Coaches think Clemson has more resources than us so do we need to limit Clemson's resources? Does a coach draw the line for NIL spending at about where he can currently spend and not think that he should be limited for the sake of the 1000 college football programs in the USA that can spend less than him all while he draws a salary or millions of dollars a year and, obviously, there should be no cap on that? Glaring Hypocrisy.

It appears that the NCAA and the member institutions don’t want to compensate “student athletes”. They’ve played this game since the 1950s.