menu
Logo
Ohio Football Topic
Topic: Will the MAC expand too?
Page: 1 of 1
BobcatCrew
General User
BC
Member Since: 5/2/2012
Post Count: 109
person
mail
BobcatCrew
mail
Posted: 5/1/2012 9:15 PM
With this weeks C-USA, SunBelt, and MWC expansions, along with the previous Big East, B1G, SEC, ACC and PAC12 expansions and the collapse of the WAC... would the MAC continue the trend?

There have been some threads on the ESPN and CBSsports sites where users have strongly suggested Army should join the MAC?  With smaller suggestions of Marshall rejoining and leaving the C-USA mess, WKU, Southern Illinois, Northern Iowa, and for Grand Valley State to finally stop dominating DII and joining DI... others?  Even talk of kicking Eastern Michigan out because well... you know

Thoughts?
Last Edited: 5/1/2012 11:22:52 PM by BobcatCrew
colobobcat66
General User
C66
Member Since: 9/1/2006
Location: Watching the bobcats run outside my window., CO
Post Count: 4,744
person
mail
colobobcat66
mail
Posted: 5/2/2012 10:55 AM
I don't know about that but I do know that C-USA has taken a huge step back in football. Any notion that it is better than than the MAC can be put to rest.
C Money
General User
Member Since: 8/28/2010
Post Count: 3,420
mail
C Money
mail
Posted: 5/2/2012 11:03 AM
I continue to think that adding schools like James Madison and Delaware is a good idea, but I think it is more important to shed the teams that are keeping us down. Not to cross-pollute threads, but when you have Kent, EMU, etc., continually failing to meet the minimum attendance requirements but for some shady accounting magic, there is a problem in continuing your relationship with those programs.

I do find the CUSA move funny, though. As much as that conference likes to look down on the lowly MAC, the new CUSA, across the board, is not materially better than the MAC on or off the field. Neither conference is going to get a seat in this "playoff" until and unless it expands to 16 to make conference champs automatic qualifiers. And the Grand Alliance is dead, so there goes their vision of a nationwide cable network. They are a regional conference, like us, which will always be less prominent than the SEC/ACC/Big 12 in their respective markets. We only have to compete with the B1G for attention.
Last Edited: 5/2/2012 11:03:40 AM by C Money
Jeff McKinney
Moderator
JM
Member Since: 11/12/2004
Post Count: 6,163
person
mail
Jeff McKinney
mail
Posted: 5/2/2012 11:46 AM
There was some talk that Marshall was going to push for some current MAC teams, including Ohio, to be included in this new CUSA.  However, as you can see, nothing came of these rumors.  Perhaps Marshall pushed for it but was turned down. 

I think this whole situation underlines again how the MAC is viewed nationally as the dregs of BCS football.  None...NONE of our schools are attractive to CUSA or Sun Belt, which are desperate to add good teams.  I don't even think the Sun Belt is interested in us. 

The MAC is completely an afterthought in national athletics discussion.  We may be better than the Sun Belt most years in the football Sagarins, but in the conference hierarchy, it looks like the MAC is considered a "nothing" league. 
Pataskala
General User
P
Member Since: 7/8/2010
Location: At least six feet away from anybody else
Post Count: 9,465
person
mail
Pataskala
mail
Posted: 5/2/2012 12:50 PM
Jeff McKinney wrote:expand_more
There was some talk that Marshall was going to push for some current MAC teams, including Ohio, to be included in this new CUSA.  However, as you can see, nothing came of these rumors.  Perhaps Marshall pushed for it but was turned down. 

I think this whole situation underlines again how the MAC is viewed nationally as the dregs of BCS football.  None...NONE of our schools are attractive to CUSA or Sun Belt, which are desperate to add good teams.  I don't even think the Sun Belt is interested in us. 

The MAC is completely an afterthought in national athletics discussion.  We may be better than the Sun Belt most years in the football Sagarins, but in the conference hierarchy, it looks like the MAC is considered a "nothing" league. 


Given that CUSA is primarily a Deep South conference, I doubt that Marshall has much clout.  And Sun Belt is also looking for teams in their geographic footprint, which rules out the MAC.

I wouldn't say no MAC schools are attractive to other conferences.  The ones in or near larger cities would be: Toledo, NIU, Buffalo (though they would really need to upgrade facilities) and maybe BSU.  If they can get TV coverage into the larger markets (a la NIU's contract with Comcast in Chicago), other conferences might bite. 

