.......we chucked it all over the sandlot against a bad run defense. Extremely disappointed in the offensive gameplan. I don't remember a run outside the tackles that wasn't successful other than an option play. Looked like Albin pushed the panic button as soon as we fell behind.
Miami was stuffing the run early. It wasn't until we mixed it up that the run game started working.
I definitely didn't get that feeling. Look back at the drive chart.
1st offensive play of the game, 8 yard rush. Followed by an incompletion and then a sack. Gave the ball right back and Miami marched down and scored again to make it 10-0. Drive 2 we did get stuffed and forced us into throwing situation on a 2nd down. Drive 3 started with a 9 yard rush, that set up a long pass, and eventually a TD featuring a mix of runs & passes. Drive 4 we dropped back five straight times PUNT. Drive 5 started with a short run then long run, then medium passes and another long run. Tried to give it away by dropping back 3 stright times but converted the 3rd & 10. TT scampered in for the TD. Drive 6 got stuffed on 1st down followed by 2 incompletions PUNT. Drive 7 was a garbage time play that went for 8 yards on the ground.
Of the runs in the first half five of them were for 2 yards or less. Five were also for 8 yards or more including three over 15. Not what I consider getting stuffed.
I love throwing the ball around but I'm a big believer you play to your strengths and then to the other team's weaknesses. It's my opinion our strength is running the ball and Miami's weakness is ground D. Seems like a no brainer on the gameplan. Commit to the run and it will pay dividends later in the game. If you're completely being stuffed I'm all for a change in game plan at some point (perhaps half time) but that simply wasn't the case in this game. I felt like Albin was trying to make up for the too conservative play calling in the 4th Quarter of the Akron game that he openly addmitted was poor.