The thing about playing a spread/air-raid team like Oklahoma State is that they don't really have a slow setting (this isn't a novel observation on my part). They can put in backups and bench warmers, but ultimately their offense is one that will rapidly move the ball down field if you're not breaking up passes/really covering receivers. Even their running plays, because of how much you have to sell out to cover against passes, tend to be high yardage affairs. Where this hurts them is in trying to burn clock to salt away a win.
On the plus side, it should also result in less wear and tear for the visiting team (at least for their D-line men) than it would if they were running it up the gut every play.
Not buying it. Oregon managed.
Oregon's opponent had a pulse. Savannah state managed less than 140 yards, and actually held the ball for almost 10 more minutes than Oklahoma State. I guess oklahoma state could have just started taking a knee in the 3rd or 4th quarters, but that seems
WAY more insulting to me than continuing to play something approaching your normal style with with backups in.
They don't play an especially physical style of play. I can't find the exact quote, but you don't stop shooting the ball when you're ahead in basketball, you don't stop swinging the bat (or stop throwing a variety of pitches) when you're ahead in baseball, you've got to do something in football, even if you're ahead. I guess they could have switched entirely to running "dive up the middle, dive up the middle, dive up the middle" but I think that runs, or at least seems to run, a greater liklihood of injury (to either your running back or the other team's D-linemen) than does continuing to pass.