menu
Logo
Ohio Football Topic
Topic: Minnesota available in '13 and '14
Page: 1 of 2
Pataskala
General User
P
Member Since: 7/8/2010
Location: At least six feet away from anybody else
Post Count: 9,465
person
mail
Pataskala
mail
Posted: 10/16/2012 3:47 PM
They've cancelled games with UNC in order to build up the program.
MariettaCatFanatic
General User
Member Since: 7/6/2010
Post Count: 417
mail
MariettaCatFanatic
mail
Posted: 10/16/2012 4:04 PM
I believe we are scheduled to play up there in '15, but I wouldn't be opposed to adding a home and home with them for these years as well. The question is...would they want to play us if they're trying to build up their program?
OhioCatFan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 15,700
mail
OhioCatFan
mail
Posted: 10/16/2012 5:10 PM
How about 1:1 with UNC.  First game in Athens in 2013.  ESPN game on a Friday in early September.  After we bust into BCS and win the bowl game, UNC will need the game to help their SOS.  
Ohio69
General User
O69
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 3,124
person
mail
Ohio69
mail
Posted: 10/16/2012 6:46 PM
Pataskala wrote:expand_more
They've cancelled games with UNC in order to build up the program.


Seems like a weird move.  Wonder if they'll cancel on us.  After all, we are better than UNC.


bigtillyoopsupsideurhead
General User
Member Since: 12/1/2006
Location: Cincinnati
Post Count: 1,926
mail
bigtillyoopsupsideurhead
mail
Posted: 10/16/2012 7:05 PM
As of right now our schedule for '13 and '14 is full: http://www.fbschedules.com/ncaa-14/mid-amer/2014-ohio-bobcats-football-schedule.php
The Optimist
General User
Member Since: 3/16/2007
Location: CLE
Post Count: 5,611
mail
The Optimist
mail
Posted: 10/16/2012 7:23 PM
bigtillyoopsupsideurhead wrote:expand_more


Realistically, we are going to win a lot of games.  Optimistically, we are going to win A LOT of games.
Pataskala
General User
P
Member Since: 7/8/2010
Location: At least six feet away from anybody else
Post Count: 9,465
person
mail
Pataskala
mail
Posted: 10/16/2012 7:53 PM
bigtillyoopsupsideurhead wrote:expand_more


Yes, but there's always room for change.  Maybe we could trade Austin Peay to Miinn for UNC.
ohio9704
General User
O9704
Member Since: 2/11/2006
Post Count: 1,591
person
mail
ohio9704
mail
Posted: 10/16/2012 8:16 PM
Drop the home game vs. Austin Peay in 2013 and play at Minnesota.  You still have 6 home games.  Buy out the Idaho series all together, because they might be FCS if they don't find a league affiliation and have Minnesota come to Athens in 2014.  
The Optimist
General User
Member Since: 3/16/2007
Location: CLE
Post Count: 5,611
mail
The Optimist
mail
Posted: 10/16/2012 8:26 PM
ohio9704 wrote:expand_more
Drop the home game vs. Austin Peay in 2013 and play at Minnesota.  You still have 6 home games.  Buy out the Idaho series all together, because they might be FCS if they don't find a league affiliation and have Minnesota come to Athens in 2014.  

If they end up in FCS, would the NCAA grandfather them in for the sake of our schedule and count 2 FCS opponents?
ohio9704
General User
O9704
Member Since: 2/11/2006
Post Count: 1,591
person
mail
ohio9704
mail
Posted: 10/16/2012 8:30 PM
The Optimist wrote:expand_more
Drop the home game vs. Austin Peay in 2013 and play at Minnesota.  You still have 6 home games.  Buy out the Idaho series all together, because they might be FCS if they don't find a league affiliation and have Minnesota come to Athens in 2014.  

If they end up in FCS, would the NCAA grandfather them in for the sake of our schedule and count 2 FCS opponents?


They are set to become an Independent, but I would rather drop that series and not make a trip to Moscow, Idaho
First Street Forever
General User
Member Since: 12/19/2010
Location: Chicago, IL
Post Count: 247
mail
First Street Forever
mail
Posted: 10/16/2012 10:00 PM
Maybe we can drop Marshall and replace with Minnesota???

