menu
Logo
Ohio Football Topic
Topic: Shout out for the O line
Page: 1 of 1
Pataskala
General User
P
Member Since: 7/8/2010
Location: At least six feet away from anybody else
Post Count: 9,465
person
mail
Pataskala
mail
Posted: 10/3/2012 9:45 AM
With all the discussion of Beau, we've neglected to give some real credit to the O line.  They're a big reason why Ohio is 22nd in the US in rushing (224 ypg) and tied for 10th in sacks allowed (3 in 5 games).  The line play is where games are won or lost, and these guys are doing super.
oucs 1986
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Mason, OH
Post Count: 251
mail
oucs 1986
mail
Posted: 10/3/2012 10:42 AM
Pataskala wrote:expand_more
With all the discussion of Beau, we've neglected to give some real credit to the O line. They're a big reason why Ohio is 22nd in the US in rushing (224 ypg) and tied for 10th in sacks allowed (3 in 5 games). The line play is where games are won or lost, and these guys are doing super.
I concur.

-John
chauncey1
General User
C1
Member Since: 7/11/2010
Post Count: 17
person
mail
chauncey1
mail
Posted: 10/3/2012 10:44 AM
+1
L.C.
General User
LC
Member Since: 9/1/2005
Post Count: 10,584
person
mail
L.C.
mail
Posted: 10/3/2012 10:50 AM
It's also true that the future there looks bright, too. The grades for the Freshmen backups, when they have been in, have been very good, better, in fact, than the grades of the current starters when they were Freshmen. A few years from now, when we are looking at a line consisting of McQueen, Lucas, Powell, Dietz, and others, it projects to be every bit as good as the current one.
Kinggeorge4
General User
Member Since: 12/22/2004
Location: Guysville, OH
Post Count: 1,087
mail
Kinggeorge4
mail
Posted: 10/3/2012 10:51 AM
This group has been awesome.  They have opened holes for our running backs and have given TT enough time to pick defenses apart.  They should be our MVPs.
PA Bobcat Fan
General User
PBF
Member Since: 9/20/2005
Post Count: 78
person
mail
PA Bobcat Fan
mail
Posted: 10/3/2012 1:14 PM
After watching the replay of the Penn State game, I was amazed at how our O line was able to open it up for Beau in the second half of the game.

They are a big reason that he is having such a tremendous season so far.

Hats off to ALL of the offense for "bringing it" when we need it.
GoCats105
General User
GC105
Member Since: 1/31/2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Post Count: 7,823
person
mail
GoCats105
mail
Posted: 10/3/2012 4:40 PM
I mentioned this in the preseason, but when Phil Steele is ranking three of our linemen in his Top 50 rankings, that's huge. Two Guards, Lechner and Herman, and Center Allen made his list. That's pretty good for any program let alone a MAC school.
Brian Smith (No, not that one)
General User
BSNNTO
Member Since: 2/4/2005
Post Count: 3,057
person
mail
Brian Smith (No, not that one)
mail
Posted: 10/3/2012 8:44 PM
Iit's hard to believe that Ohio went from a team that could hardly get three yards a pop a few years ago to this. Was it getting linemen fit for this blocking scheme? Health? Experience? A few years ago, Ohio was the worst third and short team I've ever rooted for. Now they're automatic.
L.C.
General User
LC
Member Since: 9/1/2005
Post Count: 10,584
person
mail
L.C.
mail
Posted: 10/3/2012 9:19 PM
GoCats105 wrote:expand_more
I mentioned this in the preseason, but when Phil Steele is ranking three of our linemen in his Top 50 rankings, that's huge. Two Guards, Lechner and Herman, and Center Allen made his list. That's pretty good for any program let alone a MAC school.

Lechner will be All-MAC, but not this year, because he's not even starting, at least, most games. Carlotta, Herman, and Allen all deserve consideration for All-MAC, but so does McGrath, who is having an amazing first year as a starter, and Prior is playing well, too. It wouldn't surprise me if Herman gets drafted, either.

As an aside, it's a shame the old Bobcatattack archives have been deleted. When the offer was made to Herman, some clown came on and posted ad nauseam about what a mistake Ohio had made, and how his friend was a much better choice, and that Herman would be awful... I'd love to go back and find that thread and see whatever happened to the guy that clown was touting as better than Herman.

