menu
person
Create Account
Login
Bobcat Attack Menu
Basketball
Basketball News
Schedule/Results
Recruiting
Football
Football News
Schedule/Results
Recruiting
Message Board
Message Home
Basketball
Basketball Recruiting
Football
Football Recruiting
The O Zone
Volleyball
Baseball
Ohio Olympic Sports...
General OU Discussion...
Website Feedback...
Posting Policy
Chat
Site Links
Site Search
About Us
Contact Us
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Basketball
Basketball News
Schedule/Results
Recruiting
Football
Football News
Schedule/Results
Recruiting
Message Board
Message Home
Basketball
Basketball Recruiting
Football
Football Recruiting
The O Zone
Volleyball
Baseball
Ohio Olympic Sports...
General OU Discussion...
Website Feedback...
Posting Policy
Chat
Site Links
More...
Site Search
About Us
Contact Us
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
person
Create Account
Login
Ohio Football Topic
Message Home
Ohio Football
Topic:
D. Vick
Page:
1
of
1
Bobcatzblitz
General User
B
Member Since:
7/21/2010
Post Count:
1,777
person
mail
Bobcatzblitz
mail
Posted:
9/22/2012
3:09 PM
settings_applications
edit_note
Me likes this QB.
First Street Forever
General User
Member Since:
12/19/2010
Location:
Chicago, IL
Post Count:
247
mail
First Street Forever
mail
Posted:
9/22/2012
3:34 PM
settings_applications
edit_note
Me too.
The only thing I'm worried about is that Frank might feel a bit compelled to use the "Two-headed Monster" QB system that really retarded our QBs growth/effectiveness in the past.
I really doubt Frank would do it. This is TT's ship. He'll let him pilot it.
Athens
General User
A
Member Since:
12/20/2004
Location:
Alexandria, VA
Post Count:
5,454
person
mail
Athens
mail
Posted:
9/22/2012
3:54 PM
settings_applications
edit_note
Vick looks like an average 1st string MAC QB. Its all the tools in the offense around him that are making him look unstoppable. TT is a more complete QB and across all phases from passing to rushing the ball is a Top 10 FBS QB. The nice thing about the easy schedule this year is Ohio can save TT for the big games. They may as well keep him out next week against UMass if he's healing up as they are the worst team in FBS this season.
L.C.
General User
LC
Member Since:
9/1/2005
Post Count:
10,584
person
mail
L.C.
mail
Posted:
9/22/2012
4:21 PM
settings_applications
edit_note
Uncle Wes
wrote:
expand_more
Vick looks like an average 1st string MAC QB. Its all the tools in the offense around him that are making him look unstoppable. TT is a more complete QB and across all phases from passing to rushing the ball is a Top 10 FBS QB. The nice thing about the easy schedule this year is Ohio can save TT for the big games. They may as well keep him out next week against UMass if he's healing up as they are the worst team in FBS this season.
For Vick to look like "an average 1st string MAC QB" is a pretty great compliment considering it is just his second game, and his first full game. He has a lot of quality football ahead of him. No one thinks he is going to take the job from TT, but I bet everyone feels a lot more relaxed about what would happen if TT gets hurt.
anorris
General User
Member Since:
7/7/2010
Location:
Bristol, CT
Post Count:
2,262
mail
anorris
mail
Posted:
9/22/2012
5:14 PM
settings_applications
edit_note
I feel a lot better about Vick in his first lengthy appearance than I did with TT, and we see how that turned out.
perimeterpost
General User
Member Since:
7/6/2010
Post Count:
3,165
mail
perimeterpost
mail
Posted:
9/22/2012
5:21 PM
settings_applications
edit_note
Vick needs to two things- 1. Be able to hold it together if TT goes down this year or next. 2. Start 2014 as QB1 with little to no drop off from TT.
He's at or ahead schedule, looked good today.
Last Edited: 9/22/2012 9:33:36 PM by perimeterpost
sargentfan
General User
S
Member Since:
3/17/2005
Post Count:
917
person
mail
sargentfan
mail
Posted:
9/22/2012
6:43 PM
settings_applications
edit_note
This was the upside of scheduling a FCS opponent, got to rest TT so he is fresher for the MAC play run and we got to give real 1st string action to Vick and now we know he can effectively run the offense if he ever has to be called upon this season.
Bobcat Grad 86
General User
BG86
Member Since:
12/20/2004
Post Count:
1,397
person
mail
Bobcat Grad 86
mail
Posted:
9/22/2012
9:05 PM
settings_applications
edit_note
Derrius played a very solid game today.
Last Edited: 9/22/2012 9:14:16 PM by Bobcat Grad 86
Pataskala
General User
P
Member Since:
7/8/2010
Location:
At least six feet away from anybody else
Post Count:
9,465
person
mail
Pataskala
mail
Posted:
9/22/2012
9:19 PM
settings_applications
edit_note
I thought he did great. He wasn't forcing passes, he made good reads, and he controlled the offense well. I know he had short fields in the first Q but we've seen short fields go to waste. He made the most of them. Let's face it, this offense was made with T2 in mind, but I thought Vick handled it really well. I feel more comfortable about him stepping in if need be.