I've often thought Army would be a good fit for the MAC.  But I'm not sure they can get past the fact that their days as a football powerhouse are long over.  Plus, they were really soured by their experience with CUSA.  That was never a good situation due to geographics.
ou79
General User
O79
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 671
person
mail
ou79
mail
Posted: 5/2/2012 1:01 PM
One other option discussed numerous times on here is to form an entirely new conference taking some of the better MAC schools along with some of the better CUSA schools and maybe a couple others.  Probably will never happen.
james hall united
General User
JHU
Member Since: 4/9/2012
Location: c-bus, OH
Post Count: 40
person
mail
james hall united
mail
Posted: 5/2/2012 2:27 PM
OUr only hope of conference prominence is if the new playoff/BCS retains some form of the big east, and we could join that as a football school. Unlikely we'd get the invite, but winning cures all things. And ESPN has an interest in the big east because they could provide TV coverage. Short of that we just dont have the money in the MAC to compete on a national scale. Especially when you think about the big ten network paying out $15 million annually to its members. CUSA or sunbelt would a lateral move at best. It would be best to stand pat and see how things end up with the new ESPN/playoff/BCS deal. We have a generation or so still at the kids table.
OUcats82
General User
Member Since: 1/9/2005
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Post Count: 1,912
mail
OUcats82
mail
Posted: 5/3/2012 2:58 PM
http://espn.go.com/dallas/ncf/story/_/id/7886262/north-te...

Looks like C-USA is hopping on the realignment carousel, taking two from the Sun Belt and one from the WAC.  Makes sense for LaTech. 

Through all of this the MAC has only lost Temple, an affiliate member.  I wonder if anyone else is in discussions behind closed doors?
Casper71
General User
C71
Member Since: 12/1/2006
Post Count: 3,237
person
mail
Casper71
mail
Posted: 5/3/2012 4:04 PM
Looks to me like CUSA has taken a page from the "MAC-model":   Lose from the Top and Add to the Bottom!  When you look at who they lost and who they gain this saying comes to mind: "you gotta be kidding me"!  A whole bunch of soon to be (UTSA, Charlotte) and wanna be (UNT, FIU, LaTech) football schools.  If I was Marshall or ECU, I would get out quick.  I cannot believe the MAC does not approach those two schools NOW!
NIU007b
General User
NIU007
Member Since: 11/26/2011
Post Count: 69
person
mail
NIU007b
mail
Posted: 5/3/2012 9:52 PM
Casper71 wrote:expand_more
Looks to me like CUSA has taken a page from the "MAC-model":   Lose from the Top and Add to the Bottom!  When you look at who they lost and who they gain this saying comes to mind: "you gotta be kidding me"!  A whole bunch of soon to be (UTSA, Charlotte) and wanna be (UNT, FIU, LaTech) football schools.  If I was Marshall or ECU, I would get out quick.  I cannot believe the MAC does not approach those two schools NOW!


The most surprising thing to me is that on the CUSA board they seem to be very happy with the additions. Maybe ECU and Marshall get some schools closer to them, but it's a significant hit to their so-called superiority particularly in football.
BobcatCrew
General User
BC
Member Since: 5/2/2012
Post Count: 109
person
mail
BobcatCrew
mail
Posted: 5/5/2012 5:18 PM
Thanks for the responses.... newby, first post!

Also saw Army's 2011 schedule included Northern Illinois, Ball State, Miami, and Temple.... with NIU, BSU, EMU, Kent, and Temple for this years 2012 schedule.

Are they testing out the MAC, pretty much their home conference last and this year?!  MAC East - Ohio, Miami, UMass, Buffalo, Army, Kent, and Akron.... geographically fits...  East coast and Great Lakes flare.  With the possibility of Marshall, ODU, ECU?
Last Edited: 5/5/2012 8:03:31 PM by BobcatCrew
Athens
General User
A
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Alexandria, VA
Post Count: 5,454
person
mail
Athens
mail
Posted: 5/6/2012 12:38 PM
Army has a partial scheduling agreement with the MAC for 4 games a year.
Jim G
General User
JG
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 82
person
mail
Jim G
mail
Posted: 5/7/2012 6:42 PM
Big East Commissioner Resigns

http://espn.go.com/college-sports/story/_/id/7899745/big-east-commish-john-marinatto-quits-amid-shifting-landscape
the best part

"We're excited about where we are right now," Williams said. "We feel the conference is stronger than it's ever been. We have some great new teams we are bringing in, there's a huge opportunity for us to build, so we're looking for someone who can facilitate that and make that happen."

HAHA
The Big East is dead

OhioCatFan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 15,709
mail
OhioCatFan
mail
Posted: 5/7/2012 8:19 PM
We wish Mr. Marinatto all the best in his future endeavors. 
Last Edited: 5/7/2012 8:20:56 PM by OhioCatFan
Pataskala
General User
P
Member Since: 7/8/2010
Location: At least six feet away from anybody else
Post Count: 9,465
person
mail
Pataskala
mail
Posted: 5/8/2012 8:42 PM
Sounds like he was set up for failure:

http://www.cbssports.com/columns/story/18985030
catfan28
General User
C28
Member Since: 6/11/2011
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 1,503
person
mail
catfan28
mail
Posted: 5/12/2012 1:17 PM
What a bunch of BS in that quote. Do you really think he'd be leaving if things were going well?
Showing Messages: 1 - 16 of 16



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)