menu
Logo
Bobcat Attack Menu
Logo
Ohio Football Topic
Topic: LOVE theory and rationale...
Page: 2 of 2
Athens
General User
A
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Alexandria, VA
Post Count: 5,454
person
mail
Athens
mail
Posted: 7/29/2010 9:35 PM
settings_applications edit_note
OhioCatFan wrote:expand_more
. . .  Some of the BCS names mentioned on here like Syracuse and Northwestern are not going to travel to Peden Stadium. . .


Hmm . . . yeah right! Northwestern signed a 1-1 with us in recent memory, which WE abrogated.  Syracuse has signed a 1-1 with Oxford Tech and, I believe Toledo.  Where do you come up with this stuff?  Usually I like what you have to say, Wes, but I think in this thread you are stretching things to make a point.   Having a 1-1 with the Orange is not mutually exclusive with having a 1-1 with Navy.  I'd be in favor of both, and as I stated previously I would probably go to both the home and the away Navy game.  


I was talking traveling meaning bringing a large contingent of fans. I can see 4-5k Navy and/or Marshall fans traveling to Peden and adding above average interest for Bobcat fans. Ideal non-con schedule for Ohio would be a rotation of #1 OSU, PSU, VT, TN, #2 Navy, #3 Marshall, #4 CAA/MEAC/Southern FCS team. This way we'd have either Marshall or Navy in the house for a nice traveling crowd early to set the tone for the remainder of the football season. That is not too far from what we play now, subbing out North Texas and New Mexico St for Navy.
OhioCatFan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 15,709
mail
OhioCatFan
mail
Posted: 7/29/2010 10:19 PM
settings_applications edit_note
OK, Wes, that makes sense.  I probably read your post too fast, and forgot what you had said earlier in the thread.  My bad.  I think 1-1 with the likes of Indiana and WVU (that'll be a hard sell in Morgantown) would be ideal in terms of bringing in the crowds.  Pitt would also be great and doable -- but not while Pederson is still the AD.  Louisville is also a possibility for bringing lots of visiting fans to Peden.  Lots of doable stuff here.  I, for one, will be almost as disappointed as BL if we have a banner season this fall and some changes aren't made to the schedule for upcoming years.  Hey, maybe since Oxford Tech sucks so much, we could take their place in the annual home and home series with Zinnzinati.  
Athens
General User
A
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Alexandria, VA
Post Count: 5,454
person
mail
Athens
mail
Posted: 7/29/2010 10:39 PM
settings_applications edit_note
OhioCatFan wrote:expand_more
OK, Wes, that makes sense.  I probably read your post too fast, and forgot what you had said earlier in the thread.  My bad.  I think 1-1 with the likes of Indiana and WVU (that'll be a hard sell in Morgantown) would be ideal in terms of bringing in the crowds.  Pitt would also be great and doable -- but not while Pederson is still the AD.  Louisville is also a possibility for bringing lots of visiting fans to Peden.  Lots of doable stuff here.  I, for one, will be almost as disappointed as BL if we have a banner season this fall and some changes aren't made to the schedule for upcoming years.  Hey, maybe since Oxford Tech sucks so much, we could take their place in the annual home and home series with Zinnzinati.  


I don't perceive Indiana is much of an upgrade over North Texas or WVU over Marshall. Forget the Midwest schools, go 2 for 1 and bring in Oklahoma, Florida, Oregon, Clemson, Virginia Tech. 1 Large player in the stadium every year. Tell Ohio State they owe us one game in Peden for every game we've played at the Horeshoe.
ts1227
General User
T1227
Member Since: 2/28/2006
Location: Tallmadge, OH
Post Count: 880
person
mail
ts1227
mail
Posted: 7/29/2010 11:21 PM
settings_applications edit_note
colobobcat66 wrote:expand_more
A question-Has Miami getting beat to death with their recent tough schedules helped their fan base or support?  (Clue-check out their attendence)
Getting the crap beat out of you might be semi-interesting to some, but I'd rather build a program differently. 


