menu
Logo
Ohio Football Topic
Topic: Respect?
Page: 2 of 3
perimeterpost
General User
Member Since: 7/6/2010
Post Count: 3,165
mail
perimeterpost
mail
Posted: 10/15/2012 10:36 AM
again with this MAC West propaganda about Ohio getting lucky with an easier schedule. It's nonsense. Look at our schedule compared to NIU-

OOC-
NIU- Iowa(4-2), Tenn-Mart(FCS), @Army(1-5), Kansas(1-5)
Ohio- @Penn State(4-2), Norfolk St(FCS), @Marshall(2-4), NMSU(1-5)

Conference-
We share 5/8 common opponents- EMU, Ball State, Akron, Buffalo, UMass
NIU- Toledo(6-1),  @WMU(3-4), CMU(2-4)
Ohio- @Kent St(5-1), BGSU(4-3), @Miami (3-4)

Now, you show me where OUr schedule is sooo much easier. I would argue that OUrs is MORE difficult.


Toledo's isn't much better-
OOC- @Arizona(3-3), Coastal Carolina(FCS), @Wyoming(1-5), Cincinnati(5-0)

Conference-
We share 5/8 opponents- EMU, Ball State, Akron, Buffalo, BGSU
Toledo- @NIU(6-1), @WMU(3-4), CMU(2-4)
Ohio- @Kent St(5-1), @Miami(3-4), @UMass(0-6)

Toledo has 1 better game in their OOC and their conference schedule is slightly better with them playing CMU instead of UMass, but again, over all, is this soooo much tougher than OUrs?

Every MAC West school plays 5 MAC West teams, if we make it to the MACC we will have played 3 MAC West teams. I'm sorry, but our schedule is not soooo much easier because we avoided WMU and CMU. It's just not. And our OOC is right up there with the rest of them. @PSU is still the best win by a MAC team this year to date.

So please, when a MAC West fan tries to shame you into thinking  we've got it easy, don't believe the hype.
mf279801
General User
M279801
Member Since: 8/6/2010
Location: Newark, DE
Post Count: 2,486
person
mail
mf279801
mail
Posted: 10/15/2012 10:41 AM
perimeterpost wrote:expand_more
again with this MAC West propaganda about Ohio getting lucky with an easier schedule. It's nonsense. Look at our schedule compared to NIU-

OOC-
NIU- Iowa(4-2), Tenn-Mart(FCS), @Army(1-5), Kansas(1-5)
Ohio- @Penn State(4-2), Norfolk St(FCS), @Marshall(2-4), NMSU(1-5)

Conference-
We share 5/8 common opponents- EMU, Ball State, Akron, Buffalo, UMass
NIU- Toledo(6-1),  @WMU(3-4), CMU(2-4)
Ohio- @Kent St(5-1), BGSU(4-3), @Miami (3-4)

Now, you show me where OUr schedule is sooo much easier. I would argue that OUrs is MORE difficult.


Toledo's isn't much better-
OOC- @Arizona(3-3), Coastal Carolina(FCS), @Wyoming(1-5), Cincinnati(5-0)

Conference-
We share 5/8 opponents- EMU, Ball State, Akron, Buffalo, BGSU
Toledo- @NIU(6-1), @WMU(3-4), CMU(2-4)
Ohio- @Kent St(5-1), @Miami(3-4), @UMass(0-6)

Toledo has 1 better game in their OOC and their conference schedule is slightly better with them playing CMU instead of UMass, but again, over all, is this soooo much tougher than OUrs?

Every MAC West school plays 5 MAC West teams, if we make it to the MACC we will have played 3 MAC West teams. I'm sorry, but our schedule is not soooo much easier because we avoided WMU and CMU. It's just not. And our OOC is right up there with the rest of them. @PSU is still the best win by a MAC team this year to date.

So please, when a MAC West fan tries to shame you into thinking  we've got it easy, don't believe the hype.


