menu
Logo
Ohio Football Topic
Topic: Znidar's weighs in on team's injuries
Page: 1 of 1
bobcatsquared
General User
B
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 5,848
person
mail
bobcatsquared
mail
Posted: 12/4/2012 7:37 AM
OUBobcat13
General User
OUB13
Member Since: 12/8/2005
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Post Count: 285
person
mail
OUBobcat13
mail
Posted: 12/4/2012 8:47 AM
bobcatsquared wrote:expand_more


I thought he was a judge in Bel Air.
Bobcatbob
General User
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Coolville, OH
Post Count: 1,351
mail
Bobcatbob
mail
Posted: 12/4/2012 9:05 AM
As I read this article this morning it got me wondering if the IPF (or MPF) will benefit us in reducing injury.  I run - a lot - and I know that weather, surface conditions and the like play a huge role in how muscles and joints react and recover.  With practices now being outdoors and often on the hard patch of dirt behind Peden, that combination has to be brutal on legs.
Does anyone know of studies or ad hoc riffs on injury rates indoors on turf vs. outdoors on dirt?  With the proliferation of turf and indoor facilities, the question must have come up.
C Money
General User
Member Since: 8/28/2010
Post Count: 3,420
mail
C Money
mail
Posted: 12/4/2012 9:08 AM
OUBobcat13 wrote:expand_more


I thought he was a judge in Bel Air.


And a FANTASTIC dancer.
mf279801
General User
M279801
Member Since: 8/6/2010
Location: Newark, DE
Post Count: 2,486
person
mail
mf279801
mail
Posted: 12/4/2012 10:02 AM
Bobcatbob wrote:expand_more
As I read this article this morning it got me wondering if the IPF (or MPF) will benefit us in reducing injury.  I run - a lot - and I know that weather, surface conditions and the like play a huge role in how muscles and joints react and recover.  With practices now being outdoors and often on the hard patch of dirt behind Peden, that combination has to be brutal on legs.
Does anyone know of studies or ad hoc riffs on injury rates indoors on turf vs. outdoors on dirt?  With the proliferation of turf and indoor facilities, the question must have come up.


I feel like this came up on one of the IPF threads when it was first announced, or during the fundraising campaign
Monroe Slavin
General User
MS
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121
person
mail
Monroe Slavin
mail
Posted: 12/4/2012 10:05 AM
So we know that L-Monroe is led by the qb and a star receiver.  Will we do anything to key on those two?
LoganElm_grad09
General User
LE09
Member Since: 9/9/2010
Location: South Bloomingville, OH
Post Count: 934
person
mail
LoganElm_grad09
mail
Posted: 12/4/2012 10:08 AM
Bobcatbob wrote:expand_more
As I read this article this morning it got me wondering if the IPF (or MPF) will benefit us in reducing injury.  I run - a lot - and I know that weather, surface conditions and the like play a huge role in how muscles and joints react and recover.  With practices now being outdoors and often on the hard patch of dirt behind Peden, that combination has to be brutal on legs.
Does anyone know of studies or ad hoc riffs on injury rates indoors on turf vs. outdoors on dirt?  With the proliferation of turf and indoor facilities, the question must have come up.


No studies here, a personal note.  When I was a junior in high school, we practiced on a grass field behind our stadium.  By halfway through the season, there were huge patches of dirt on the field and you could see dirt flying in the air when we were running.  We had a lot of kids get injured. 

I would think that the IPF would cut down on a lot of injuries.  Would also help if we practiced on the same playing surface we played on.
LoganElm_grad09
General User
LE09
Member Since: 9/9/2010
Location: South Bloomingville, OH
Post Count: 934
person
mail
LoganElm_grad09
mail
Posted: 12/4/2012 10:12 AM
Monroe Slavin wrote:expand_more
So we know that L-Monroe is led by the qb and a star receiver.  Will we do anything to key on those two?


They get 146 yards per game on the ground.  We MUST get pressure on their qb and make their passing game suffer.
Pataskala
General User
P
Member Since: 7/8/2010
Location: At least six feet away from anybody else
Post Count: 9,465
person
mail
Pataskala
mail
Posted: 12/4/2012 11:30 AM
OUBobcat13 wrote:expand_more


I thought he was a judge in Bel Air.


Didn't he play Donna Reed's husband on "The Donna Reed Show"?
BillyTheCat
General User
BTC
Member Since: 10/6/2012
Post Count: 10,802
person
mail
BillyTheCat
mail
Posted: 12/4/2012 11:54 AM
mf279801 wrote:expand_more
As I read this article this morning it got me wondering if the IPF (or MPF) will benefit us in reducing injury.  I run - a lot - and I know that weather, surface conditions and the like play a huge role in how muscles and joints react and recover.  With practices now being outdoors and often on the hard patch of dirt behind Peden, that combination has to be brutal on legs.
Does anyone know of studies or ad hoc riffs on injury rates indoors on turf vs. outdoors on dirt?  With the proliferation of turf and indoor facilities, the question must have come up.


I feel like this came up on one of the IPF threads when it was first announced, or during the fundraising campaign


Football practices in Peden on the Field Turf for every practice, except maybe a light monday.  IPF will have same surface in it as Peden.

Not to mention the grass fields behind Peden are neither dirt patches nor are they hard.  Every day when I'm running after work I see those things being watered by the irrigation system, so they cannot be hard.
Last Edited: 12/4/2012 12:03:38 PM by BillyTheCat
OUcats82
General User
Member Since: 1/9/2005
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Post Count: 1,912
mail
OUcats82
mail
Posted: 12/4/2012 12:23 PM
C Money wrote:expand_more


I thought he was a judge in Bel Air.


And a FANTASTIC dancer.


Don't forget his outstanding fashion sense too!
Bobcat110alum
General User
Member Since: 7/7/2010
Location: Columbus, OH
Post Count: 470
mail
Bobcat110alum
mail
Posted: 12/4/2012 3:45 PM
BillyTheCat wrote:expand_more
As I read this article this morning it got me wondering if the IPF (or MPF) will benefit us in reducing injury.  I run - a lot - and I know that weather, surface conditions and the like play a huge role in how muscles and joints react and recover.  With practices now being outdoors and often on the hard patch of dirt behind Peden, that combination has to be brutal on legs.
Does anyone know of studies or ad hoc riffs on injury rates indoors on turf vs. outdoors on dirt?  With the proliferation of turf and indoor facilities, the question must have come up.


I feel like this came up on one of the IPF threads when it was first announced, or during the fundraising campaign


Football practices in Peden on the Field Turf for every practice, except maybe a light monday.  IPF will have same surface in it as Peden.

Not to mention the grass fields behind Peden are neither dirt patches nor are they hard.  Every day when I'm running after work I see those things being watered by the irrigation system, so they cannot be hard.


Occasionally the 110 practices back there before midweek night games.  It's a pretty nice grass field.  
Showing Messages: 1 - 12 of 12
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)