To be fair with this point, Miami also loses to most every team in the MAC anymore as well.  It's not like they were just getting smoked by the big dogs. 
Last Edited: 7/29/2010 11:22:58 PM by ts1227
GoCats105
General User
GC105
Member Since: 1/31/2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Post Count: 7,825
person
mail
GoCats105
mail
Posted: 7/30/2010 12:52 AM
settings_applications edit_note
Wes wrote:expand_more
OK, Wes, that makes sense.  I probably read your post too fast, and forgot what you had said earlier in the thread.  My bad.  I think 1-1 with the likes of Indiana and WVU (that'll be a hard sell in Morgantown) would be ideal in terms of bringing in the crowds.  Pitt would also be great and doable -- but not while Pederson is still the AD.  Louisville is also a possibility for bringing lots of visiting fans to Peden.  Lots of doable stuff here.  I, for one, will be almost as disappointed as BL if we have a banner season this fall and some changes aren't made to the schedule for upcoming years.  Hey, maybe since Oxford Tech sucks so much, we could take their place in the annual home and home series with Zinnzinati.  


I don't perceive Indiana is much of an upgrade over North Texas or WVU over Marshall. Forget the Midwest schools, go 2 for 1 and bring in Oklahoma, Florida, Oregon, Clemson, Virginia Tech. 1 Large player in the stadium every year. Tell Ohio State they owe us one game in Peden for every game we've played at the Horeshoe.


Yeah good luck with that. Cincinnati is finishing their 2 for 1 with Oklahoma, and their in a BCS conference. I dont know how they even swung that to tell you the truth.
bobcat28
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 817
mail
bobcat28
mail
Posted: 7/30/2010 9:10 AM
settings_applications edit_note
Wes wrote:expand_more
OK, Wes, that makes sense.  I probably read your post too fast, and forgot what you had said earlier in the thread.  My bad.  I think 1-1 with the likes of Indiana and WVU (that'll be a hard sell in Morgantown) would be ideal in terms of bringing in the crowds.  Pitt would also be great and doable -- but not while Pederson is still the AD.  Louisville is also a possibility for bringing lots of visiting fans to Peden.  Lots of doable stuff here.  I, for one, will be almost as disappointed as BL if we have a banner season this fall and some changes aren't made to the schedule for upcoming years.  Hey, maybe since Oxford Tech sucks so much, we could take their place in the annual home and home series with Zinnzinati.  


I don't perceive Indiana is much of an upgrade over North Texas or WVU over Marshall. Forget the Midwest schools, go 2 for 1 and bring in Oklahoma, Florida, Oregon, Clemson, Virginia Tech. 1 Large player in the stadium every year. Tell Ohio State they owe us one game in Peden for every game we've played at the Horeshoe.


2 for 1 meaning we get 2 home games in peden and go on the road once right?
Cat4ever
General User
C4
Member Since: 12/29/2007
Location: Oakland, FL
Post Count: 447
person
mail
Cat4ever
mail
Posted: 7/30/2010 9:12 AM
settings_applications edit_note
Flomo-genized wrote:expand_more
...Winning your conference is only a significant accomplishment when you play in what is viewed to be a competitive league, and unfortunately the MAC is a second-rate conference.  Therefore, if you really want to grab the attention of current students (and alumni for that matter), you need to play - and defeat -  quality OOC competition.  And to really reach the current student body in significant numbers, some of those games need to be at home...


Flomo, most of your points were wonderful and spectacularly presented. But I need to step into this point and ask a question: Would you have made this statement after the 2003 MAC season?

There is no doubt that MAC teams have not generally represented themselves as powers when they play outside the conference the last several years.  But the question becomes, is that merely the natural order of things?

If anyone concludes that to be the case, then it's silly to be having this discussion: You'd have to schedule and beat three Top 15 teams OOC to stand a chance of being regarded as anything but a joke yourself!

I'm not close enough to any of the MAC schools to have a clue about the level of administrative support for athletics. What I will say is this: If there is support, and if that support leads to landing the right people in athletic leadership roles, then teams become successful.  Will the MAC ever be "BCS caliber"?  It's stupid to utter the word "never," so I'll answer with "probably not."  But that does not preclude either individual schools or the conference as a whole from being "BCS-competitive."  2003 is a case study.

And with the 85-scholarship limit, there is lots of opportunity for success in surprising places.

