Unfortunately, just the record at northwestern is not an indication of how good a coach is compared to other coaches in the country. I’m guessing other academically tough schools like Stanford and ND have done a lot better than NW. how’s he done lately? Is that something to be proud of?
With that bunch of losing records, maybe they should have dropped football like the University of Chicago did years ago.
Northwestern faces multiple issues in trying to be competitive in football. One is academics. Another is the fact that they have a much, much smaller enrollment than most of the Big Ten. Another is that they have no "natural" recruiting area; even though they are in the Chicago area, they are unknown and irrelevant in Chicago, and statewide they have to compete with Illinois. On top of that, they used to have very poor facilities, though that may no longer be true.
As for his record the last two years, yes, it has not been good. Still, years like that are not uncommon at Northwestern, so he has a wider margin for error than a coach would have at most schools today. If he has a couple more 1-10 seasons, he will no doubt be fired for performance reasons, as tolerance does have limits, even at Northwestern.
As for whether they should give up football entirely, perhaps they should. Yet, it is true that almost all of the really, really bad records came in the period from 1973 to 1991:
John Pont 1973-1977 12-43 182 .218
Rick Venturi 1978-1980 1-31-1 .045
Dennis Green 1981-1985 10-45 .182
Francis Peay 1986-1991 13-51-2 .212
That was a dark era for Northwestern. It was very comparable to the Bryant-Lichtenberg period for Ohio, but it lasted nearly twice as long. Should Ohio have given up football after that period?
I don't see any reason for firing Fitzgerald, at this point, for performance. On the other hand, I am very surprised he wasn't summarily dismissed for cause.
Last Edited: 7/9/2023 1:27:01 PM by L.C.