menu
Logo
Ohio Football Topic
Topic: The MAC in a nutshell
Page: 1 of 1
Pataskala
General User
P
Member Since: 7/8/2010
Location: At least six feet away from anybody else
Post Count: 9,465
person
mail
Pataskala
mail
Posted: 11/30/2012 7:02 AM
Love this excerpt from Dan Wetzel's piece on getting a MAC team into a BCS game:

It would be a magical moment for the MAC, a proud day for a league full of mostly Midwestern state schools with often working and middle class students looking for a leg up. The MAC never puts on airs. There are no delusions of grandeur. It keeps its athletic departments in line with its universities. The league just is what it is.

"We're just a bunch of kids who love to play no matter who shows up to watch or who's talking about us," NIU quarterback Jordan Lynch said.


Sort of says it all about the MAC.
OUcats82
General User
Member Since: 1/9/2005
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Post Count: 1,912
mail
OUcats82
mail
Posted: 11/30/2012 8:23 AM
Pataskala wrote:expand_more
Love this excerpt from Dan Wetzel's piece on getting a MAC team into a BCS game:

It would be a magical moment for the MAC, a proud day for a league full of mostly Midwestern state schools with often working and middle class students looking for a leg up. The MAC never puts on airs. There are no delusions of grandeur. It keeps its athletic departments in line with its universities. The league just is what it is.

"We're just a bunch of kids who love to play no matter who shows up to watch or who's talking about us," NIU quarterback Jordan Lynch said.


Sort of says it all about the MAC.


This describes my family very well.  My sisters and I all went to MAC schools and were the first in our family's lineage (that we know of) to earn a degree. 
Mark Lembright '85
General User
ML85
Member Since: 8/22/2010
Location: Highland Heights, OH
Post Count: 2,460
person
mail
Mark Lembright '85
mail
Posted: 11/30/2012 9:03 AM
That's a well written article and I agree as far as the MAC's concerned.  I think the MAC is perfect for Ohio and vice versa.
Bobcatbob
General User
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Coolville, OH
Post Count: 1,351
mail
Bobcatbob
mail
Posted: 11/30/2012 9:04 AM
We're the "Rust Belt" conference and proud of it.  Nice description by Wetzel.  Think of the branch campuses alone.  Nothing screams midwest working class more than Zanesville, Belmont County, Portsmouth and Lancaster (not to mention Chillicothe).
Ohio69
General User
O69
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 3,124
person
mail
Ohio69
mail
Posted: 11/30/2012 9:20 AM
Kent almost making a BCS bowl makes me wonder why any school would spend $50-$60 million on athletics annually.
Mark Lembright '85
General User
ML85
Member Since: 8/22/2010
Location: Highland Heights, OH
Post Count: 2,460
person
mail
Mark Lembright '85
mail
Posted: 11/30/2012 9:25 AM
Ohio69 wrote:expand_more
Kent almost making a BCS bowl makes me wonder why any school would spend $50-$60 million on athletics annually.


I thought I read somewhere that OSU spends upwards of $130 million a year on their athletic dept.  I could be wrong on that.

I do think it shows as we all know that Ohio does have its priorities in order.
sargentfan
General User
S
Member Since: 3/17/2005
Post Count: 917
person
mail
sargentfan
mail
Posted: 11/30/2012 1:06 PM
Mark Lembright '85 wrote:expand_more
Kent almost making a BCS bowl makes me wonder why any school would spend $50-$60 million on athletics annually.


I thought I read somewhere that OSU spends upwards of $130 million a year on their athletic dept.  I could be wrong on that.

I do think it shows as we all know that Ohio does have its priorities in order.


That is a stupid statement, OSU is one of only two schools to offer all 36 NCAA sports at their institution and no student fees in any way are used to pay for their athletic dept.  The athletic dept. is actually expected to give a certain amount of money to the university each year to help the university make its budget.  And on top of that OSU last I checked was a higher ranked institution than OHIO, so it does seem to have its academic priorities in order, you would have been better off using an SEC school as an example of bad priorities.
Mark Lembright '85
General User
ML85
Member Since: 8/22/2010
Location: Highland Heights, OH
Post Count: 2,460
person
mail
Mark Lembright '85
mail
Posted: 11/30/2012 1:36 PM
sargentfan wrote:expand_more
Kent almost making a BCS bowl makes me wonder why any school would spend $50-$60 million on athletics annually.


I thought I read somewhere that OSU spends upwards of $130 million a year on their athletic dept.  I could be wrong on that.

I do think it shows as we all know that Ohio does have its priorities in order.


That is a stupid statement, OSU is one of only two schools to offer all 36 NCAA sports at their institution and no student fees in any way are used to pay for their athletic dept.  The athletic dept. is actually expected to give a certain amount of money to the university each year to help the university make its budget.  And on top of that OSU last I checked was a higher ranked institution than OHIO, so it does seem to have its academic priorities in order, you would have been better off using an SEC school as an example of bad priorities.