I'll close this with a question: Right now, would you rather be cheering for OUr team or Indiana, Washington State, Syracuse or Vanderbilt?
Flomo-genized
General User
F
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 574
person
mail
Flomo-genized
mail
Posted: 7/30/2010 9:49 AM
settings_applications edit_note

If we had been able to maintain or surpass the success of 2003 in subsequent seasons then I agree this would be a different discussion.  If the MAC were positioned like the MWC is currently, with the conference champion regularly qualifying for a BCS bowl game, then I believe students and alumni would be more supportive of the program.  Unfortunately, though, the MAC failed to build upon its success in 2003.  In fact, we took multiple steps backward.  Therefore, when one looks back over the last 30-40 years of MAC football, 2003 is pretty clearly an anomoly. 

I don't think that you have to beat 3-4 BCS teams every year to make a splash.  I think that if we were regularly winning conference titles, and beating 1-2 BCS level teams per season, then our success would seem more legitimate to the average fan that grew up watching only BCS level football.  In contrast, if we win the MAC anytime over the next few seasons, but lose to the one legitimate BCS team we face, many fans will simply view us as a pretty good team at the little league level.  I do not believe that will create the type of lasting, donating fan support we need.

Put differently, there is a reason that the Pitt game is still talked about so much today; it was the type of game that ignites a fan base.  Yes it was an unusual combination of factors that won't be duplicated regularly.  But even a game 80% as memorable as the Pitt game would do light years more to engender lasting fan excitement and support than will the games again North Texas, Louisiana-Lafayette, and Eastern Illinois.  And building a supportive, donating fan base should be the #1 priority for us right now, given the budget woes.

Cat4ever
General User
C4
Member Since: 12/29/2007
Location: Oakland, FL
Post Count: 447
person
mail
Cat4ever
mail
Posted: 7/30/2010 11:03 AM
settings_applications edit_note
Good thoughts, Flomo.  But I'd still rather be rooting for OUr team right not than Indiana, Washington State, Syracuse or Vanderbilt!
Robert Fox
General User
RF
Member Since: 11/17/2004
Location: Knoxville, TN
Post Count: 2,039
person
mail
Robert Fox
mail
Posted: 7/30/2010 12:12 PM
settings_applications edit_note
I don't get why some in our fanbase are willing to deem some teams with labels like "sucks," "crappy," or "a joke." It seems to me, unless your a consistently top 25 team, you're a "crappy" team yourself. Case in point is the forever ridiculed N Texas team that we BARELY beat.

Maybe the talent difference between the N Texas' of the world and the lower level BCS teams is not all that different. Do we risk less in losing to Indiana than to Lou Laf?
Flomo-genized
General User
F
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 574
person
mail
Flomo-genized
mail
Posted: 7/30/2010 12:22 PM
settings_applications edit_note
It's simply an issue of perception among the masses.  Rightly or wrongly, wins against North Texas and Eastern Illinois simply do not excite the causal fan.  Those type of wins do not convey a sense that we are building a big-time program, one that might be worth following over (or in addition to) the Suckeyes. 
Cat4ever
General User
C4
Member Since: 12/29/2007
Location: Oakland, FL
Post Count: 447
person
mail
Cat4ever
mail
Posted: 7/30/2010 12:30 PM
settings_applications edit_note
Robert Fox wrote:expand_more
I don't get why some in our fanbase are willing to deem some teams with labels like "sucks," "crappy," or "a joke." It seems to me, unless your a consistently top 25 team, you're a "crappy" team yourself. Case in point is the forever ridiculed N Texas team that we BARELY beat.

Maybe the talent difference between the N Texas' of the world and the lower level BCS teams is not all that different. Do we risk less in losing to Indiana than to Lou Laf?


Robert, you are correct in your thinking about the razor-thin margins separating most (and I would dare say, "the majority") of D-1 teams.  When I mention Indiana (or Washington State, Vanderbilt or Syracuse) my point is that within the context of their schedules (each a BCS conference) they currently are not very likely to give their fans much to cheer about.  I honestly don't have a clue how well OUr team would do were we challenged by any of those schedules.  But I do know this: I'd rather be rooting for Green & White right now than any of those aforementioned teams.

Personally, I don't think any team on our schedule is "a joke."  After decades removed from an active interest in Ohio football, I couldn't resist becoming interested when Frank Solich became coach.  And I attended a game for only the second time since the 1960s when we played Southern Mississippi in the GMAC Bowl. Subsequently, I've been in the stands when the 'Cats played Wyoming, VMI, Connecticut and Northwestern. Contrary to the perspective of some others on this board, my favorite game was against VMI.  The others were losses.  None was lopsided. We weren't humiliated.  But the fact is, we lost.  That, Robert, is what "sucks"!
Robert Fox
General User
RF
Member Since: 11/17/2004
Location: Knoxville, TN
Post Count: 2,039
person
mail
Robert Fox
mail
Posted: 7/30/2010 12:31 PM
settings_applications edit_note
Exactly. And it's that perception that BL is using to prop up his point. But in making his point, he also resorts to labeling teams "crappy," implying that OU is a clearly better team.

