menu
Logo
Ohio Football Topic
Topic: 2012 Bowl Projections
Page: 1 of 6
MariettaCatFanatic
General User
Member Since: 7/6/2010
Post Count: 417
mail
MariettaCatFanatic
mail
Posted: 9/5/2012 1:24 PM
I figured we could get this started and follow it week to week as the season goes on.

After Week 13:

Yahoo says Liberty Bowl vs. Tulsa

http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/ncaaf-dr-saturday/dr-saturday-bowl-projections-final-countdown-175302822--ncaaf.html;_ylt=Aq.kNs.0E8mIyJ0lyVOuhTBUYsp_;_ylu=X3oDMTE4NWRia245BG1pdANCbG9ncyBJbmRleARwb3MDMQRzZWMDTWVkaWFCbG9nSW5kZXg-;_ylg=X3oDMTFpMm9iMzh1BGludGwDdXMEbGFuZwNlbi11cwRwc3RhaWQDBHBzdGNhdANibG9nBHB0A3NlY3Rpb25z;_ylv=3


ESPN: Brad Edwards says no bowl/Mark Schlabach says Military Bowl vs. San Jose State

http://espn.go.com/college-football/bowls/projections


Athlon says Military Bowl vs. San Jose State

http://www.athlonsports.com/college-football/college-football-post-week-13-bowl-projections


Phil Steele says Military Bowl vs. San Jose State

http://www.philsteele.com/bowls/12-13/bowlprojections.html


USAToday.com says Military vs. Western Kentucky

http://usatoday.com/story/sports/ncaaf/2012/10/03/bowl-projections-bcs-title-game/1609731/


After Week 14:


College Sports Madness says Potato Bowl vs. Utah State

http://www.collegesportsmadness.com/football/bowl-projections


CBS says Military Bowl vs. San Jose State

http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball/bowls/predictions


Orlando Sentinel says Military Bowl vs. San Jose State

http://www.orlandosentinel.com/sports/blogs/college-gridiron-365/os-bowl-projections-who-is-coming-to-orlando-20121201,0,3243411.post


Scout says Military Bowl vs. San Jose State

http://cfn.scout.com/2/557866.html


SB Nation says Military Bowl vs. San Jose State

http://www.sbnation.com/bowl-games-2012-2013/2012/11/25/3687856/bowl-projections-2012-national-championship


SI.com says Military Bowl vs. San Jose State

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2012/writers/stewart_mandel/12/02/bowl-projections/index.html?sct=hp_t12_a6&eref=sihp
Last Edited: 12/2/2012 11:02:04 AM by MariettaCatFanatic
D.A.
General User
DA
Member Since: 8/6/2010
Location: Georgetown, ME
Post Count: 1,198
person
mail
D.A.
mail
Posted: 9/5/2012 1:55 PM
These are going to be fun as the season progresses, especially with the rampant speculation that we may run the table and would potentially qualify for a BCS bowl birth.
  • As I understand it, Pizza desperately wants Western and Toledo as their first choice because they travel better than we do, considering their fan base's relative proximity Detroit, and have first choice.
  • GoDaddy may well end up with the better match up for us between Pizza and GoDaddy in the MAC's tie in bowls.
  • FIPB was the best financial end result of any of our bowls to date.
  • And if we do, in our fantasy projection, end up undefeated and in a BCS bowl, we are likely to lose millions making the trip, as UConn did when they went to the Fiesta Bowl.
Let the speculation begin!!!

The Optimist
General User
Member Since: 3/16/2007
Location: CLE
Post Count: 5,611
mail
The Optimist
mail
Posted: 9/5/2012 2:06 PM
How do payouts work on bcs games? I'm assuming we'd have to buy a set of seats?
D.A.
General User
DA
Member Since: 8/6/2010
Location: Georgetown, ME
Post Count: 1,198
person
mail
D.A.
mail
Posted: 9/5/2012 2:08 PM
The Optimist wrote:expand_more
How do payouts work on bcs games? I'm assuming we'd have to buy a set of seats?


Yes, and that, plus the extended time the team and entourage is expected to arrive before the game were the primary source of their losses.  Considering our traveling entourage is considerable smaller than UConn's, you would think the financial outcome would be far worse in our case.

