There's an article by Dan Wolken of USA Today about NIL's.
The NCAA is taking the position that NCAA Rules govern.
A Memo sent out Tuesday says in part "If a State Law permits certain
institutional action and NCAA legislation prohibits the same action,
institutions must follow NCAA legislation."
It will be interesting to see how this plays out.
I thought, "Well, duh", when I heard this. Almost everything that the NCAA prohibits, historically or presently, isn't against the law. The guys suspended in the NFL for gambling today didn't break the law. My company prohibits me from doing all sorts of things that wouldn't be against state law. I mean it can be against the law to prohibit things that the law guarantees that you always have a right to but that isn't what we are talking about. I don't see how the state law allows it can even be brought up. That argument should be immediately dismisses by anyone with a brain. It seems to me that the schools are saying we want an edge so we want to cheat so we are going to obviously cheat where everyone knows we are cheating and see if the punishment for cheating from a weakened NCAA can even outweigh the benefits from openly cheating.
If states are hell bent on helping their own programs they might pass laws that prohibit the NCAA from denying schools their right but if that happens they need to be kicked out of the NCAA regardless of if that hurts the school or the rest of the NCAA because they cannot exist within it. I mean you cant let there be an environment where a state says their players have a right to be as physical as they want while playing the game and this would be akin to that. If you are Legislating fake rights to gain an advantage you need to be blackballed.