I think they mean schedule to date (i.e. only counting the OCC + UMASS, Buffalo, and Akron). SOS at the end of the season and halfway through the season are two different things.
L.C.
General User
LC
Member Since: 9/1/2005
Post Count: 10,584
person
mail
L.C.
mail
Posted: 10/15/2012 12:39 PM
GoCats105 wrote:expand_more
...Ball State had more double-digit wins than us in 2008, so I can see why people think we don't deserve it.

Ball State had a nice team that year, and yes, not a difficult schedule. I caused a few raised eyebrows around here when I predicted before the season that they would go undefeated that year because of those facts. The key thing, however, is that the day came when they woke up in a ditch, courtesy of Buffalo. In the end, that will be the determining fate for Ohio, too. The question won't be "did they have enough double digit wins?", it will be, "did they wake up in a ditch?"
Brian Smith (No, not that one)
General User
BSNNTO
Member Since: 2/4/2005
Post Count: 3,057
person
mail
Brian Smith (No, not that one)
mail
Posted: 10/15/2012 2:58 PM
Until Ohio wins a MAC Championship game, I don't expect the rest of the conference to be impressed. That's not unreasonable, either.
MonroeClassmate
General User
MC
Member Since: 8/31/2010
Post Count: 2,325
person
mail
MonroeClassmate
mail
Posted: 10/15/2012 7:48 PM
Can Ohio help it that Temple exited and was replaced with UMass?  Ohio would be 7-0 with road wins over PSU, Marshall and a sold out stadium in Phily!


Cat4ever
General User
C4
Member Since: 12/29/2007
Location: Oakland, FL
Post Count: 447
person
mail
Cat4ever
mail
Posted: 10/16/2012 8:30 AM
There was a nice piece on Cleveland.com Sunday concerning BG (which does not suck in 2012). Within in the story, it notes that while the Falcons are "only" 4-3, the losses are to teams with a combined record of 16-4 (Florida, Virginia Tech and Toledo). My recollection is that BG also came into the season with the most-veteran starting group in the MAC. Not to sound like the PR guy for BG, but: They are "the deal."

That we are playing them in Athens is nice, but I've been disappointed by the outcome of "home" games enough to know playing at Peden does not assure a win.

Not to rain on OUr parade, but: There are four dates ahead that require OUr "A game" and perhaps some luck to go with it. While I've seen enough to be satisfied this is a nice team, I've also seen enough to doubt the "run" and ranking will endure the season.

It would be nice to "eat crow," but I'm just not seeing a feast on Redhawks, Falcons, Eagles, Cardinals and Golden Flashes. That is an awful lot of bird -- even for an attack 'Cat!  
Last Edited: 10/16/2012 8:31:23 AM by Cat4ever
Ozcat
General User
Member Since: 1/4/2005
Location: Gahanna, OH
Post Count: 820
mail
Ozcat
mail
Posted: 10/16/2012 12:23 PM
I finished making the rounds of a few other message boards.  In my opinion, what they are currently spouting off about is justified, however, very few of them have paid close enough attention to understand that we have been decimated on defense with injuries.

I love the 7-0 record, but even with the #25 ranking I'm still having a hard time knowing that we've barely gotten past 3 pretty bad teams.  A win is a win, and I get it, but I'd really like to roll into Oxford and grab a 20 point victory with a better showing from what is hopefully a healthy defense.
Victory
General User
V
Member Since: 3/11/2012
Post Count: 2,519
person
mail
Victory
mail
Posted: 10/16/2012 1:43 PM
If, for instance, Michigan, who is another team just inside the Top 25, had played three straight one score games against three of the bottom ten programs in the FBS, injuries or no injuries, do we think that they would be treated by the polls any differently?

Would any school in the country have gained much ground at all beating, say, Idaho, Florida Atlantic, and South Alabama by one score in three straight weeks?  It isn't a disrespect for the MAC thing.  On our resume for the Top 25 there is a good win over Penn State on the road and since we didn't play well at all in most of the other games but didn't lose any of the them either there is nothing much else in the resume to add or detract too much from our resume being just a win over Penn State.
cincybobcat99
General User
C99
Member Since: 11/8/2007
Post Count: 192
person
mail
cincybobcat99
mail
Posted: 10/16/2012 2:08 PM
Ozcat wrote:expand_more
I love the 7-0 record, but even with the #25 ranking I'm still having a hard time knowing that we've barely gotten past 3 pretty bad teams.  A win is a win, and I get it, but I'd really like to roll into Oxford and grab a 20 point victory with a better showing from what is hopefully a healthy defense.


