You're correct, its basically so that we don't give up the "big play", don't get beaten deep.
Well, pretty soon we're gonna get beat by loosin' way too many shorts.
You'd rather lose be giving up a ton of downfield passes? It clearly isn't an optimal solution, I think its more a reaction to having 962 scholarship defensive backs out due to injury.
Who 'wants to lose" by any regular method? That was the point of my original proposition - maybe this is indeed the "plan". I don't think it works in most games going forward though - therefore the concern. As others have also posted - this requires the D Line Really stepping up - and i think they have the potential to do that.
Try and be objective about the relative strenghts of the D, right now.
The D-Line is, in my opinion, the strength of the D, right now.
The linebackers next
The secondary is last.
Given these realities, my opinion is the D scheme is right, for right now.
When the D line gets pressure on the QB, the softness of the secondary won't look as bad, because he can't sit back there for the throw...
No pressure and it looks really, really, bad.
-john