A little harsh, aren't we?  OK, replace the letters "OSU" with "Auburn".  Feel better now?  Geez, where's the civility of this board gone?  Have a Snickers bar Sargentfan, you'll feel better!
sargentfan
General User
S
Member Since: 3/17/2005
Post Count: 917
person
mail
sargentfan
mail
Posted: 11/30/2012 4:27 PM
Mark Lembright '85 wrote:expand_more
Kent almost making a BCS bowl makes me wonder why any school would spend $50-$60 million on athletics annually.


I thought I read somewhere that OSU spends upwards of $130 million a year on their athletic dept.  I could be wrong on that.

I do think it shows as we all know that Ohio does have its priorities in order.


That is a stupid statement, OSU is one of only two schools to offer all 36 NCAA sports at their institution and no student fees in any way are used to pay for their athletic dept.  The athletic dept. is actually expected to give a certain amount of money to the university each year to help the university make its budget.  And on top of that OSU last I checked was a higher ranked institution than OHIO, so it does seem to have its academic priorities in order, you would have been better off using an SEC school as an example of bad priorities.


A little harsh, aren't we?  OK, replace the letters "OSU" with "Auburn".  Feel better now?  Geez, where's the civility of this board gone?  Have a Snickers bar Sargentfan, you'll feel better!


I might be an ardent OHIO fan, but I am also secondarily a OSU fan.  I don't mind much of the OSU hate here cause I understand the reasons.  But I will stick up for OSU when anyone writes something way off base about them.  Thus why you got such a reaction and if you think that was a lack of civility you must live in a bubble, that was tame for what you would get on most other message boards.
Pataskala
General User
P
Member Since: 7/8/2010
Location: At least six feet away from anybody else
Post Count: 9,465
person
mail
Pataskala
mail
Posted: 11/30/2012 7:43 PM
Isn't it amazing how a thread about a really good, heartwarming article about the MAC turned into a friggin' barroom brawl.
west side cat
General User
WSC
Member Since: 11/7/2012
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Post Count: 130
person
mail
west side cat
mail
Posted: 11/30/2012 10:40 PM
I quite like the MAC.   It is what it is.....modest budgets, kids playing mostly for the love of the game, enjoyable fans who mostly keep a proper perspective.   Great prices on season tickets to see up close division 1 athletics.   And the occasional BCS buster or Sweet 16 run that  fans appreciate and enjoy that create lasting memories.   God I'm getting old.
whocaresgobobcats
General User
W
Member Since: 8/29/2011
Post Count: 519
person
mail
whocaresgobobcats
mail
Posted: 11/30/2012 10:43 PM
sargentfan wrote:expand_more
Kent almost making a BCS bowl makes me wonder why any school would spend $50-$60 million on athletics annually.


I thought I read somewhere that OSU spends upwards of $130 million a year on their athletic dept.  I could be wrong on that.

I do think it shows as we all know that Ohio does have its priorities in order.


That is a stupid statement, OSU is one of only two schools to offer all 36 NCAA sports at their institution and no student fees in any way are used to pay for their athletic dept.  The athletic dept. is actually expected to give a certain amount of money to the university each year to help the university make its budget.  And on top of that OSU last I checked was a higher ranked institution than OHIO, so it does seem to have its academic priorities in order, you would have been better off using an SEC school as an example of bad priorities.


A little harsh, aren't we?  OK, replace the letters "OSU" with "Auburn".  Feel better now?  Geez, where's the civility of this board gone?  Have a Snickers bar Sargentfan, you'll feel better!


I might be an ardent OHIO fan, but I am also secondarily a OSU fan.  I don't mind much of the OSU hate here cause I understand the reasons.  But I will stick up for OSU when anyone writes something way off base about them.  Thus why you got such a reaction and if you think that was a lack of civility you must live in a bubble, that was tame for what you would get on most other message boards.



OSU sucks
D.A.
General User
DA
Member Since: 8/6/2010
Location: Georgetown, ME
Post Count: 1,198
person
mail
D.A.
mail
Posted: 11/30/2012 11:09 PM
BlockedPunt wrote:expand_more
Kent almost making a BCS bowl makes me wonder why any school would spend $50-$60 million on athletics annually.


I thought I read somewhere that OSU spends upwards of $130 million a year on their athletic dept.  I could be wrong on that.

I do think it shows as we all know that Ohio does have its priorities in order.


That is a stupid statement, OSU is one of only two schools to offer all 36 NCAA sports at their institution and no student fees in any way are used to pay for their athletic dept.  The athletic dept. is actually expected to give a certain amount of money to the university each year to help the university make its budget.  And on top of that OSU last I checked was a higher ranked institution than OHIO, so it does seem to have its academic priorities in order, you would have been better off using an SEC school as an example of bad priorities.


A little harsh, aren't we?  OK, replace the letters "OSU" with "Auburn".  Feel better now?  Geez, where's the civility of this board gone?  Have a Snickers bar Sargentfan, you'll feel better!