Jeff McKinney
Moderator
JM
Member Since:
11/12/2004
Post Count:
6,163
person
mail
Jeff McKinney
mail
Posted:
9/22/2012
9:35 PM
settings_applications
edit_note
L.C.
wrote:
expand_more
Uncle Wes
wrote:
expand_more
Vick looks like an average 1st string MAC QB. Its all the tools in the offense around him that are making him look unstoppable. TT is a more complete QB and across all phases from passing to rushing the ball is a Top 10 FBS QB. The nice thing about the easy schedule this year is Ohio can save TT for the big games. They may as well keep him out next week against UMass if he's healing up as they are the worst team in FBS this season.
For Vick to look like "an average 1st string MAC QB" is a pretty great compliment considering it is just his second game, and his first full game. He has a lot of quality football ahead of him. No one thinks he is going to take the job from TT, but I bet everyone feels a lot more relaxed about what would happen if TT gets hurt.
I agree.
Jeff McKinney
Moderator
JM
Member Since:
11/12/2004
Post Count:
6,163
person
mail
Jeff McKinney
mail
Posted:
9/22/2012
9:49 PM
settings_applications
edit_note
I thought Vick was extremely impressive today. It's nice to know we have a competent signal caller to back up TT.
L.C.
General User
LC
Member Since:
9/1/2005
Post Count:
10,584
person
mail
L.C.
mail
Posted:
9/22/2012
10:07 PM
settings_applications
edit_note
What was particularly impressive is that despite the pressure on him, he appeared very calm, and he played intelligently. I have seen plenty of QB's come in, and feel like they need to "make something happen", and when they try too hard to "make something happen", something usually does happen, and it isn't good. Vick had no turnovers, some nice passes, and some nice option plays, and he seemed to be making very good reads and audibles. All in all, for his first start, I'd give him an "A" for sure.
I was also impressed with him in the post-game interview. He seems like a very fine young man. Rumor has it that he's an excellent student, too. He's definitely an asset to the program.
Andrew Ruck
General User
Member Since:
12/22/2004
Location:
Columbus, OH
Post Count:
5,646
mail
Andrew Ruck
mail
Posted:
9/22/2012
11:17 PM
settings_applications
edit_note
He was good, about as good as youcould possibly expect a backup Qb in the MAC to be. The only negative I remember is a bad throw on a 3rd down with a wide open Roback.
The Quarterback picture for this 4 year stretch is crystal clear and I like it.
MonroeClassmate
General User
MC
Member Since:
8/31/2010
Post Count:
2,325
person
mail
MonroeClassmate
mail
Posted:
9/23/2012
8:19 PM
settings_applications
edit_note
Yes, nice job by the young man.
I wonder though in the 4th quarter why we didn't see another QB? Could the preferred walk-on run the offense considering he probably knows the other team's offense better from playing against the Ohio defense in practice all week?
TT played first year than sat second year.--so it is not like it hasn't worked before. With two freshman on the roster this year why not give the walk-on a few snaps as next year he'll likely be 3rd, 4th or 5th on the depth chart and the coaches may have missed any chance to give the kid some payback for his efforts for helping the team prepare for opponents and doing it when paying his own way.
Bert Presley
General User
Member Since:
12/20/2004
Location:
Where OHIO is winning and Miami is getting whipped, OH
Post Count:
370
mail
Bert Presley
mail
Posted:
9/23/2012
9:02 PM
settings_applications
edit_note
An intresting thing is, if we have an FCS as our second home game why not sit your QB after the 1st Quarter. Gets recruits saying "if I practice well I can be on a great team, and play" I know TT is the Captain, but it helps us think the ship will be fine down the road.
bobcatgrad
General User
Member Since:
12/20/2004
Location:
Nagoya, Japan
Post Count:
348
mail
bobcatgrad
mail
Posted:
9/24/2012
10:53 AM
settings_applications
edit_note
L.C.
wrote:
expand_more
I was also impressed with him in the post-game interview. He seems like a very fine young man. Rumor has it that he's an excellent student, too. He's definitely an asset to the program.
I noticed that as well. Besides playing incredibly well for it being his first start, he was very well spoken in the interview with Rob and Russ. Just gave me the impression that he is a very heady footballer. To early to judge, and I don't want to jinx him, but I am looking forward to seeing him develop his skills further on the field.
Unread Messages Remain
There are more unread messages in this topic.
Would you like to jump to the next unread message or return to the message listing?
Next Unread
Back to Listing
Showing Messages:
1
-
16
of
16
reply
vertical_align_top
vertical_align_center
vertical_align_bottom
add_comment
MAC News Links
chevron_left
Thursday, April 30, 2026
chevron_right
sports_football
Kemeni Jr. Drafted by BC Lions
Ohio Bobcats.com
sports_football
Ohio Football Alumnus Keye Thompson Joins 2026 Ohio Football Staff
Ohio Bobcats.com
User Login
Enter your login email and password below.
Email Address:
Password:
Login
Cancel
extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)