The fact that the ND administration is mad that the “ACC turned their back on their biggest partner”, shows how out of touch and self absorbed they are! They obviously expect the ACC to lobby against their own member, a member who actually beat ND.
I'm pretty sure ND was upset that the ACC singled them out when lobbying for Miami. They could have gone after Alabama and Oklahoma as well and lobbied for both Miami and ND to get in.
How I took it as well.
If those are your final two teams, I can see how it could be a toss-up. But I would've leaned on Notre Dame.
In my eyes, Miami shouldn't be there. Should ND? They're ranked #9. So, yeah that would be my first qualifier. Some guys decided they disagreed with the AP voters and put Miami over them due to a 3-point loss in August.
I do like the bowl commissioner guy saying it came down to head-to-head. Wish we had him in charge of the MAC. BUT winning in week one, barely, isn't the empirical evidence I'm looking for here. Miami lost to Louisville and SMU. Notre Dame has two losses vs CFP teams - Miami (#10) and Texas A&M (#7).
And if you're still staring at the data, can't decide between the two going I have both at "95.5 points", I'm still probably giving ND the nod. Lets call it strength of losses, like they did to us. But it's hard to argue against the head-to-head. I think it's just harder to use head-to-head when its from Week 1.
And if I'm Duke. I'm throwing a fit.