches can execute the plays smoothly. One of the things that bothered me a bit about the Bobcats the past couple of years was the plodding slow pace of the team between snaps. I think a hurry up will keep the players more intense.
Monroe Slavin
General User
MS
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121
person
mail
Monroe Slavin
mail
Posted: 4/8/2011 3:44 AM
I guess the tide done turned.  Against my fervent advocacy of doing the hurry-up at least some of the time, I was told that we don't have the right players for that, that it's a gimmick, that the coaches know what they're doing and they're not doing that, etc, etc.  Now you all grab zactly what I was talkin' about--put the defense on the run, off balance.
Bobcatzblitz
General User
B
Member Since: 7/21/2010
Post Count: 1,777
person
mail
Bobcatzblitz
mail
Posted: 4/8/2011 10:24 AM
Ran into Phil Bates today while he was jogging on west union..not a man gawker but Whoa nelly...he is a freak of nature..I once met Boo Jackson and Shaq O'Neal and the same thing popped into my mind..I would not want to make these guys mad! Bates reminds me of the he-man figurines I had as a child but bigger and faster.
Athens
General User
A
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Alexandria, VA
Post Count: 5,454
person
mail
Athens
mail
Posted: 4/8/2011 4:27 PM
Football Jim wrote:expand_more
I think this would be a great move IF the players and coaches can execute the plays smoothly. One of the things that bothered me a bit about the Bobcats the past couple of years was the plodding slow pace of the team between snaps. I think a hurry up will keep the players more intense.


To me, its been since the begining of time as a Bobcat fan that I notably slower execution than the opponents has bothered me and along with that the always over complicated play book. We are at the point, at least in reagards to MAC competition that we are capable of running the opponent off the field on the basis of talent alone. No longer to we have to rely on gimmick schemes to move the ball down field.
Deciduous Forest Cat
General User
DFC
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: OH
Post Count: 4,560
person
mail
Deciduous Forest Cat
mail
Posted: 4/8/2011 8:50 PM
It must be noted that when Oregon has gone up against top-flight defenses in bowl games, they have met with very stiff resistance. Noticed that with the option... some teams just knew how to defend it, others looked befuddled for 60 minutes and looked like they had concrete shoes.
Cats-22
General User
C22
Member Since: 9/30/2006
Post Count: 370
person
mail
Cats-22
mail
Posted: 4/8/2011 9:42 PM
Deciduous Forest Cat wrote:expand_more
It must be noted that when Oregon has gone up against top-flight defenses in bowl games, they have met with very stiff resistance. Noticed that with the option... some teams just knew how to defend it, others looked befuddled for 60 minutes and looked like they had concrete shoes.


This was always the argument against Tom Osborne and the option at Nebraska.  Teams weren't prepared for it during the season, so it worked -- but given six weeks of bowl prep defenses could learn to shut it down.  Of course, then NU won three championships in the 90s.  It's really about having a good scheme...and the best players.
Turney13
General User
T13
Member Since: 7/28/2010
Post Count: 364
person
mail
Turney13
mail
Posted: 4/9/2011 9:11 AM
Monroe Slavin wrote:expand_more
I guess the tide done turned.  Against my fervent advocacy of doing the hurry-up at least some of the time, I was told that we don't have the right players for that, that it's a gimmick, that the coaches know what they're doing and they're not doing that, etc, etc.  Now you all grab zactly what I was talkin' about--put the defense on the run, off balance.


There is a huge difference between implementing a new offense in spring ball than what you were suggesting - trying to change the offensive scheme in between week 4 and week 5.
cc-cat
General User
C
Member Since: 4/5/2006
Location: matthews, NC
Post Count: 4,016
person
mail
cc-cat
mail
Posted: 4/9/2011 11:18 AM
Deciduous Forest Cat wrote:expand_more
It must be noted that when Oregon has gone up against top-flight defenses in bowl games, they have met with very stiff resistance.


And that should concern us because.....
Last Edited: 4/9/2011 11:19:13 AM by cc-cat
Monroe Slavin
General User
MS
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121
person
mail
Monroe Slavin
mail
Posted: 4/9/2011 7:45 PM
Uncle Wes makes a good point about the slowness of our offense as we lined up at scrimmage in years past.  We looked so uncertain and unready so often.  I was not advocating that we wholesale go to the hurry-up last year.  I was merely advocating that we use it occasionally.  We didn't even have to run different plays.  We could have run our usual offense.  Just the change in tempo alone would have been a new thing for opposing defenses.  It would have, by engaging more of the brain part of football, given us slight advantage at points.

O-ree-gonz offense having a tough time against top teams?--did you see the title game?  Their loss to 'burn was not because of the hurry-up.  It was due to running 180 or so lb running backs at the goal line.  Ya need beef at the goal line at some points.  It's so blindingly evident as something we've lacked over the last 3-5 years that it requires no explanation.

The Ducks disdained a field goal at the Auburn goal line with about 4 mintues left, instead running their lightweight rb's.  Got no points.  Later they got to the goal line and their lightweight rb's again were stopped.  Until--brainpower--they didt hat pitch forward to an rb run that the Dallas Cowboys use.  That brains-over-brawn play got them the td.  But they lost because they failed to get points at the 4 minute mark because they didn't have an elephant rb to run it in.

Ya need some stampeding big running backs and ya needs to engage the brainpower.

That said, I don't think we should run the hurry-up all of the time.  Variety in our offense is variety of problems which we can blow at the oppo's defense.

If you go to the spring game, don't be near the sideline.  I think there's gonna be some bigtime talent hitting and playmaking going on.
Monroe Slavin
General User
MS
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121
person
mail
Monroe Slavin
mail
Posted: 4/13/2011 4:06 PM
I'm not stupid.

http://www.thepost.ohiou.edu/content/football-young-passers-aim-starting-role

We were stodgy and didn't take advantage of alteration of temp last year.  119 of 120 in plays run!  When you have an overwhelming advantage in talent, you can beat the other team.  But whipping the bottom 6-7 teams in the MAC proves nothing and impresses no one.

All anyone remembers is the flatness of kents and Troy.  We got beated.
Showing Messages: 1 - 23 of 23
MAC News Links
Monday, May 11, 2026



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)