Not to be Debbie Downer.
C Money
General User
Member Since: 8/28/2010
Post Count: 3,420
mail
C Money
mail
Posted: 9/5/2012 2:31 PM
Eh, there's worse ways to lose a few million dollars.

Notre Dame in the Pizza Bowl would be epic...It'll never happen because Notre Dame would rather stay home than play in the Pizza Bowl, but it would be epic.
GoCats105
General User
GC105
Member Since: 1/31/2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Post Count: 7,825
person
mail
GoCats105
mail
Posted: 9/5/2012 4:36 PM
FWIW...

http://aol.sportingnews.com/ncaa-football/story/2011-01-24/sbj-bcs-payouts-grow-along-with-big-shares-for-big-six-conferences

Say we make the Orange Bowl, which payed out $17.5 million to WVU and Clemson each last year. If we sold our ticket allotment and traveled well and received the full $17.5 million we would theoretically earn more money for the MAC than the past 5-6 years combined! (Give or take a million or two, I don't have the past figures other than 2011).

And people wonder why football needs to be big at this school? That's an absolutely huge figure.
sargentfan
General User
S
Member Since: 3/17/2005
Post Count: 917
person
mail
sargentfan
mail
Posted: 9/5/2012 5:13 PM
GoCats105 wrote:expand_more
FWIW...

http://aol.sportingnews.com/ncaa-football/story/2011-01-24/sbj-bcs-payouts-grow-along-with-big-shares-for-big-six-conferences

Say we make the Orange Bowl, which payed out $17.5 million to WVU and Clemson each last year. If we sold our ticket allotment and traveled well and received the full $17.5 million we would theoretically earn more money for the MAC than the past 5-6 years combined! (Give or take a million or two, I don't have the past figures other than 2011).

And people wonder why football needs to be big at this school? That's an absolutely huge figure.


The thing with that $17.5 million dollar figure is that it first goes to your conference and then your conference spreads out the money.  The question would be how much of the pie does the MAC give the team that made it.  UConn got screwed because the Big East really spreads that money out equally, which is nice for those that don't make it or for the teams that have good traveling fans but sucks for those that don't travel well.  I would personally hope that if any MAC team is lucky enough to attend a BCS bowl game that the MAC would make sure that school would get enough of the pie to cover their expenses and ticket obligations.  Otherwise the academic faculties of the MAC schools might rebel.
roar-room
General User
R
Member Since: 12/23/2010
Location: Cleveland, OH
Post Count: 191
person
mail
roar-room
mail
Posted: 9/5/2012 5:34 PM
sargentfan wrote:expand_more
  Otherwise the academic faculties of the MAC schools might rebel.



Ohhh noooooooo!
MonroeClassmate
General User
MC
Member Since: 8/31/2010
Post Count: 2,325
person
mail
MonroeClassmate
mail
Posted: 9/5/2012 5:34 PM
Quote:expand_more
The thing with that $17.5 million dollar figure is that it first goes to your conference and then your conference spreads out the money.  The question would be how much of the pie does the MAC give the team that made it.  UConn got screwed because the Big East really spreads that money out equally, which is nice for those that don't make it or for the teams that have good traveling fans but sucks for those that don't travel well.  I would personally hope that if any MAC team is lucky enough to attend a BCS bowl game that the MAC would make sure that school would get enough of the pie to cover their expenses and ticket obligations.  Otherwise the academic faculties of the MAC schools might rebel.


Anything less than a split after expenses is not acceptable.  I thought the O$U's of the world had lavish trips with all kinds of goodies  received by all travelers and that cost was absorbed then the conference divided the lots.

All I have to say about talk this early in the season about things like this are:

Remember Ohio plays the day after Thanksgiving again this year and well that's all I got to say about it.
L.C.
General User
LC
Member Since: 9/1/2005
Post Count: 10,584
person
mail
L.C.
mail
Posted: 9/5/2012 5:41 PM
Exactly. If Ohio were to make a major bowl, the money would go to the MAC, and all the other MAC schools would get extra money. Would Ohio even get enough to cover costs, or would they end up with a loss? I don't know.

D.A. wrote:expand_more
Yes, and that, plus the extended time the team and entourage is expected to arrive before the game were the primary source of their losses.  Considering our traveling entourage is considerable smaller than UConn's, you would think the financial outcome would be far worse in our case....

