Problem is, if they get rid of bowls, we'd still see 6-6 teams playing each other. What we wouldn't see is a couple of MAC teams at 10-2 or 9-3 playing in bowls. They'd be home for the holidays. They just need to go back to teams needing a winning record to be in a bowl. 14 teams with a 6-6 record. That's ridiculous, that's 7 full games' worth.
Not if they also do away with most of the automatic bids for the bigger conferences AND require that teams with winning records get picked before 6-6 teams. It's ok for a conference champion to get an automatic bid to one of the BSC bowls, but 6-6 teams shouldn't get priority over teams that have real success during the season. Bowls should not be a reward for mediocrity.
Also, let's do away with multiple bowls in the same city. Nawlins gets two bowls every year (three with the BCS championship game this year), so do Dallas, San Diego, Orlando, Tampa-St Pete, and the Phoenix area. Usually, one of the bowls in these cities isn't very well attended unless they have a local team playing. I know most bowls help local charities (like the 84,000 potatoes that went to Boise food banks), but it seems that some are just there to exist.