Why does the author think the U. of Houston is irrelevant to the national conversation? They're in the top 20 and have the number one pass offense in the country. Also, he said the Bengals stink, but they're solid.
Oh, right, it's Bleacher Report.
The Bengals still stink as a fan draw. They haven't had a sell-out all year and last week's game was their best attendance yet, 52,000, about 80% of capacity.
I've never really understood the point of the "worst" lists. One web columnist has a weekly "bottom 10" list that is usually well (?) represented by the MAC. Why humiliate teams or schools by pointing out their obvious shortcomings?