menu
Logo
Ohio Football Topic
Topic: Uni's and injuries
Page: 1 of 1
PA Bobcat Fan
General User
PBF
Member Since: 9/20/2005
Post Count: 78
person
mail
PA Bobcat Fan
mail
Posted: 11/9/2011 12:54 PM
Looking at that pic in another thread (1973 Ohio vs. Penn State) I couldn't help but notice the oversized shoulder, hip, and thigh pads. Comparing the uniforms from then to the "slimmed down" versions used today, does anyone think there's any correlation with the many shoulder or other injuries that players sustain nowadays?

When you look at today's uniforms, it looks like there's very little protection at all. I know that new technology makes things thinner and stronger, but less area protected has to be a negative.

Are players sacrificing vanity to look better over protection?
mf279801
General User
M279801
Member Since: 8/6/2010
Location: Newark, DE
Post Count: 2,486
person
mail
mf279801
mail
Posted: 11/9/2011 1:01 PM
Are the shoulder and thigh pads any smaller today, or are players that much bigger? (I'm being serious with that question, my parents didn't even know each other when the picture in question was posted.)
Bobcat Grad 86
General User
BG86
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 1,397
person
mail
Bobcat Grad 86
mail
Posted: 11/9/2011 1:22 PM
Shoulder pads for most positions are smaller and based more on the positon.  Back in the 70's, there were probably three or four basic styles and now there are many more based on position.  While the current shoulder pads are smaller on top of the shoulder, I think that most cover a larger area around the chest and upper torso.

Thigh and knee pads were much larger back then, but I doubt the smaller knee pad or even no knee pads for many receivers make much difference as most knee injuries are based on the foot being planted and the knee bent.

Most of the hip pad today I believe are set in the girdle.  Back in Junior High and High School we had hip pads on a separate belt and most of the players put that over the jersey so they stuck up and were visabile.  Since most NFL players did not wear hip pads, I wore them under my jersey so you could not see them and so I would like an NFL player.  I played somewhere between average and below average, but at least in my mind I thought I looked good, kind of like looking good for golf.

I think many of the injuries today are based on much larger players and getting away from old school techniques such at tackling with your shouder and trying to lift the players feet off the ground during the tackle.  It seems that the advancement of helmets and equipment has taken fear away and maybe leads to more injuries.
Bobcatbob
General User
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Coolville, OH
Post Count: 1,351
mail
Bobcatbob
mail
Posted: 11/9/2011 1:23 PM
Pads today are both smaller AND stronger.  That PSU - OU picture may (or may not) show a friend of mine from that team (can't remember his number) who was forced out of the program due to recurring shoulder injuries/surgeries.  Bulkier looking pads certainly didn't help him.
L.C.
General User
LC
Member Since: 9/1/2005
Post Count: 10,584
person
mail
L.C.
mail
Posted: 11/9/2011 2:21 PM
I think that the main problem is that weight training and diet can make players bigger, faster, and stronger. That means more energy to be absorbed in every collision. Pads may be stronger, and safer, and even fields, and all that helps. But, guess what - some things never change. Tendons, ligaments, cartilege, etc are unchanged. Bones do get stronger a little, but not enough to compensate for the increases in muscles, etc. Add it together, and you are going to get more injuries.
Showing Messages: 1 - 5 of 5



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)