menu
Logo
Ohio Football Topic
Topic: Bowl Game Thought
Page: 1 of 1
71 BOBCAT
General User
71B
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Post Count: 1,954
person
mail
71 BOBCAT
mail
Posted: 1/1/2013 9:59 AM
I can't help but think that, because the play calling in this game yielded such great results, that we wouldn't be thinking about using this play book for 2013.

OU...OH YEA



GO BOBCATS
Bcat2
General User
B2
Member Since: 7/6/2010
Post Count: 4,295
person
mail
Bcat2
mail
Posted: 1/1/2013 11:53 AM
71 BOBCAT wrote:expand_more
I can't help but think that, because the play calling in this game yielded such great results, that we wouldn't be thinking about using this play book for 2013.

OU...OH YEA



GO BOBCATS


Again, La Monroe's DC set his secondary up to fail, prepared them to sell out against the run. Who ever prepared the scouting report on Ohio did not do their due diligence.  I am confident any time the defense wishes to challenge Ohio to beat them one on one coach Albin will call the plays, a coach Gdowski prepped QB (TT or Vick) will be glad to wing it downfield and coach Dixon prepped receivers (any of them) will be on the other end.  Next up is Louisville who aint no La Monroe.  Those birds will be smarter and will, I expect, challenge Ohio to beat them with the run or short passing game.  If the next game does not yield two receivers over 100 yards, but, two rushers over 100 it will not be because coach Albin forgot about his receivers, Louisville will have their say in how the game evolves. 
Last Edited: 1/1/2013 2:00:54 PM by Bcat2
L.C.
General User
LC
Member Since: 9/1/2005
Post Count: 10,584
person
mail
L.C.
mail
Posted: 1/1/2013 1:49 PM
Had the ULM safeties been staying back in deep coverage, instead of biting hard on the run fakes, then the deep passes would have been tosses into double coverage. Rather than throwing into the double coverage, Ohio would have run more Beau, and more underneath routes. You have to give credit to Ohio players/coaches for taking advantage of the opportunity, but at its core, ULM's defensive plan didn't work out well for them.
Pataskala
General User
P
Member Since: 7/8/2010
Location: At least six feet away from anybody else
Post Count: 9,465
person
mail
Pataskala
mail
Posted: 1/1/2013 2:29 PM
I think ULM looked at the last month of the season, saw how inept Ohio's passing game had looked and decided to sell out against the run and short passes.  They didn't count on Ohio working on the longer passing game, including the blocking schemes, and making marked improvements there.  Then after the first drive, they failed to make proper adjustments, so Ohio scored easily again.  Plus, having some people healthy again on both sides of the ball really helped.  I think what the game will do is make our early opponents next season less willing to sell out, thus making our running game more effective. 
Monroe Slavin
General User
MS
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121
person
mail
Monroe Slavin
mail
Posted: 1/1/2013 5:28 PM
Between the guys who gained experience and the receivers who we'll put on the field for the first time next year...and should TT build 3-4 more yards of arm strength, yeah, the passing game.

Then, you have Beau, Boykin, Daz etc.
Showing Messages: 1 - 5 of 5
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)