ESPN uses a QBR rating, which includes more than just passing stats. It also factors in rushing yards, sacks, and penalties, and also adjust the rating from a "raw" number to adjust for the level of competition. As comparison data, Nathan Rourke rated 73.5, 77.6, and 75.3 from 2017-2019. Last year, Kurtis was rated 73.6, best in the MAC, and about the same as Nathan, but with more points from passing, and less points from rushing. I don't have data for Harris or Navarro for 2022.
Here is the data thus far for 2023:
Kurtis rated 71.9 against SDSU, which would be #1 in the MAC, about like last year
CJ Harris has a QBR so far of 51.5, which ranks him 5th in the MAC
CJ Harris was only 39.8 against SDSU, which would be 9th in the MAC
Parker Navarro has a QBR rating of 85.1, which would rank him #1 in the MAC
Harris clearly had a rough start against SDSU. He played much better against LIU. Navarro also played very well against LIU. While Kurtis is a potential NFL player, both Harris and Navarro appear to be at least average or better MAC level quarterbacks. I hope the coaches continue to find time for both of them to gain experience, so they can continue to improve, just in case something happens to Kurtis.
Last Edited: 9/6/2023 7:55:21 PM by L.C.