How does that work? I would think with a smaller traveling group, you'd have lower expenses, and lose less.
The Optimist
General User
Member Since: 3/16/2007
Location: CLE
Post Count: 5,611
mail
The Optimist
mail
Posted: 9/5/2012 5:48 PM
I read that BCS conferences are notorious for spreading the money causing loses, but Boise got all the travel expenses covered by the WAC.  For some reason I don't expect much from the MAC.  
MariettaCatFanatic
General User
Member Since: 7/6/2010
Post Count: 417
mail
MariettaCatFanatic
mail
Posted: 9/5/2012 6:16 PM
I love how we're all talking about how much money we're going to get from the BCS game we're going to. Times have changed.
MariettaCatFanatic
General User
Member Since: 7/6/2010
Post Count: 417
mail
MariettaCatFanatic
mail
Posted: 9/5/2012 6:28 PM
I'll add another: Scout.com says GoDaddy vs. Troy.

http://cfn.scout.com/2/557866.html
GoCats105
General User
GC105
Member Since: 1/31/2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Post Count: 7,825
person
mail
GoCats105
mail
Posted: 9/5/2012 6:49 PM
Of course the money goes back to the conferences, everyone and their brother knows that. I would hopefully think that our AD asks the MAC for them to at least cover our expenses and then split up the rest. Either way, we're getting more money out of it. Unless we plan on moving out of the MAC soon, why not spread it around for the better of the league?
D.A.
General User
DA
Member Since: 8/6/2010
Location: Georgetown, ME
Post Count: 1,198
person
mail
D.A.
mail
Posted: 9/5/2012 7:49 PM
L.C. wrote:expand_more
Exactly. If Ohio were to make a major bowl, the money would go to the MAC, and all the other MAC schools would get extra money. Would Ohio even get enough to cover costs, or would they end up with a loss? I don't know.

Yes, and that, plus the extended time the team and entourage is expected to arrive before the game were the primary source of their losses.  Considering our traveling entourage is considerable smaller than UConn's, you would think the financial outcome would be far worse in our case....

How does that work? I would think with a smaller traveling group, you'd have lower expenses, and lose less.


We were in Boise for four days, and we would have to be at a BCS destination for a week.  We took only seniors in the band but would likely have to take the full band, etc.  Plus, UConn had thousands more than we would have traveling to a BCS game, which means we would have more unsold tickets than they did.
L.C.
General User
LC
Member Since: 9/1/2005
Post Count: 10,584
person
mail
L.C.
mail
Posted: 9/5/2012 8:40 PM
Oh, got you. When you said a smaller entourage than U. Conn., I thought you were referring to a smaller staff, not a smaller fan base. That was why I was confused, because a smaller staff would reduce expenses. Obviously a smaller fan base would mean more unsold tickets, and a bigger loss.
Last Edited: 9/5/2012 8:40:32 PM by L.C.
The Optimist
General User
Member Since: 3/16/2007
Location: CLE
Post Count: 5,611
mail
The Optimist
mail
Posted: 9/6/2012 7:54 AM
GoCats105 wrote:expand_more
Of course the money goes back to the conferences, everyone and their brother knows that. I would hopefully think that our AD asks the MAC for them to at least cover our expenses and then split up the rest. Either way, we're getting more money out of it. Unless we plan on moving out of the MAC soon, why not spread it around for the better of the league?

I do not support socialism.  
Bobcat Mac
General User
BM
Member Since: 2/4/2012
Location: Centerville, OH
Post Count: 140
person
mail
Bobcat Mac
mail
Posted: 9/6/2012 9:01 AM

In the fall of 94' campus talk was beating Kent State to stop the longest losing streak
in the nation! And yes school administration complained then also, when the university
had to pay to replace the South endzone goal post!!

GoCats105
General User
GC105
Member Since: 1/31/2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Post Count: 7,825
person
mail
GoCats105
mail
Posted: 9/6/2012 9:16 AM
The Optimist wrote:expand_more
Of course the money goes back to the conferences, everyone and their brother knows that. I would hopefully think that our AD asks the MAC for them to at least cover our expenses and then split up the rest. Either way, we're getting more money out of it. Unless we plan on moving out of the MAC soon, why not spread it around for the better of the league?

I do not support socialism.  