I might be an ardent OHIO fan, but I am also secondarily a OSU fan.  I don't mind much of the OSU hate here cause I understand the reasons.  But I will stick up for OSU when anyone writes something way off base about them.  Thus why you got such a reaction and if you think that was a lack of civility you must live in a bubble, that was tame for what you would get on most other message boards.



OSU sucks

+1
Jeff McKinney
Moderator
JM
Member Since: 11/12/2004
Post Count: 6,163
person
mail
Jeff McKinney
mail
Posted: 12/1/2012 10:48 PM
These potshots at the academics of SEC schools is getting old.  The midwestern schools, like the Big Ten, haven't exactly avoided being penalized recently.  And several SEC schools have a very solid research school academic rating.   
OhioCatFan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 15,700
mail
OhioCatFan
mail
Posted: 12/1/2012 11:12 PM
Jeff McKinney wrote:expand_more
These potshots at the academics of SEC schools is getting old.  The midwestern schools, like the Big Ten, haven't exactly avoided being penalized recently.  And several SEC schools have a very solid research school academic rating.   


My cousin who works in the library at Alabama is very sensitive to these kind of remarks.  She's a girl from Minnesota but has become a big Crimson Tide fan, as has her husband who is on science faculty.  I wouldn't be surprised if there wasn't more cheating on a regular basis up Rt. 33 in Cowtown than in Tuscaloosa. 
Robert Fox
General User
RF
Member Since: 11/17/2004
Location: Knoxville, TN
Post Count: 2,039
person
mail
Robert Fox
mail
Posted: 12/2/2012 9:21 AM
Totally unfounded statement. There's no reason to point out an unnecessary attack against the SEC and then follow with the same BS about the big ten, and OSU in particular.

I'm not a fan of OSU. I just don't care about them. But this board gets so over-the-top with OSU hatred, it actually makes me want to defend them.
The Optimist
General User
Member Since: 3/16/2007
Location: CLE
Post Count: 5,611
mail
The Optimist
mail
Posted: 12/2/2012 9:28 AM
D.A. wrote:expand_more
Kent almost making a BCS bowl makes me wonder why any school would spend $50-$60 million on athletics annually.


I thought I read somewhere that OSU spends upwards of $130 million a year on their athletic dept.  I could be wrong on that.

I do think it shows as we all know that Ohio does have its priorities in order.


That is a stupid statement, OSU is one of only two schools to offer all 36 NCAA sports at their institution and no student fees in any way are used to pay for their athletic dept.  The athletic dept. is actually expected to give a certain amount of money to the university each year to help the university make its budget.  And on top of that OSU last I checked was a higher ranked institution than OHIO, so it does seem to have its academic priorities in order, you would have been better off using an SEC school as an example of bad priorities.


A little harsh, aren't we?  OK, replace the letters "OSU" with "Auburn".  Feel better now?  Geez, where's the civility of this board gone?  Have a Snickers bar Sargentfan, you'll feel better!


I might be an ardent OHIO fan, but I am also secondarily a OSU fan.  I don't mind much of the OSU hate here cause I understand the reasons.  But I will stick up for OSU when anyone writes something way off base about them.  Thus why you got such a reaction and if you think that was a lack of civility you must live in a bubble, that was tame for what you would get on most other message boards.



OSU sucks

+1

+1
BillyTheCat
General User
BTC
Member Since: 10/6/2012
Post Count: 10,803
person
mail
BillyTheCat
mail
Posted: 12/2/2012 9:31 AM
OhioCatFan wrote:expand_more
These potshots at the academics of SEC schools is getting old. The midwestern schools, like the Big Ten, haven't exactly avoided being penalized recently. And several SEC schools have a very solid research school academic rating.


My cousin who works in the library at Alabama is very sensitive to these kind of remarks. She's a girl from Minnesota but has become a big Crimson Tide fan, as has her husband who is on science faculty. I wouldn't be surprised if there wasn't more cheating on a regular basis up Rt. 33 in Cowtown than in Tuscaloosa.
You are a joke! Just make unfounded statements! Not to mention Marshall is one of the schools you quasi-support, like they are so squeaky clean.
Mark Lembright '85
General User
ML85
Member Since: 8/22/2010
Location: Highland Heights, OH
Post Count: 2,460
person
mail
Mark Lembright '85
mail
Posted: 12/2/2012 10:39 AM
It's funny where a thread goes sometimes.  My intent wasn't to denigrate or impugn any school; I only intended to point out the growing size of athletic budgets at some universities compared to Ohio's and I guess I poorly worded what I was intending or hoping to get across.  I think OSU's a great university and the SEC has many good universities in it; does it get much better than Vanderbilt?  (Although, if you think Auburn handled the Cam Newton situation on the up-and-up I've got some beachfront property in Montana I'd like to sell you).

Anyway, my point was, I like where Ohio's athletic department is right now and I like what Schaus is doing.
Showing Messages: 1 - 19 of 19
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)