menu
Logo
Ohio Football Topic
Topic: PreSnapRead.com MAC analysis
Page: 1 of 1
Cat4ever
General User
C4
Member Since: 12/29/2007
Location: Oakland, FL
Post Count: 447
person
mail
Cat4ever
mail
Posted: 7/12/2011 4:42 AM
There's a lot of interesting stuff in Paul Myerberg's rundown on the MAC, including plaudids for Coach Solich and some comments that provide insight into the logic behind the order of teams in his count-up to No. 1 (he does not believe Ohio has the best talent in the MAC, but he does believe it is good and should feast on what he believes is the easiest FBS schedule).

But enough preface. The post is here: http://www.presnapread.com/forecasting-the-mac-in-2011/#more-23518.

Enjoy (or not) and let the comments begin!
Robert Fox
General User
RF
Member Since: 11/17/2004
Location: Knoxville, TN
Post Count: 2,039
person
mail
Robert Fox
mail
Posted: 7/12/2011 8:28 AM
"...slightly above-average team."

That's an interesting take.
Cat4ever
General User
C4
Member Since: 12/29/2007
Location: Oakland, FL
Post Count: 447
person
mail
Cat4ever
mail
Posted: 7/12/2011 9:46 AM
Robert Fox wrote:expand_more
"...slightly above-average team."

That's an interesting take.


Foxie,

It is possibly a fair evaluation to depict us as "slightly above average" -- IF he's looking at OUr team in the context of the big picture of all 120 FBS teams. 

That is sure a nice upgrade from where we were regarded seven years ago! And the 'Cats are still "a project" ... a work in progress.

I know I certainly wouldn't go on record with a resounding endorsement of a team that has the kinds of questionmarks that we have -- notably at QB and RB. Rather, I'd fill the opinion with a lot of "if's."



Bobcat36
General User
Member Since: 1/5/2005
Location: Delaware, OH
Post Count: 1,167
mail
Bobcat36
mail
Posted: 7/12/2011 10:05 AM
I honestly prefer it this way...OUr program will demonstrate the fact that we are at a true cross roads this season and if we can do it without the spotlight on us until half way through the season (after we've had a chance to mature OUr QB) then so much the better...
Robert Fox
General User
RF
Member Since: 11/17/2004
Location: Knoxville, TN
Post Count: 2,039
person
mail
Robert Fox
mail
Posted: 7/12/2011 10:32 AM
Cat4ever wrote:expand_more
"...slightly above-average team."

That's an interesting take.


Foxie,

It is possibly a fair evaluation to depict us as "slightly above average" -- IF he's looking at OUr team in the context of the big picture of all 120 FBS teams. 

That is sure a nice upgrade from where we were regarded seven years ago! And the 'Cats are still "a project" ... a work in progress.

I know I certainly wouldn't go on record with a resounding endorsement of a team that has the kinds of questionmarks that we have -- notably at QB and RB. Rather, I'd fill the opinion with a lot of "if's."





I agree. I think it is a fair evaluation. My point is that it should serve to temper the 10-win predictions we are hearing. I fear our collective expectations may be a bit too high this year. If this team wins 8 or 9, is that a failure?
UpSan Bobcat
General User
Member Since: 8/30/2005
Location: Upper Sandusky, OH
Post Count: 3,817
mail
UpSan Bobcat
mail
Posted: 7/12/2011 10:45 AM
Robert Fox wrote:expand_more
"...slightly above-average team."

That's an interesting take.


Foxie,

It is possibly a fair evaluation to depict us as "slightly above average" -- IF he's looking at OUr team in the context of the big picture of all 120 FBS teams. 

That is sure a nice upgrade from where we were regarded seven years ago! And the 'Cats are still "a project" ... a work in progress.

I know I certainly wouldn't go on record with a resounding endorsement of a team that has the kinds of questionmarks that we have -- notably at QB and RB. Rather, I'd fill the opinion with a lot of "if's."





I agree. I think it is a fair evaluation. My point is that it should serve to temper the 10-win predictions we are hearing. I fear our collective expectations may be a bit too high this year. If this team wins 8 or 9, is that a failure?


