menu
Logo
person
Bobcat Attack Menu
Logo
person
Ohio Football Topic
Topic: Play calling
Page: 1 of 1
Gallia Cat
General User
GC
Member Since: 7/11/2010
Post Count: 938
person
mail
Gallia Cat
mail
Posted: 11/7/2012 8:49 PM
settings_applications edit_note
Its already driving me a little crazy.  So predictable.  I wonder if we have a play up OUr sleeves with Vick lining up in the wide out position?  I hope so.
bobcat28
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 817
mail
bobcat28
mail
Posted: 11/7/2012 9:03 PM
settings_applications edit_note
Those qb draw calls on the second drive after we were up 7-0 totally changed the momentum of the game.
BleedinBobcat
General User
Member Since: 10/27/2012
Post Count: 73
mail
BleedinBobcat
mail
Posted: 11/7/2012 9:19 PM
settings_applications edit_note
Yep, that, and our horrendous punting game, lack of focus and mental errors, poor tackling, and BG being the physically and mentally tough superior team.
PA Bobcat Fan
General User
PBF
Member Since: 9/20/2005
Post Count: 78
person
mail
PA Bobcat Fan
mail
Posted: 11/7/2012 9:21 PM
settings_applications edit_note
We go one series with the hurry up, score, then abandon it. This sucks.
SBH
General User
SBH
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 4,679
person
mail
SBH
mail
Posted: 11/7/2012 9:23 PM
settings_applications edit_note
Astonishing inability by Tim Albin to make adjustments to defensive pressure.

Casper71
General User
C71
Member Since: 12/1/2006
Post Count: 3,237
person
mail
Casper71
mail
Posted: 11/7/2012 11:20 PM
settings_applications edit_note
Run inside on first and second and throw the bubble screen or flat pass.  I'm thinking we can't go down the field because of lack of deep threat (with the injuries to WR?).  Bottom line is we gave away a lot of points and...BG dominated the line of scrimmage all night.  To me It's still the talent level.  We are getting the same kind of players as BG and Miami.  I thought we would be ahead of everyone by now but we are kidding ourselves if we think our talent level is superior.

Just a disappointing end to the season losing to in state rivals.
C Money
General User
Member Since: 8/28/2010
Post Count: 3,420
mail
C Money
mail
Posted: 11/7/2012 11:27 PM
settings_applications edit_note
Casper71 wrote:expand_more
To me It's still the talent level.  We are getting the same kind of players as BG and Miami.  I thought we would be ahead of everyone by now but we are kidding ourselves if we think our talent level is superior.


There are others on this board WAAAAY more knowledgeable about our recruiting than I am, so if they disagree I'll defer to them, but my general observation is that on defense we have recruited more at the outside positions up front (OLB and DE) than inside. We're getting absolutely pushed around by teams running the ball against us, and I wonder if the reason is we don't have the beef in the middle.
OUBobcat13
General User
OUB13
Member Since: 12/8/2005
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Post Count: 285
person
mail
OUBobcat13
mail
Posted: 11/7/2012 11:33 PM
settings_applications edit_note
I can't really blame the defense tonight. Yes, they had their low points, but we held them to 26 points, with 19 being off punting issues. When the other team's offense gets the ball on our 20 yard line, I don't really expect our Defense to be able to stop them every time.

On the other hand, despite our Special Team's Jr. High performance, I agree with others that our offense was just not there. Why did we not use Beau more? Any is it just me, or is Tyler regressing in some of his decision making? When Vick came in, I actually thought he was going to stay in for the drive because he may be a bit of a better runner than Tyler. I don't know what the issues are, but I'm sure glad I have basketball to look forward to on Saturday.
LoganElm_grad09
General User
LE09
Member Since: 9/9/2010
Location: South Bloomingville, OH
Post Count: 934
person
mail
LoganElm_grad09
mail
Posted: 11/8/2012 1:32 AM
settings_applications edit_note
Defense played great for what they could have given up.  19 points were from the 35 going in.  Add 8 points had they given up touchdowns and we lose 34-14.  If Grant doesn't take a saftey, 41-14.