+1
PalmerFest
General User
PF
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 399
person
mail
PalmerFest
mail
Posted: 10/16/2012 2:55 PM
I know the final scores for the last two games do not look impressive, but I never had the sense that either outcome was ever in doubt.  I would not consider that barely winning but I respect your opinion we can agree to disagree. 
Deciduous Forest Cat
General User
DFC
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: OH
Post Count: 4,559
person
mail
Deciduous Forest Cat
mail
Posted: 10/16/2012 3:03 PM
cincybobcat99 wrote:expand_more
I love the 7-0 record, but even with the #25 ranking I'm still having a hard time knowing that we've barely gotten past 3 pretty bad teams.  A win is a win, and I get it, but I'd really like to roll into Oxford and grab a 20 point victory with a better showing from what is hopefully a healthy defense.


+1


No doubt the D has taken their lumps in recent weeks but if our offense executes a little better in the 4th quarter, we have much more convincing looking wins. Akron doesn't hit 28 points and Umass and Buffalo sure don't get into the 30s.
NIU007b
General User
NIU007
Member Since: 11/26/2011
Post Count: 69
person
mail
NIU007b
mail
Posted: 10/16/2012 4:24 PM
Ozcat wrote:expand_more
I finished making the rounds of a few other message boards.  In my opinion, what they are currently spouting off about is justified, however, very few of them have paid close enough attention to understand that we have been decimated on defense with injuries.

I love the 7-0 record, but even with the #25 ranking I'm still having a hard time knowing that we've barely gotten past 3 pretty bad teams.  A win is a win, and I get it, but I'd really like to roll into Oxford and grab a 20 point victory with a better showing from what is hopefully a healthy defense.


I'm aware you've had a lot of injuries, particularly in the secondary. Sometimes people scoff at that because everyone has injuries. But if your secondary is decimated, or you lose your QB (like WMU) then the score of your games becomes less predictive of future resutls if you get those players back.  I get that. NIU had that in 2007 (we weren't great to begin with but that made it a ton worse) - and no one remembers that now except for NIU fans.

I for one am glad Ohio is ranked in at least one poll. They'll get more credit if they beat Kent State as they look good this year. And if they win against whomever comes out of the West in the MACC.  As for whether they deserve to be ranked, no one will know until the end of the year - same with many other ranked teams.

As for the other message boards, a few posts from a couple Ohio fans kind of stirred up the hornet's nest.
L.C.
General User
LC
Member Since: 9/1/2005
Post Count: 10,584
person
mail
L.C.
mail
Posted: 10/16/2012 4:55 PM
NIU007b wrote:expand_more
... As for whether they deserve to be ranked, no one will know until the end of the year - same with many other ranked teams....

Exactly. The votes now are just for fun. In the end it is the W or L that people remember. I'd rather be 14-0 with a lot of close wins than 12-2 with a lot of double digit wins, and ending with two losses.

As for the secondary, many of the players are out for the season. Improvement in the secondary will come as the Freshmen/Sophomores who have been thrust into the role of starters gain experience, not because of returning players. Omar Leftwich, Travie Carrie, and Jamal Shaw (top three corners last year) will not be returning. Gerald Moore FS and Josh Kristoff SS should be back, and probably both will start against Miami. Xavier Hughes SS may or may not be out for the season.

Whether from returning players, or younger players gaining experience, I expect the secondary to continue to improve as the year progresses.
The Optimist
General User
Member Since: 3/16/2007
Location: CLE
Post Count: 5,611
mail
The Optimist
mail
Posted: 10/16/2012 5:59 PM
NIU007b wrote:expand_more
I finished making the rounds of a few other message boards.  In my opinion, what they are currently spouting off about is justified, however, very few of them have paid close enough attention to understand that we have been decimated on defense with injuries.