(ducks from hurled roots, herbs and mushrooms)
GoCats105
General User
GC105
Member Since: 1/31/2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Post Count: 7,823
person
mail
GoCats105
mail
Posted: 10/17/2012 7:48 AM
The Optimist wrote:expand_more
Drop the home game vs. Austin Peay in 2013 and play at Minnesota.  You still have 6 home games.  Buy out the Idaho series all together, because they might be FCS if they don't find a league affiliation and have Minnesota come to Athens in 2014.  

If they end up in FCS, would the NCAA grandfather them in for the sake of our schedule and count 2 FCS opponents?


I don't think the NCAA takes into account when the deal was made that both teams were FBS. Rather, it matters when the game is played, and if Idaho is FCS by then we'll be SOL.
Chuck_IV
General User
CIV
Member Since: 1/20/2005
Location: CT
Post Count: 198
person
mail
Chuck_IV
mail
Posted: 10/17/2012 8:50 AM
Ya know, everyone is focusing on a game with Minn. I wouldn't mind seeing a game or two with North Carolina. I wonder of we could get them to come to Peden?
MariettaCatFanatic
General User
Member Since: 7/6/2010
Post Count: 417
mail
MariettaCatFanatic
mail
Posted: 10/17/2012 9:06 AM
Chuck_IV wrote:expand_more
Ya know, everyone is focusing on a game with Minn. I wouldn't mind seeing a game or two with North Carolina. I wonder of we could get them to come to Peden?


I bet we could...I'd be all for it.
The Optimist
General User
Member Since: 3/16/2007
Location: CLE
Post Count: 5,611
mail
The Optimist
mail
Posted: 10/17/2012 10:10 AM
Chuck_IV wrote:expand_more
Ya know, everyone is focusing on a game with Minn. I wouldn't mind seeing a game or two with North Carolina. I wonder of we could get them to come to Peden?

I am skeptical, but that would be amazing.
Ohio69
General User
O69
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 3,124
person
mail
Ohio69
mail
Posted: 10/17/2012 10:31 AM
Chuck_IV wrote:expand_more
Ya know, everyone is focusing on a game with Minn. I wouldn't mind seeing a game or two with North Carolina. I wonder of we could get them to come to Peden?


Minnesota is already on our schedule.  2015 I think.  Would be kind of funny to drop them for North Carolina.
drinkmoxie
General User
D
Member Since: 11/22/2011
Location: Cary, NC
Post Count: 43
person
mail
drinkmoxie
mail
Posted: 10/17/2012 11:08 AM
First Street Forever wrote:expand_more
Maybe we can drop Marshall and replace with Minnesota???

(ducks from hurled roots, herbs and mushrooms)


This has been a fun rivalry of late, why would we want to get rid of it. And with Cato being a sophomore, I think Marshall will continue to get better and will be a more impressive win each year. 
The Optimist
General User
Member Since: 3/16/2007
Location: CLE
Post Count: 5,611
mail
The Optimist
mail
Posted: 10/17/2012 11:29 AM
drinkmoxie wrote:expand_more
Maybe we can drop Marshall and replace with Minnesota???

(ducks from hurled roots, herbs and mushrooms)


This has been a fun rivalry of late, why would we want to get rid of it. And with Cato being a sophomore, I think Marshall will continue to get better and will be a more impressive win each year. 

As long as it is a win I will be happy.
Mike Johnson
General User
Member Since: 11/11/2004
Location: North Canton, OH
Post Count: 1,757
mail
Mike Johnson
mail
Posted: 10/17/2012 11:45 AM
In this board's history, has any topic fueled more discussion and debate than scheduling? 

I've joined in the discussion from time to time and will have another go at this morning. 

I like the upcoming schedules as they stand.  And I really like the upcoming 7-game home schedule.  Heck, I'd go for an 8-game home schedule even if it meant adding another non-BCS opponent.

What has become increasingly apparent is that quality of opponent has had little if any negative effect on Peden attendance.  To the contrary, some of the larger crowds have attended for games against FCS opponents or weaker FBS/MAC foes. 