More money to the entire conference means better competition and less people laughing at how crappy our schedule is. Plus, the Love would no longer complain about our schedule. Maybe...
OhioCatFan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 15,709
mail
OhioCatFan
mail
Posted: 9/6/2012 10:17 AM
A not very practical but fun to contemplate solution: We declare ourselves an independent at the end of the season, pocket all the BCS money, and take the money to buy our way into a better conference.  We'd want to hire the same firm that WVU did when the exited the Big East before their contract was up.  
OU_Country
General User
Member Since: 12/6/2005
Location: On the road between Athens and Madison County
Post Count: 8,401
mail
OU_Country
mail
Posted: 9/6/2012 12:00 PM
The Optimist wrote:expand_more
Of course the money goes back to the conferences, everyone and their brother knows that. I would hopefully think that our AD asks the MAC for them to at least cover our expenses and then split up the rest. Either way, we're getting more money out of it. Unless we plan on moving out of the MAC soon, why not spread it around for the better of the league?

I do not support socialism.  


I agree.  EMU (my favorite example) doesn't deserve a penny from any MAC profits that result from a big bowl game until they can manage to be a D-1 school. 
mf279801
General User
M279801
Member Since: 8/6/2010
Location: Newark, DE
Post Count: 2,486
person
mail
mf279801
mail
Posted: 9/6/2012 2:11 PM
OU_Country wrote:expand_more
Of course the money goes back to the conferences, everyone and their brother knows that. I would hopefully think that our AD asks the MAC for them to at least cover our expenses and then split up the rest. Either way, we're getting more money out of it. Unless we plan on moving out of the MAC soon, why not spread it around for the better of the league?

I do not support socialism.  


I agree.  EMU (my favorite example) doesn't deserve a penny from any MAC profits that result from a big bowl game until they can manage to be a D-1 school. 


The MAC being a voluntary association, this isn't really socalism, more communitarianism (sp?). It'd be socalism if the governor's office seized the pay-day check and then redistributed it evenly to the athletic department coffers of every college/university in the state in a one-size fits all manner.
Last Edited: 9/6/2012 2:11:46 PM by mf279801
The Optimist
General User
Member Since: 3/16/2007
Location: CLE
Post Count: 5,611
mail
The Optimist
mail
Posted: 9/6/2012 2:26 PM
I don't think it'd really be socialism until we spread the wins around too.  Fans too.  EMU is lacking.
Nash'Cat
General User
Member Since: 3/29/2012
Location: Nashville, TN
Post Count: 156
mail
Nash'Cat
mail
Posted: 9/6/2012 3:13 PM
OhioCatFan wrote:expand_more
A not very practical but fun to contemplate solution: We declare ourselves an independent at the end of the season, pocket all the BCS money, and take the money to buy our way into a better conference.  We'd want to hire the same firm that WVU did when the exited the Big East before their contract was up.  


Now there's a thought I haven't toyed with yet. I always sat back assuming we would build up the following and brand name, and eventually be good enough that we can't be ignored and get invited to a bigger conference...This is indeed an interesting thought to contemplate, as you said.
lovebobcat
General User
L
Member Since: 12/23/2004
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Post Count: 548
person
mail
lovebobcat
mail
Posted: 9/6/2012 11:44 PM
Sorry to be the wet blanket on this thread of optimism, but if we go 13-0, we don't go to the BCS. Not saying it couldn't happen in the future, but not this year.

Check the history on non-BCS schools trying to qualify for a BCS bowl. OU would definitely have to be a top-10 team in the final BCS rankings to even get a sniff. Only seven times has a non-BCS school made a BCS bowl... while six times such a team finished in the top 10 and got bypassed.

This team would have to win every game by 30 points or more to get anywhere near the top 10. The strength of schedule just isn't there. It takes a while to become Boise State or TCU. We should all honestly be thrilled if this team wins the MAC -- since it hasn't happened in my lifetime (!) -- and wins another bowl game. Playing a Big 10 team in the Pizza Bowl would be plenty cool. If this team goes undefeated, it would be incredible, and it would set the table for recruiting and future teams. But this team should NOT be judged a disappointment if it fails to go undefeated.

Don't forget that a few years ago, Ball State went undefeated in the regular season ... but then lost the MAC title game, lost its bowl game, and has hardly been seen since. This program needs consistent growth, and that's what we've been getting!

Let's build one step at a time. Win one Saturday and go from there.

For now, let's just enjoy the ride.
Showing Messages: 1 - 25 of 146



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)