menu
Logo
Ohio Football Topic
Topic: Thank you Marshall
Page: 1 of 1
LoganElm_grad09
General User
LE09
Member Since: 9/9/2010
Location: South Bloomingville, OH
Post Count: 934
person
mail
LoganElm_grad09
mail
Posted: 9/16/2012 9:32 AM
I think that we should thank Marshall for a couple things. 

1)  The first thank you goes to Doc Holliday.  On two drives in the first half, he has us at 4th and 1 and decides to punt it away. 

2)  Every weakness we have on defense was exploited tonight.  Now, our coaches can see them to a full effect and correct them.
Pataskala
General User
P
Member Since: 7/8/2010
Location: At least six feet away from anybody else
Post Count: 9,465
person
mail
Pataskala
mail
Posted: 9/16/2012 10:44 AM
And thanks for having a team that plays more on emotion than headiness. The Terd was jacked at the start, but deflated pretty quickly after Ohio got a few first downs, and couldn't rebound from adversity late in the game.  A big plus for Ohio is their workman-like approach to the game.  Not a lot of highs, not a lot of lows, just steady calm throughout the game.
El Gato Roberto
General User
EGR
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Post Count: 1,220
person
mail
El Gato Roberto
mail
Posted: 9/16/2012 11:27 AM
Pataskala wrote:expand_more
And thanks for having a team that plays more on emotion than headiness. The Terd was jacked at the start, but deflated pretty quickly after Ohio got a few first downs, and couldn't rebound from adversity late in the game.  A big plus for Ohio is their workman-like approach to the game.  Not a lot of highs, not a lot of lows, just steady calm throughout the game.


Rivalry emotion aside...Marshall was a strong opponent.  Our team needed to dig deep to win.  Our margin of victory can be measured by the few more inches of air needed on that last pass by Cato to avoid the heroic reach of Wosley.  This was a great win for the cats over a worthy foe in a hostile environment.  I believe props are due The Herd...they played a great, great game .  Marshall did not lose..  Ohio WON.
Last Edited: 9/16/2012 11:28:29 AM by El Gato Roberto
OU didn't know
General User
ODK
Member Since: 3/20/2005
Post Count: 185
person
mail
OU didn't know
mail
Posted: 9/16/2012 12:00 PM
El Gato Roberto wrote:expand_more
And thanks for having a team that plays more on emotion than headiness. The Terd was jacked at the start, but deflated pretty quickly after Ohio got a few first downs, and couldn't rebound from adversity late in the game.  A big plus for Ohio is their workman-like approach to the game.  Not a lot of highs, not a lot of lows, just steady calm throughout the game.


Rivalry emotion aside...Marshall was a strong opponent.  Our team needed to dig deep to win.  Our margin of victory can be measured by the few more inches of air needed on that last pass by Cato to avoid the heroic reach of Wosley.  This was a great win for the cats over a worthy foe in a hostile environment.  I believe props are due The Herd...they played a great, great game .  Marshall did not lose..  Ohio WON.


I agree.  I didn't really have the chance to see Marshall play yet this year, so I was basing much of my opinion on the beating we delivered last year.  Cato is (already is?) going to be a stud.  He did a great job of making quick reads and delivering the ball on target the whole night.  Even though we knew Marshall was going to throw almost every down, we really couldn't get a consistent pass rush on him because of he got rid of the ball so quickly.

They have some impressive skill players too.  That offense is going to be hellish to deal with next year.  If they can manage to get anything resembling a decent RB that can help keep the defenses off balance, Marshall will be that much tougher to stop.

All that being said, it was great to see this team make plays when game was on the line.  For the most part, we just flat out didn't play very well.  I can't take any credit away from Marshall because they played a great game, but aside from that second quarter and the last TD drive, we couldn't establish much of a rhythm on offense.  Even still, Tettleton stepped up and made one of the most clutch throws I've ever seen considering the situation.  That touchdown on 4th and 5 couldn't have been thrown anymore perfect.  That's what big time players do.  They make plays with the game on the line.

Of course I can't forget the two huge TO's the D forced late in the game.  That fumble that set up the game winning field goal was just a case of the Bobcats wanting it more.  

The great thing about games like this is you can feel good about the win and beating a good team, but you can look back and realize that there's still a ton to improve on.  I'm sure Blankenship won't forget that fumble at the Marshall 30 when we potentially could have put that game away with a TD in the 3rd.

On another note, Boykin and Patterson need to be more involved in the game plan.  I really love Blankenship's shitfyness, but he'll be more effective if the carries are spread around a bit more.  Boykin and Daz are both great compliments to Blankenship.  Wouldn't mind seeing some more two back sets as well.
Monroe Slavin
General User
MS
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121
person
mail
Monroe Slavin
mail
Posted: 9/16/2012 1:58 PM
OU didn't know wrote:expand_more
On another note, Boykin and Patterson need to be more involved in the game plan.  I really love Blankenship's shitfyness, but he'll be more effective if the carries are spread around a bit more.  Boykin and Daz are both great compliments to Blankenship.  Wouldn't mind seeing some more two back sets as well.


My man!
Last Edited: 9/16/2012 1:59:19 PM by Monroe Slavin
Bcat2
General User
B2
Member Since: 7/6/2010
Post Count: 4,295
person
mail
Bcat2
mail
Posted: 9/16/2012 3:48 PM
Monroe Slavin wrote:expand_more
On another note, Boykin and Patterson need to be more involved in the game plan.  I really love Blankenship's shitfyness, but he'll be more effective if the carries are spread around a bit more.  Boykin and Daz are both great compliments to Blankenship.  Wouldn't mind seeing some more two back sets as well.


My man!


TT & any other back is a two back set.
El Gato Roberto
General User
EGR
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Post Count: 1,220
person
mail
El Gato Roberto
mail
Posted: 9/16/2012 3:51 PM
Bcat2 wrote:expand_more
TT & any other back is a two back set.
This!
AintBeenGood
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: OH
Post Count: 84
mail
AintBeenGood
mail
Posted: 9/17/2012 12:48 PM
Gave up way too many pass completions to Dotson (spelling?) Seems we have a weakness on DB"s play.
LoganElm_grad09
General User
LE09
Member Since: 9/9/2010
Location: South Bloomingville, OH
Post Count: 934
person
mail
LoganElm_grad09
mail
Posted: 9/17/2012 2:35 PM
I wonder how much of that was due to our coverages rather than just getting burned though.  I'm not extremely knowledgable outside the trenches and running game, so hopefully other members of the board can help me out on this one.
oucs 1986
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Mason, OH
Post Count: 251
mail
oucs 1986
mail
Posted: 9/17/2012 4:00 PM
It looked like the problem wasn't the DB per se, but it was the scheme.

We were giving a 15 to 18 yard cushion to the wide receivers, and that pretty much guaranteed the slant was open all night.

What it did do, though, was prevent the long touchdown.  This was, it appears, by design.

Let them move up and down the field between the 20s, but then as they get closer to the end zone, the cushion gets shorter, and looks a bit better.

This is generally how coaches defend receivers that are faster than the DBs.

There is no question that Cato is the real deal, and his longest pass was 40 yards. His average, though, was a far more pedestrian 6.6

Yes, it was an uncomfortable scheme... but it seems to have worked out fine.

GO BOBCATS!

-john
Showing Messages: 1 - 10 of 10
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)