menu
Logo
Ohio Football Topic
Topic: The Real Turning Point
Page: 1 of 1
First Street Forever
General User
Member Since: 12/19/2010
Location: Chicago, IL
Post Count: 247
mail
First Street Forever
mail
Posted: 9/1/2012 3:38 PM
My friend Jay noticed this: After ESPN showed the JoePa cutout in Franco Harris' skybox, Ohio scored 17 unanswered points. 




Kovy
General User
Member Since: 9/29/2011
Location: Tucson, AZ
Post Count: 51
mail
Kovy
mail
Posted: 9/1/2012 3:46 PM
I would have said the tipped pass for the touchdown, but I think you might be right.
OUcats82
General User
Member Since: 1/9/2005
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Post Count: 1,912
mail
OUcats82
mail
Posted: 9/1/2012 3:50 PM
OUr wide receivers played much better in the second half too. Really stepped up/grew up!
L.C.
General User
LC
Member Since: 9/1/2005
Post Count: 10,584
person
mail
L.C.
mail
Posted: 9/1/2012 4:34 PM
The real turning point happened well before it was visible on the scoreboard. In my mind, the real turning point came when Ohio put its first points on the board. With the score 7-3, Ohio knew they could score, and that they had withstood the intensity of PSU at the beginning. From that point on, it was all downhill for PSU, and all uphill for Ohio. Granted, because of a blocked punt, and a score by PSU the score got worse before it got better, but really, it was pretty much all Ohio.

From that point on, Ohio dominated both lines of scrimmage, and it took awhile to show up on the scoreboard, but eventually it did, as it usually does. Really, the score could have been worse. Weller only 1-3 on FG? I bet that doesn't happen again. Consider that the blocked punt was the only punt Ohio attempted in the last three quarters. The drives ended fg, missed fg, punt (blocked), half, td, td, missed fd, td, game end.

Before that FG, Ohio had 84 yards on 22 plays, an average of 3.8 yards a play. The rest of the game they got 415 more yards on 69 plays, over 6 yards a play. Meanwhile, after getting 169 yards on 26 plays in the first quarter, Penn State was held to 168 more yards the other three quarters combined.
Robert Fox
General User
RF
Member Since: 11/17/2004
Location: Knoxville, TN
Post Count: 2,039
person
mail
Robert Fox
mail
Posted: 9/1/2012 5:29 PM
Agree 1-3 on FGs will not likely be repeated. It looked like Weller was hurried on one or possibly both missed attempts. Not sure if he was hurried because of pressure, or simply hurried himself too much. Either way, it looked like his kick was forced, and you could tell he missed from the moment he struck the ball.
MedinaCat
General User
MC
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Lakewood, OH
Post Count: 750
person
mail
MedinaCat
mail
Posted: 9/1/2012 6:39 PM
Actually the momentum swung when Frank called a timeout with 2 seconds left in the first half. Nits got gassed running twice to the locker room.
GoCats105
General User
GC105
Member Since: 1/31/2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Post Count: 7,823
person
mail
GoCats105
mail
Posted: 9/1/2012 7:12 PM
L.C. wrote:expand_more
The real turning point happened well before it was visible on the scoreboard. In my mind, the real turning point came when Ohio put its first points on the board. With the score 7-3, Ohio knew they could score, and that they had withstood the intensity of PSU at the beginning. From that point on, it was all downhill for PSU, and all uphill for Ohio. Granted, because of a blocked punt, and a score by PSU the score got worse before it got better, but really, it was pretty much all Ohio.

From that point on, Ohio dominated both lines of scrimmage, and it took awhile to show up on the scoreboard, but eventually it did, as it usually does. Really, the score could have been worse. Weller only 1-3 on FG? I bet that doesn't happen again. Consider that the blocked punt was the only punt Ohio attempted in the last three quarters. The drives ended fg, missed fg, punt (blocked), half, td, td, missed fd, td, game end.

Before that FG, Ohio had 84 yards on 22 plays, an average of 3.8 yards a play. The rest of the game they got 415 more yards on 69 plays, over 6 yards a play. Meanwhile, after getting 169 yards on 26 plays in the first quarter, Penn State was held to 168 more yards the other three quarters combined.


L.C. on fire today.

I was really worried about this game until we finally put points on the board. Even when the punt got blocked I was ok with it, sort of, because I didn't feel like we would be punting much more in the game.