Some might argue that more games against more marquee (no dictionary at my SCORE office so I might have blown that spelling) opponents would draw even larger crowds.  But attendance at games against opponents such as East Carolina and Minnesota don't inspire confidence in that possibility.  And as it seems unlikely that we will see a near- to mid-term expansion of Peden, we will continue maxing out crowds at between 25,000 and 26,000.

What also is becoming increasingly apparent: Attendance is fueled largely not by quality of opponent but by victorious seasons and higher expectations for continued success.  And to me at least, recent, current and upcoming scheduling has contributed to increased victories and expectations.

None of the above is profound, and I don't expect widespread agreement from fellow bobcatattackers.  I simply look at Coach Solich's 57-40 overall record, his 34-14 record for the last 3.5 seasons, larger Peden crowds and my own increased excitement on Ohio game days and find myself pleased with current and future scheduling.

Go Bobcats!!
Pataskala
General User
P
Member Since: 7/8/2010
Location: At least six feet away from anybody else
Post Count: 9,465
person
mail
Pataskala
mail
Posted: 10/17/2012 12:18 PM
Mike Johnson wrote:expand_more
In this board's history, has any topic fueled more discussion and debate than scheduling? 

I've joined in the discussion from time to time and will have another go at this morning. 

I like the upcoming schedules as they stand.  And I really like the upcoming 7-game home schedule.  Heck, I'd go for an 8-game home schedule even if it meant adding another non-BCS opponent.

What has become increasingly apparent is that quality of opponent has had little if any negative effect on Peden attendance.  To the contrary, some of the larger crowds have attended for games against FCS opponents or weaker FBS/MAC foes. 

Some might argue that more games against more marquee (no dictionary at my SCORE office so I might have blown that spelling) opponents would draw even larger crowds.  But attendance at games against opponents such as East Carolina and Minnesota don't inspire confidence in that possibility.  And as it seems unlikely that we will see a near- to mid-term expansion of Peden, we will continue maxing out crowds at between 25,000 and 26,000.

What also is becoming increasingly apparent: Attendance is fueled largely not by quality of opponent but by victorious seasons and higher expectations for continued success.  And to me at least, recent, current and upcoming scheduling has contributed to increased victories and expectations.

None of the above is profound, and I don't expect widespread agreement from fellow bobcatattackers.  I simply look at Coach Solich's 57-40 overall record, his 34-14 record for the last 3.5 seasons, larger Peden crowds and my own increased excitement on Ohio game days and find myself pleased with current and future scheduling.

Go Bobcats!!


I'm not concerned about the crowds so much as elevating the quality of our opponents.  The knock on our 7-0 record is that except for Penn St we haven't played a "quality" opponent, i.e., an AQ school or a perennially good non-AQ.  If we had played and beaten a Big Least or ACC school instead of NMSU or Norfolk St, we would've gotten more respect and be more in the BCS conversation.  Coach Solich revamped the schedule a few years ago to build the program.  There should come a time, though, when we recognize that the program is built and bring the schedule up a notch.  We don't have to go overboard like Fiami does, but trading adding an AQ school in place of a non-AQ or a 1AA would seem to be in order.
Mike Johnson
General User
Member Since: 11/11/2004
Location: North Canton, OH
Post Count: 1,757
mail
Mike Johnson
mail
Posted: 10/17/2012 6:08 PM
Pataskala wrote:expand_more
In this board's history, has any topic fueled more discussion and debate than scheduling? 

I've joined in the discussion from time to time and will have another go at this morning. 

I like the upcoming schedules as they stand.  And I really like the upcoming 7-game home schedule.  Heck, I'd go for an 8-game home schedule even if it meant adding another non-BCS opponent.

What has become increasingly apparent is that quality of opponent has had little if any negative effect on Peden attendance.  To the contrary, some of the larger crowds have attended for games against FCS opponents or weaker FBS/MAC foes. 

Some might argue that more games against more marquee (no dictionary at my SCORE office so I might have blown that spelling) opponents would draw even larger crowds.  But attendance at games against opponents such as East Carolina and Minnesota don't inspire confidence in that possibility.  And as it seems unlikely that we will see a near- to mid-term expansion of Peden, we will continue maxing out crowds at between 25,000 and 26,000.

