menu
Logo
Ohio Football Topic
Topic: Front flip penalty
Page: 1 of 1
perimeterpost
General User
Member Since: 7/6/2010
Post Count: 3,165
mail
perimeterpost
mail
Posted: 9/30/2012 3:00 AM
With less than 3 1/2 minutes left in the 4th quarter and Ohio up on UMass by 10 a UMass player scores a touchdown by doing a front flip into the end zone. A flag is thrown for unsportsman like conduct/excessive celebration and the call is reviewed in the booth. The booth confirms the ruling on the field that the flip was a foul,  but they say the penalty occurred after the play was dead (ball crossed the plane of the end zone)

  www.youtube.com/watch

In this recap video you can see the flip at 2:31. Clearly the runner begins his leap around the 4 yard line and as the ball breaks the plane his ankles are above his shoulders. How can that be ruled a penalty, but not be ruled a penalty until after the ball breaks the plane?

Am I understanding this rule right, should that not have been called back?
Bobcat110
General User
Member Since: 3/5/2005
Location: Mount Gilead, OH
Post Count: 724
mail
Bobcat110
mail
Posted: 9/30/2012 8:15 AM
Seemed more like a somersault, but I'm glad they didn't take the TD away.  It's a stupid rule.  I would not like winning the game and having everyone bringing up the TD called back.
Bobcatbob
General User
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Coolville, OH
Post Count: 1,351
mail
Bobcatbob
mail
Posted: 9/30/2012 8:31 AM
Bobcat110 wrote:expand_more
Seemed more like a somersault, but I'm glad they didn't take the TD away.  It's a stupid rule.  I would not like winning the game and having everyone bringing up the TD called back.


OK, but it's a rule and everyone on both teams (except this clown) knows that.  I think I could live with the "shame" of winning on a call I didnt agree with.   Ask Pete Carroll how he deals with it.
Shawn Sellers
General User
SS
Member Since: 1/5/2005
Location: Columbus, OH
Post Count: 228
person
mail
Shawn Sellers
mail
Posted: 9/30/2012 8:49 AM
perimeterpost wrote:expand_more
With less than 3 1/2 minutes left in the 4th quarter and Ohio up on UMass by 10 a UMass player scores a touchdown by doing a front flip into the end zone. A flag is thrown for unsportsman like conduct/excessive celebration and the call is reviewed in the booth. The booth confirms the ruling on the field that the flip was a foul,  but they say the penalty occurred after the play was dead (ball crossed the plane of the end zone)

  www.youtube.com/watch

In this recap video you can see the flip at 2:31. Clearly the runner begins his leap around the 4 yard line and as the ball breaks the plane his ankles are above his shoulders. How can that be ruled a penalty, but not be ruled a penalty until after the ball breaks the plane?

Am I understanding this rule right, should that not have been called back?


The call on the field was a dead ball foul and the ruling on the field was not confirmed by the booth, they said the call stood. That means there was not conclusive video evidence to confirm that the penalty occurred while still a live ball. It's hard to tell when the ball crosses the front of the goal line, as he stretches the ball out, and then pulls it back to start his flip.
L.C.
General User
LC
Member Since: 9/1/2005
Post Count: 10,584
person
mail
L.C.
mail
Posted: 9/30/2012 9:08 AM
I agree with  you - he started the somersault when he left the ground at the 4 yard line. It wasn't something he started after the ball crossed the plane. The call was probably wrong, but at this  point its water under the bridge.

Shawn Sellers wrote:expand_more
... It's hard to tell when the ball crosses the front of the goal line, as he stretches the ball out, and then pulls it back to start his flip.

The thing is, that's not how it works. You can't leave the ground, to dive, and suddenly, in mid-air, change your mind and decide to turn it into a flip - it's too late by that point. The entire dive was intended to be a flip from the moment he left the ground, and you can tell that because, as pointed out in the original post, but the time he stretched the ball out for the goal line, his feet were already higher than his head, and rising.