I love the 7-0 record, but even with the #25 ranking I'm still having a hard time knowing that we've barely gotten past 3 pretty bad teams.  A win is a win, and I get it, but I'd really like to roll into Oxford and grab a 20 point victory with a better showing from what is hopefully a healthy defense.


As for the other message boards, a few posts from a couple Ohio fans kind of stirred up the hornet's nest.


Guilty.

I wasn't aware the rest of the MAC doesn't consider booting EMU an acceptable option to improve the conference.  The rest of the MAC fans made in pretty clear to me they aren't willing to do what is necessary to advance the conference.

This was after the original post about respect though...
Last Edited: 10/16/2012 6:00:15 PM by The Optimist
JSF
General User
Member Since: 1/29/2005
Location: Houston, TX
Post Count: 6,580
mail
JSF
mail
Posted: 10/16/2012 6:21 PM
You've been a complete and total jerk about the whole thing. And you realize we have ZERO say in the matter, right?

Nevermind it wouldn't actually improve the conference in any way and weakens the MAC in  few sports.
Last Edited: 10/16/2012 6:22:57 PM by JSF
The Optimist
General User
Member Since: 3/16/2007
Location: CLE
Post Count: 5,611
mail
The Optimist
mail
Posted: 10/16/2012 6:29 PM
JSF wrote:expand_more
You've been a complete and total jerk about the whole thing.

True.
Quote:expand_more
And you realize we have ZERO say in the matter, right?

Not true.  Members of the MAC are what drive this conference.  If the majority of members were on the same page, everything could be completely reformed.
Quote:expand_more
Nevermind it wouldn't actually improve the conference in any way

lol
Quote:expand_more
and weakens the MAC in  few sports.

Yes, as we have seen from recent conference realignments these sports are what matters.  Listen, I love the smaller sports as much as anyone.  In fact, the sport I would've played at Ohio got dropped a couple years ago in Ohio's latest round of drops.  My mom played that same sport at Ohio, and it still exists on the women's side.  But lets not pretend those sports drive what happens in conferences...  They do not matter in the context of the discussion, as much as we all wish they did to make people feel better.
JSF
General User
Member Since: 1/29/2005
Location: Houston, TX
Post Count: 6,580
mail
JSF
mail
Posted: 10/16/2012 6:45 PM
No, the university presidents drive the conference. Good luck getting in their ears. And I assume you'd be willing to kick in for the inevitable litigation?
The Optimist
General User
Member Since: 3/16/2007
Location: CLE
Post Count: 5,611
mail
The Optimist
mail
Posted: 10/16/2012 6:52 PM
JSF wrote:expand_more
No, the university presidents drive the conference. Good luck getting in their ears. And I assume you'd be willing to kick in for the inevitable litigation?

Who do university presidents report to? And who do those people report to?

It would not be difficult to finance the costs of litigation out over the the long-term when the lawsuit fails and we see a significant increase in cash flows with EMU out of the conference.
JSF
General User
Member Since: 1/29/2005
Location: Houston, TX
Post Count: 6,580
mail
JSF
mail
Posted: 10/16/2012 6:56 PM
So you want us to organize a letter writing campaign to Gov. Kasich? I'm sure he'll give it the consideration it deserves.

Booting Eastern Michigan is going to result in a significant increase in cash flow? You're simply not operating from a realistic standpoint.
Last Edited: 10/16/2012 6:57:38 PM by JSF
The Optimist
General User
Member Since: 3/16/2007
Location: CLE
Post Count: 5,611
mail
The Optimist
mail
Posted: 10/16/2012 7:20 PM
JSF wrote:expand_more
So you want us to organize a letter writing campaign to Gov. Kasich? I'm sure he'll give it the consideration it deserves.

Not exactly, but close enough.

Quote:expand_more
Booting Eastern Michigan is going to result in a significant increase in cash flow?


Yes.

