Can I ask why we care about winning the division now that we're not undefeated and have no shot at a BCS bowl? What does it really matter? What's the motivation to win the MAC at this point? A nice, shiny new banner for Peden? It's completely meaningless. Winning the division only ties you into one of the same old lousy MAC bowls.
I couldn't disagree more. A conference championship means a lot more to me than a bowl game. Your mileage may vary, but I doubt I'm the only one who sees it that way.
Not to sound blase, but we've been to three straight bowl games now, so it's not like we haven't been there already. We haven't won the MAC since 1968 -- the year before I was a freshman. It would be a plateau we haven't reached in my 43 years of association with Ohio University. I'd to see it happen.
I get there's a level of pride there, and all coaches say the same thing, but what's the reward for winning the conference? I shirt that says you are champs? A statistic that says you won it? The current college football postseason provides no real reward for winning your conference for the non-AQ's. In every other D-1 sport Ohio competes in winning the conference qualifies you into some type of postseason tournament. In football it does not. It gets you to Detroit or Mobile, and a hat that says you are champs. That's it.
My point is that end result of a good season is a bowl game either way, and by not winning you actually may get a better bowl and better opponent. I'll also argue winning a bowl game is more significant in the current college football lanscape than winning the conference. How many times this year have we heard the media mention winning our first bowl last year? Much more significant than winning the MACC and losing the bowl game.