In my opinion, BL's better tactic is illustrated by my question above: What is more damaging to OU's football reputation:
1. A loss to Indiana
2. A loss to Lou Laf
OrlandoCat
General User
OC
Member Since: 3/15/2005
Post Count: 355
person
mail
OrlandoCat
mail
Posted: 7/31/2010 4:09 AM
settings_applications edit_note
UpSan Bobcat wrote:expand_more
I realize we're looking for even bigger programs than Pitt (when they were down) and UConn, but I'm not sure Peden would sell out for a team like Miami (FL) unless tickets were reduced. And I certainly don't think we'd gain more than a handful of extra season ticket holders by having a team like that on the schedule.

The problem is most people really don't care who Ohio plays. I'd love to see a team like Miami come to Peden. I'd probably go out of my way to go to that game. I just don't think that many other people would.


You do realize that when Pitt came in they were ranked the week prior (before losing to ND) and it set the single game attendance record a Peden right?

Never mind the fact that Miami was ranked as high as 9th last year before ending at 19th.  Yea, who'd want to see that crap shoot in Peden.

Put it on a Friay night again I'll bet you anything we have a new attendance record again.

Simple formula:

Name Team + ESPN Coverage = Sell Out

You are right though, nobody really cares about Uconn.
Oldcat
General User
Member Since: 7/18/2010
Post Count: 192
mail
Oldcat
mail
Posted: 7/31/2010 2:05 PM
settings_applications edit_note

A lot of good points have been made but the reasons we struggle to obtain marquee opponents as well as players boils down to three things...location, location, and location. SE Ohio remains one of the best kept secrets ever but OU is miles away from any major metropolitan area that would provide a larger fan base for season ticket sales, expanded press coverage, and of course, the transportation (airport) issue. Nothing new there as it has been reported here time and time again over the years. I don't consider myself a long suffering fan (forty plus years routing for the Bobcats) settling for mediocrity. I'm just a happy fan enjoying the recent successes.   

Turney13
General User
T13
Member Since: 7/28/2010
Post Count: 364
person
mail
Turney13
mail
Posted: 4/20/2012 8:11 PM
settings_applications edit_note
funny
L.C.
General User
LC
Member Since: 9/1/2005
Post Count: 10,584
person
mail
L.C.
mail
Posted: 4/20/2012 8:43 PM
settings_applications edit_note
With the passage of time, some of the posts have indeed proven to be incorrect. It seems that the AD's plan is working, and Ohio continues building an ever-more-solid program. Hopefully by the time of the Kansas and Cincy games they will sell those games out before the season ever starts, and there will never be an issue of giving tickets away at deep discounts to fill Peden, which they did against U. Conn.

I would add one additional thing that has been discussed since this thread. As I recall someone said that a study had shown that each home game produced a net impact of something like $3-500,000 or something to the Athens economy. Therefore in answer to the questions of "who wouldn't want to do away with the 6th home game", I would think the answer would be "people from Athens".
MonroeClassmate
General User
MC
Member Since: 8/31/2010
Post Count: 2,325
person
mail
MonroeClassmate
mail
Posted: 4/21/2012 2:36 PM
settings_applications edit_note
Why is this a thread?  Wasn't Kansas and Cincinnati announced before this was written?  
Ryan Carey
Site Programmer
Member Since: 11/11/2004
Post Count: 993
mail
Ryan Carey
mail
Posted: 4/21/2012 6:27 PM
settings_applications edit_note
2010 happened before this week.
JSF
General User
Member Since: 1/29/2005
Location: Houston, TX
Post Count: 6,580
mail
JSF
mail
Posted: 4/23/2012 12:14 AM
settings_applications edit_note
Ryan Carey wrote:expand_more
2010 happened before this week.





Showing Messages: 26 - 45 of 45
reply
vertical_align_top
vertical_align_center
vertical_align_bottom
add_comment
chevron_backward
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)