Quote:expand_more
You're simply not operating from a realistic standpoint.

My name isn't The Realist.  At least I am realistic about myself being an optimist... The people pretending EMU will ever bring value to the MAC are delusional.  I can name 5 FCS programs who would bring significantly more value to the MAC than EMU does, although I can't guarantee they'd have any interest in joining.
AudioCat'13
General User
AC13
Member Since: 10/1/2007
Location: Nowheresville, OH
Post Count: 164
person
mail
AudioCat'13
mail
Posted: 10/16/2012 8:01 PM
10 years ago some MAC fans might of wanted to boot Ohio from the MAC, so lets keep some perspective. Also EMU is pretty solid in BBall and I think women's bball. Yes football is less to be desired, but they are a good football coach away from doing a decent job. I just feel that they need to get some direction.  
The Optimist
General User
Member Since: 3/16/2007
Location: CLE
Post Count: 5,611
mail
The Optimist
mail
Posted: 10/16/2012 8:18 PM
I see building a team and building a program as two very different things.  They require different things.  Anyone can build a team.  Not all schools have the necessary infrastructure to build a program.  I believe all of the MAC has the infrastructure to build a program, except EMU.  A competitive EMU football program just does not seem sustainable, to me.

I have nothing against EMU, I just don't see them doing anything with their location being where it is.  Unfortunately.  I think there are a number of FCS teams that would be MUCH better alternatives for the MAC than EMU.  If you disagree, that is fine.  The unwillingness of MAC fans to even consider the possibility that we'd be better off without EMU as the conferences around us are making moves proves to me that MAC fans are not interested in making the tough choices necessary to really change the game.

I do think EMU could do something in basketball.  If basketball really mattered (like I wish it did) Ohio University would've already received some phone calls.
Last Edited: 10/16/2012 8:23:37 PM by The Optimist
Recovering Journalist
General User
RJ
Member Since: 8/17/2010
Location: Cleveland, OH
Post Count: 1,864
person
mail
Recovering Journalist
mail
Posted: 10/16/2012 8:32 PM
The Optimist wrote:expand_more
You've been a complete and total jerk about the whole thing.

True.


Being an obnoxious loudmouth and making our fanbase look like a pack of delusional jackasses isn't really helpful.

I love our team and I'm thrilled with being 7-0, but why should anyone respect Ohio? If the shoe were on the other foot, we'd all think Ohio was overrated and very, very beatable.Three of the four worst teams in the MAC have come within one score of this team. The Beatles were topping the charts when Ohio last won a championship. It wasn't too long ago that the the biggest draw at the stadium literally was the marching band. Even in basketball, where Ohio has clearly enjoyed a lot more sustained success, the last regular season championship was 1994. Now the MAC is suddenly not good enough for its founding member? Sorry, but there's a lot of evidence to the contrary.

Yes, we're on an upswing right now and it's really exciting, but we really ought to show some humility and grace as fans even as we hope all goes right on the field.
The Optimist
General User
Member Since: 3/16/2007
Location: CLE
Post Count: 5,611
mail
The Optimist
mail
Posted: 10/16/2012 8:51 PM
Recovering Journalist wrote:expand_more
Now the MAC is suddenly not good enough for its founding member? Sorry, but there's a lot of evidence to the contrary.

I never made the argument the MAC is not good enough for Ohio.  To the contrary, I am trying to improve the conference we founded.  I believe Ohio is best off in the MAC, however I believe the MAC has the potential to improve greatly.

Quote:expand_more
Yes, we're on an upswing right now and it's really exciting, but we really ought to show some humility and grace as fans even as we hope all goes right on the field.

Agreed.  You will not find me bragging about our success anywhere.
Last Edited: 10/16/2012 8:52:25 PM by The Optimist
JSF
General User
Member Since: 1/29/2005
Location: Houston, TX
Post Count: 6,580
mail
JSF
mail
Posted: 10/17/2012 12:06 AM
But how does removing Eastern Michigan and nothing else do anything for the conference?
Showing Messages: 26 - 50 of 64
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)