The only time they scored outside that was on a trick play that fooled EVERYBODY.  We didn't let them get long drives for scores.  Even with our offensive play calling, we may have won 14-7 tonight.

Something needs to be done with the punt team.  We're allowing too many guys to get through.  It looked like they overloaded one side and we never adjusted to it.  It was a night where if it could go wrong, it did.
BillyTheCat
General User
BTC
Member Since: 10/6/2012
Post Count: 10,803
person
mail
BillyTheCat
mail
Posted: 11/8/2012 2:21 AM
settings_applications edit_note
LoganElm_grad09 wrote:expand_more
If Grant doesn't take a saftey, 41-14.
Didn't Weller take that safety? Maybe wrong, but he hasn't punted as a Bobcat? (maybe wrong on that one, but I sure can't remember one). That's a pretty tough assignment if my aging memory is servicing me correctly.
LoganElm_grad09
General User
LE09
Member Since: 9/9/2010
Location: South Bloomingville, OH
Post Count: 934
person
mail
LoganElm_grad09
mail
Posted: 11/8/2012 2:23 AM
settings_applications edit_note
It may have been; I was on the other side of the stadium so I didn't get clear looks at everything.
Bcat2
General User
B2
Member Since: 7/6/2010
Post Count: 4,295
person
mail
Bcat2
mail
Posted: 11/8/2012 7:24 AM
settings_applications edit_note
Casper71 wrote:expand_more
Run inside on first and second and throw the bubble screen or flat pass.  I'm thinking we can't go down the field because of lack of deep threat (with the injuries to WR?).  Bottom line is we gave away a lot of points and...BG dominated the line of scrimmage all night.  To me It's still the talent level.  We are getting the same kind of players as BG and Miami.  I thought we would be ahead of everyone by now but we are kidding ourselves if we think our talent level is superior.

Just a disappointing end to the season losing to in state rivals.


T. Scott, T. Carrie, J. Thompson, X. Hughes, J. Shaw, M. Dovell, L. Smith, ...  Minus these folks, BGSU did appear to outathlete the cats.  Oh, the MAC's talent level is not inferior.  This week the MAC was rated above the B1G.  This is not our uncle's MAC .
Last Edited: 11/8/2012 8:01:57 AM by Bcat2
Doc Bobcat
General User
DB
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 4,421
person
mail
Doc Bobcat
mail
Posted: 11/8/2012 7:50 AM
settings_applications edit_note
Bcat2 wrote:expand_more
Run inside on first and second and throw the bubble screen or flat pass.  I'm thinking we can't go down the field because of lack of deep threat (with the injuries to WR?).  Bottom line is we gave away a lot of points and...BG dominated the line of scrimmage all night.  To me It's still the talent level.  We are getting the same kind of players as BG and Miami.  I thought we would be ahead of everyone by now but we are kidding ourselves if we think our talent level is superior.

Just a disappointing end to the season losing to in state rivals.


T. Scott, T. Carrie, J. Thompson, X. Hughes, J. Shaw, M. Dovell, L. Smith, ... 


I've never thought OUr talent was that superior....but you remove the guys mentioned above and a ton playin hurt and it becomes inferior.....albeit OUr depth is WAY better than the Knorr years.
Casper71
General User
C71
Member Since: 12/1/2006
Post Count: 3,237
person
mail
Casper71
mail
Posted: 11/8/2012 9:30 AM
settings_applications edit_note
I understand the injuries but we really got beat in the trenches last night.  If you go back and look at STARTERS ONLY, most of the linemen (and all the players) have started every game.  The key may be we don't have the rotation (especially) of linemen we had earlier in the year.  The result after three games in 12 days is they looked really worn down and slow.

I have to agree with one other poster, I think this team looks uninspired right now. 
Showing Messages: 1 - 14 of 14
reply
vertical_align_top
vertical_align_center
vertical_align_bottom
add_comment
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)