I just want to know why Tyler wasn't tucking and running on the read option more. I tweeted to Arkley early in the game and he didn't understand it either. Unless this is a new twist in the Pistol and we're saving TT for later in the year. Kudos to the O-line and Beau though, they were huge today.
L.C.
General User
LC
Member Since: 9/1/2005
Post Count: 10,584
person
mail
L.C.
mail
Posted: 9/1/2012 7:36 PM
To back up my point, I will repost the quarter by quarter stats. As I posted on another thread:
1st Qtr Ohio 47, Penn State 169
2d Qtr Ohio 146, Penn State 64
3rd Qtr Ohio 154, Penn State 64
4th Qtr Ohio 152, Penn State 66

Edit, also - in the first quarter, McGloin was 13-17 for 130 yards The remainder of the game he was 14-31 for 130 yards..
Last Edited: 9/1/2012 7:50:35 PM by L.C.
The Pessimist
General User
Member Since: 3/13/2005
Location: Allentown, PA
Post Count: 145
mail
The Pessimist
mail
Posted: 9/1/2012 7:44 PM
GoCats105 wrote:expand_more
I just want to know why Tyler wasn't tucking and running on the read option more. I tweeted to Arkley early in the game and he didn't understand it either. Unless this is a new twist in the Pistol and we're saving TT for later in the year. Kudos to the O-line and Beau though, they were huge today.


See other threads on this forum about Tettleton being the "stick that stirs the drink" of our offense? 

Penn State has some size and talent on defense.  Why expose yourself to some potentially brutal hits early on?  I like the call.  If he went out with a concussion, winning the game would have been much harder.  If he broke a leg, ala scrambling Mike Vick in Atlanta, what does our whole season look like?

Save those plays and those hits for when we need them.  If he doesn't run the ball again until December, that's fine by me.
Pataskala
General User
P
Member Since: 7/8/2010
Location: At least six feet away from anybody else
Post Count: 9,465
person
mail
Pataskala
mail
Posted: 9/1/2012 10:03 PM
Robert Fox wrote:expand_more
Agree 1-3 on FGs will not likely be repeated. It looked like Weller was hurried on one or possibly both missed attempts. Not sure if he was hurried because of pressure, or simply hurried himself too much. Either way, it looked like his kick was forced, and you could tell he missed from the moment he struck the ball.


I just wonder if it's because he has a new holder.  Not blaming the holder, but you get used to having someone there for you and it's strange when they leave.  He and Hershey had a real comfort level.
JSF
General User
Member Since: 1/29/2005
Location: Houston, TX
Post Count: 6,580
mail
JSF
mail
Posted: 9/1/2012 10:07 PM
Arkley's suggested that.
Cats-22
General User
C22
Member Since: 9/30/2006
Post Count: 370
person
mail
Cats-22
mail
Posted: 9/1/2012 10:20 PM
MedinaCat wrote:expand_more
Actually the momentum swung when Frank called a timeout with 2 seconds left in the first half. Nits got gassed running twice to the locker room.


I actually did like that timeout call.  Probably not a huge impact either way, but it left Penn State with a feeling of confusion heading into halftime.  Also, it made them defend for a play, and Ohio had essentially nothing to lose.

The big difference for me in the second half was the passing game connecting better.  There were some drops and some high throws in the first half, looked like first-game jitters.  I just counted this quickly but I think Tettleton was 15/22 in the first half, which is decent, but improved to an excellent 16/19 in the second half.
Jeff Johnson
General User
JJ
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Post Count: 186
person
mail
Jeff Johnson
mail
Posted: 9/1/2012 11:13 PM
To me, the turning point happened when the Ohio secondary started shutting down the PSU passing game, sometime in the 2nd quarter.  Their running game had already been effectively shut down by the end of the first quarter.  By the time the 3rd quarter rolled around, Ohio had fully adjusted to PSU's passing game, and it was left to Tettleton and Co. to seal the game by scoring points.  The real question remaining in the game was whether the Bobcats could break PSU's defense and score some points.

The statistics say it all.
Last Edited: 9/1/2012 11:21:25 PM by Jeff Johnson
giacomo
General User
G
Member Since: 11/20/2007
Post Count: 2,764
person
mail
giacomo
mail
Posted: 9/1/2012 11:36 PM

When you try to beat a team above your level it's important that you don't make mistakes. After we missed two field goals and had a punt blocked, I must admit I wasn't feeling postive. After all that, to win by 10 shows what a solid team we have. Winning on the road against a routine national power before a packed house is very impressive.

Showing Messages: 1 - 14 of 14
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)