What also is becoming increasingly apparent: Attendance is fueled largely not by quality of opponent but by victorious seasons and higher expectations for continued success.  And to me at least, recent, current and upcoming scheduling has contributed to increased victories and expectations.

None of the above is profound, and I don't expect widespread agreement from fellow bobcatattackers.  I simply look at Coach Solich's 57-40 overall record, his 34-14 record for the last 3.5 seasons, larger Peden crowds and my own increased excitement on Ohio game days and find myself pleased with current and future scheduling.

Go Bobcats!!


I'm not concerned about the crowds so much as elevating the quality of our opponents.  The knock on our 7-0 record is that except for Penn St we haven't played a "quality" opponent, i.e., an AQ school or a perennially good non-AQ.  If we had played and beaten a Big Least or ACC school instead of NMSU or Norfolk St, we would've gotten more respect and be more in the BCS conversation.  Coach Solich revamped the schedule a few years ago to build the program.  There should come a time, though, when we recognize that the program is built and bring the schedule up a notch.  We don't have to go overboard like Fiami does, but trading adding an AQ school in place of a non-AQ or a 1AA would seem to be in order.


I largely agree with you.  While I wouldn't want to see Ohio swap an already scheduled opponent, beyond those non-conf games already booked, I wouldn't mind seeing another AQ school or two move onto the schedule - IF as time passes Coach Solich remains in the saddle and continues strengthening the program. 

I strongly agree re Miami's scheduling. I think it possible if not highly probable that Miami's non-conf scheduling has significantly contributed to the program's slide.  Starting each season with multiple losses has likely removed some of the Redhawks' starch.
Last Edited: 10/17/2012 6:18:09 PM by Mike Johnson
ou79
General User
O79
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 671
person
mail
ou79
mail
Posted: 10/17/2012 7:39 PM
I agree with Pataskala, we should try to upgrade our schedule.  I also have no problem dumping the FCS/DI-AA teams in favor of a lesser BE/ACC/B10 or B/12 opponent.  Try for a 1-1.  I notice we have future games at Louisville (2013), Kentucky (2014) and Minnesota (2015).  I remember something about also obtaining 1-1 games with Kansas and Cincy thereafter.  Why not try to upgrade with say a Pitt, Syracuse, Northwestern, Indiana, Duke or whomever.  Our schedule the next 3 years as it currently stands is not what I would consider anything near a murderous schedule.  As a matter of fact, other than the aforementioned 3 away games and Marshall, the rest of the OOC schedule is pretty much a joke.
OhioCatFan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 15,700
mail
OhioCatFan
mail
Posted: 10/17/2012 7:57 PM
ou79 wrote:expand_more
I agree with Pataskala, we should try to upgrade our schedule.  I also have no problem dumping the FCS/DI-AA teams in favor of a lesser BE/ACC/B10 or B/12 opponent.  Try for a 1-1.  I notice we have future games at Louisville (2013), Kentucky (2014) and Minnesota (2015).  I remember something about also obtaining 1-1 games with Kansas and Cincy thereafter.  Why not try to upgrade with say a Pitt, Syracuse, Northwestern, Indiana, Duke or whomever.  Our schedule the next 3 years as it currently stands is not what I would consider anything near a murderous schedule.  As a matter of fact, other than the aforementioned 3 away games and Marshall, the rest of the OOC schedule is pretty much a joke.


+1  

However for Pitt, we'll have to wait until their AD is fired, or Frank retires.  I truly hope the former happens way before the latter.
ohio9704
General User
O9704
Member Since: 2/11/2006
Post Count: 1,591
person
mail
ohio9704
mail
Posted: 10/18/2012 4:01 PM
Northwestern is now also open for 2013 and 2014 due to Vandy dropping them.
Pete Chouteau
General User
Member Since: 11/17/2004
Location: You Can't See Me
Post Count: 1,696
mail
Pete Chouteau
mail
Posted: 10/18/2012 4:19 PM
I find it interesting that all this is happening at the same time that school up north is dropping MAC opponents in an effort to beef up its strength of schedule.
Showing Messages: 1 - 25 of 29
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)