Back on subject, the offensive line has shown steady improvement over the last 8 years. The way I see it, the initial line, in 2005, was pretty good...until the BG game, when 3 starters were injured in one 5 minute period, and there was really no one behind them. From that point on it was a struggle. The 2005 class had a lot of linemen, but you don't take a high school kid and turn him into a college level player overnight. It takes years in the weight room. Unfortunately, a lot of those early players had career ending injuries, so it was 2 steps forward, 1 step back. Paul Johnson, Flowers, Laudermilch, Black, Britain, Philbin, Bunner, and Ferrainolo and just some of the names I recall of injured linemen. Each year, however, the quality of the recruits kept getting better, and that seems to still be true. Thus I don't think that the line quality has peaked yet - it is still getting better and better.
GoCats105
General User
GC105
Member Since: 1/31/2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Post Count: 7,823
person
mail
GoCats105
mail
Posted: 10/4/2012 7:47 AM
Brian Smith wrote:expand_more
Iit's hard to believe that Ohio went from a team that could hardly get three yards a pop a few years ago to this. Was it getting linemen fit for this blocking scheme? Health? Experience? A few years ago, Ohio was the worst third and short team I've ever rooted for. Now they're automatic.


I would say it's probably a combination of all those things. But even more important: DEPTH.
Valley Cat
General User
Member Since: 12/28/2004
Location: Jackson Twp., OH
Post Count: 1,246
mail
Valley Cat
mail
Posted: 10/5/2012 7:06 AM
L.C.
General User
LC
Member Since: 9/1/2005
Post Count: 10,584
person
mail
L.C.
mail
Posted: 10/5/2012 1:31 PM
One thing I remember reading about was that the offensive line set up an "Offensive Line Olympics" or something during the off-season, with competition between them on a variety of things. It wasn't for the benefit of anyone but them, and results weren't really announced, but it sounded like something they did on their own initiative, and seemed like a great way of building camaraderie, plus motivating them to work harder.
Monroe Slavin
General User
MS
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121
person
mail
Monroe Slavin
mail
Posted: 10/5/2012 2:18 PM
CUPCAKES AND DONUTS!





(universal top tier business motivational tools)
Nash'Cat
General User
Member Since: 3/29/2012
Location: Nashville, TN
Post Count: 156
mail
Nash'Cat
mail
Posted: 10/5/2012 4:48 PM
Recruiting for the offensive line keeps getting better, too:
"Leavitt is a 6-foot-7-inch, 300-pound lineman who has impressive footwork. Murdock is slightly smaller at 6 foot 4 inches and only about 290 pounds, but is still a solid offensive lineman who has experience blocking in an up-tempo offense and currently protects (2013 QB Commit James) Walsh’s blindside at Dublin Coffman. Murdock and Leavitt provide Ohio with an imposing set of bookend tackles that have the potential to develop into key members of the o-line in the span of their careers at Ohio.
The giant of the group is Bristol, though, who at 6 foot 4 inches, weighs over 320 pounds and explodes off the line at the guard position. 'I felt Ohio was the best fit for me because they pride themselves on their offensive line and (they have) great coaches,' Bristol stated. 'They all seem to play as a unit, they are a family, no individuals.' "

I think I like these guys already :)

http://www.woub.org/2012/10/04/ohio-building-brand-through-recruiting

edited in source
Last Edited: 10/5/2012 4:49:05 PM by Nash'Cat
OhioCatFan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 15,700
mail
OhioCatFan
mail
Posted: 10/5/2012 10:48 PM
A question or two about the OL's improvement over the last few years.  I remember a few years ago there were several threads on BA that referred to the fact that at the time we were converting from man blocking on the OL to zone blocking.  Did this change occur? (I think I can see a difference, but it's kind of subtle.  It does look to me like the left and the right sides of the line block more as a unit rather than as individuals, which looks like what I think zone blocking would look like, but I really don't know what I'm talking about here.)  If the change did occur, to what extent has this been a factor in the improved performance of our line?
EyePatchSolich
General User
Member Since: 7/27/2012
Post Count: 9
mail
EyePatchSolich
mail
Posted: 10/5/2012 11:04 PM
Do not forget to credit Coach keven Lightner. In my opinion, the o-line has been one of the most consistent position groups in the program.
Showing Messages: 1 - 16 of 16
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)