Edit - fixed typo
Last Edited: 9/30/2012 1:11:36 PM by L.C.
Pataskala
General User
P
Member Since: 7/8/2010
Location: At least six feet away from anybody else
Post Count: 9,465
person
mail
Pataskala
mail
Posted: 9/30/2012 9:46 AM
The fact that there's an Ohio player closing in from the left may have had something to do with the call.  He was entitled to leap to avoid the tackle but not do the flip in the end zone.  It's warped logic because either he meant to do the flip from the start or he didn't.  The TD should've been nullified and UMass should've had the ball around the 16 or 17.  Whether or not you agree with the rule, it's still the rule.
anorris
General User
Member Since: 7/7/2010
Location: Bristol, CT
Post Count: 2,262
mail
anorris
mail
Posted: 9/30/2012 10:05 AM
Whether you agree with the rule or not, if it is on the books it ought to be enforced. The TD should have been called back, period.

Reminded me of the Miami player who let go of the ball at the one a couple years ago in Oxford and it tumbled through the back of the end zone (except they got the call right).
The Optimist
General User
Member Since: 3/16/2007
Location: CLE
Post Count: 5,611
mail
The Optimist
mail
Posted: 9/30/2012 10:12 AM
I am glad they never T'd up Jeremy Fears.
Monroe Slavin
General User
MS
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121
person
mail
Monroe Slavin
mail
Posted: 9/30/2012 12:48 PM
Who gives a flip about the flip.  Now if you want to discuss Ohio defenders slipping and falling, getting juked around all day, and missing a ton of tackles..then we have a worthy conversation.
L.C.
General User
LC
Member Since: 9/1/2005
Post Count: 10,584
person
mail
L.C.
mail
Posted: 9/30/2012 1:14 PM
Monroe we don't care about the flip - we are just pointing out that the referees did not get the call correctly according to the rules. Whether you agree with the rule is totally another thing.
Deciduous Forest Cat
General User
DFC
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: OH
Post Count: 4,559
person
mail
Deciduous Forest Cat
mail
Posted: 9/30/2012 2:22 PM
Maybe it was just karma after Harden's unnecessary dive into the endzone last year against Temple, although defenders were close enough to warrant picking up the flag.
Last Edited: 9/30/2012 2:22:51 PM by Deciduous Forest Cat
Monroe Slavin
General User
MS
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121
person
mail
Monroe Slavin
mail
Posted: 9/30/2012 3:39 PM
Understood, L.C.  My interest is just more in the things that we can control (to some extent).
L.C.
General User
LC
Member Since: 9/1/2005
Post Count: 10,584
person
mail
L.C.
mail
Posted: 9/30/2012 4:17 PM
FWIW, the kid who did it acknowledged after the game that it was stupid, that he shouldn't have done it, and that it would never happen again.
OUVan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Bethesda, MD
Post Count: 5,580
mail
OUVan
mail
Posted: 10/1/2012 2:37 PM
anorris wrote:expand_more
Whether you agree with the rule or not, if it is on the books it ought to be enforced. The TD should have been called back, period.


I have absolutely no problem with them not making the call in that situation.   It's a complete  CS rule.  I have no problem with a penalty being called but taking a score away is ridiculous.  Yes, by the letter of the law it should have been taken off the board but if we are going to start calling everything by the letter of the law there would be holding on every single play.   I have a feeling that if it were called against us the feeling of this board would be considerably different than it is now.
C Money
General User
Member Since: 8/28/2010
Post Count: 3,420
mail
C Money
mail
Posted: 10/1/2012 4:35 PM
L.C. wrote:expand_more
FWIW, the kid who did it acknowledged after the game that it was stupid, that he shouldn't have done it, and that it would never happen again.



I have it on good authority that orders to be at the stadium at 6 AM to run steps will generally change a player's attitude, but that a swift and unequivocal apology sometimes avoids the necessity of punitive conditioning.
L.C.
General User
LC
Member Since: 9/1/2005
Post Count: 10,584
person
mail
L.C.
mail
Posted: 10/1/2012 5:26 PM
..or at least reduces the amounts of it.
Showing Messages: 1 - 16 of 16
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)