menu
Logo
Ohio Football Topic
Topic: Do I sound spoiled?
Page: 2 of 2
GoCats105
General User
GC105
Member Since: 1/31/2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Post Count: 7,823
person
mail
GoCats105
mail
Posted: 10/1/2012 8:09 AM
anorris wrote:expand_more
We ran into a combination of things Saturday, I think.  My abbreviated thoughts:

TT not 100% hurts, but even at 80%, he's a very solid QB who takes phenomenal care of the ball.

Beau is a workhorse, but I hope Boykin can get back quickly -- he could use a breather as the season goes on.

Our secondary is missing a lot of key pieces.  I imagine that contributes to a game plan of leaving a bigger cushion and keeping everything in front of them.  Can't say I disagree with the plan, given the hand we've been dealt.

We didn't play our best, but UMass is also, I think, better than most give them credit for.  I think they'll win a couple games in the conference this year.

Many people who seemed flabbergasted by missed tackles don't seem aware that their two biggest players on the offensive side are grad student transfers from Notre Dame (WR #3, Deion Walker) and Michigan (RB #5, Michael Cox).  Together, those two accounted for 242 yards, or very near half the team's offense, and the bulk of the big plays.


Not to mention Ohio was playing its third road game in five and traveling to a virtual unknown. They won the game that's all that matters. Sure UMass was an FCS school last year, but there is a reason they moved up.
Monroe Slavin
General User
MS
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121
person
mail
Monroe Slavin
mail
Posted: 10/1/2012 10:23 AM
True.

Except that we should have won by 14-17 points.
GoCats105
General User
GC105
Member Since: 1/31/2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Post Count: 7,823
person
mail
GoCats105
mail
Posted: 10/1/2012 11:33 AM
Monroe Slavin wrote:expand_more
True.

Except that we should have won by 14-17 points.


Probably, given the talent level and continuity of the program. But, games are played on the field and not paper as we have all discovered many times.

Look at UTSA. First year FBS is now 5-0 and crushed New Mexico State on the road. How do you think they feel? UTSA might not win another game on the schedule, as they've played a ton of FCS opponents to get to 5-0 and are now in the meat of their WAC schedule.
RSBobcat
General User
Member Since: 8/23/2010
Location: Columbus, OH
Post Count: 4,504
mail
RSBobcat
mail
Posted: 10/1/2012 11:25 PM
anorris wrote:expand_more
We ran into a combination of things Saturday, I think.  My abbreviated thoughts:

TT not 100% hurts, but even at 80%, he's a very solid QB who takes phenomenal care of the ball.

Beau is a workhorse, but I hope Boykin can get back quickly -- he could use a breather as the season goes on.

Our secondary is missing a lot of key pieces.  I imagine that contributes to a game plan of leaving a bigger cushion and keeping everything in front of them.  Can't say I disagree with the plan, given the hand we've been dealt.

We didn't play our best, but UMass is also, I think, better than most give them credit for.  I think they'll win a couple games in the conference this year.

Many people who seemed flabbergasted by missed tackles don't seem aware that their two biggest players on the offensive side are grad student transfers from Notre Dame (WR #3, Deion Walker) and Michigan (RB #5, Michael Cox).  Together, those two accounted for 242 yards, or very near half the team's offense, and the bulk of the big plays.


Good cogent points. The Green Kool-Aid is tasting sweeter the farther away we get from 9/29/12.............. 
Monroe Slavin
General User
MS
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121
person
mail
Monroe Slavin
mail
Posted: 10/2/2012 12:02 AM
Monroe Slavin wrote:expand_more
True.

Except that we should have won by 14-17 points.
Showing Messages: 26 - 30 of 30
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)