I think as a whole, fans of teams generally do have higher expectations than what should realistically be expected. I think 8-9 wins is realistic. If everything falls into place and we get breaks, we could win 10-11 or even 12 games. I'm not counting on it, though. If some things really fall apart, I don't think 6-7 wins is out of the question.
L.C.
General User
LC
Member Since: 9/1/2005
Post Count: 10,584
person
mail
L.C.
mail
Posted: 7/12/2011 4:30 PM
Just remember that my prediction of an undefeated season in 2011 was made several years ago, before the server crash. Could they lose a game or three this year? Sure. Could they be undefeated? There is no doubt in my mind that it could happen. Therefore I see no conclusive reason to change my forecast at this time. I've taken a bit of heat over the years for what seemed like an outlandish prediction a few years ago, so if it happens, this way I can claim credit as the first person to predict it.

Would I consider an 8-10 win season a disappointment? No, you take your wins as you find them, and the ball doesn't always bounce the right way. So long as the kids play as hard as they can for 60 minutes a game, they'll have my support, regardless of the final result. Go Bobcats.
Last Edited: 7/12/2011 4:30:45 PM by L.C.
OhioCatFan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 15,714
mail
OhioCatFan
mail
Posted: 7/12/2011 4:58 PM
L.C., you old piker, what's this 12-0 stuff?  I won't be satisfied with anything less than 14-0! 
Athens
General User
A
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Alexandria, VA
Post Count: 5,454
person
mail
Athens
mail
Posted: 7/12/2011 5:04 PM
Bobcat36 wrote:expand_more
I honestly prefer it this way...OUr program will demonstrate the fact that we are at a true cross roads this season and if we can do it without the spotlight on us until half way through the season (after we've had a chance to mature OUr QB) then so much the better...


The program is in an envious position to be in. Solich has made some questionable calls on and off the field but over the long haul is turning out to be a great move. At seven seasons he is the dean of MAC coaches. He owns a record of 5-1 against Miami and 3-1 against Temple the next two best teams in the division. The biggest issue that has kept Ohio from a bowl win or a MAC Championship was not having the talent at a few positions. QB and RB continue to be question marks but he has loaded this program upfront and at receiver. I'm pretty convinced Frank is going to be coaching in Athens through 2015 after that Burrow will take over to continue the tradition.
Pataskala
General User
P
Member Since: 7/8/2010
Location: At least six feet away from anybody else
Post Count: 9,465
person
mail
Pataskala
mail
Posted: 7/12/2011 8:33 PM
There's no question that Solich was a "find", if not a steal.  To have somebody of his caliber coaching in the MAC, and especially at OU, is awesome.  I think the assessment in the article is about right.  There are too many questions at key functions going into the season (i.e., QB, the running game and the entire D line) to rate the team better than "slightly above average."  I think it'll all come together by October, tho, when the seemingly softest part of the schedule hits.  I was a bit surprised they picked us first; I'm hoping the MAC media isn't so generous 'cause they always get it wrong.
Paul Graham
General User
Member Since: 1/18/2005
Location: The Plains, OH
Post Count: 1,424
mail
Paul Graham
mail
Posted: 7/12/2011 10:28 PM
Pataskala wrote:expand_more
There's no question that Solich was a "find", if not a steal.  To have somebody of his caliber coaching in the MAC, and especially at OU, is awesome.


Yep! I totally agree. I wonder...if we can put together a couple of great seasons, perhaps Frank will become the face of the MAC and Ohio will become THE place to play in the conference. Then we would really be in position to clean up (on the field and recruiting-wise) for a few years until he retires. It's time this conference had a successful coach that is happy to be here.

Lets just hope that other MAC schools don't figure this out and start hiring older, experienced coaches who have had their fill of BCS football.
oubobcatjohn
General User
O
Member Since: 1/1/2005
Post Count: 838
person
mail
oubobcatjohn
mail
Posted: 7/13/2011 12:06 AM
8 wins or more is always a success at Ohio.  Very few Ohio have done that.  I'll also take 6-2 or better in the MAC every year.  I think we are over do for a 10 win season. Solich has had this team for several years and Ohio is probably the most stable program in the MAC in terms of the coaching staff turnover.  Everyone else has a new coach. WMU is probably the only team that could claim more tenure at the top than Ohio. Everybody in the division has gone thru major changes to their coaching staff except Ohio the last 3 years.  Ohio players don't have to learn a new system.  They have seen it for several years. That saves time in practice and Ohio can move on to more advanced stuff.    
Showing Messages: 1 - 12 of 12



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)