I haven't had time to analyze it for every team yet (though perhaps this evening after work), but it looks like we aren't getting shafted this year. Actually, the MAC office must have felt bad for us because we seem to benefit from having as much as or more rest as all of our conference opponents. In short:
We and our opponents have equal rest 5 times (CMU, EMU, Miami, Buffalo, BGSU)
We have marginally more rest (1 day) once (Kent)
We have much more rest (4 days, 7 days) twice (UMASS and Akron, respectively)
| |
OHIO's Rest (Days) |
Opponent's Rest (Days) |
| Akron |
14 |
7 |
| CMU |
7 |
7 |
| EMU |
7 |
7 |
| Miami |
7 |
7 |
| Buffalo |
10 |
10 |
| BGSU |
7 |
7 |
| Kent |
7 |
6 |
| UMASS |
10 |
6 |
All in all, I'd say that thats fairly favorable, with the caveat I haven't looks at the rest of the pair-wise comparisons to see just how favorable our favorable-looking schedule actually is, if they were ranked most-to-least favorable.
EDIT: After some further research, we owe somebody in the MAC offices a fruit basket or a Shuffle or something along those lines. We have the best schedule in the MAC. As I noted above, we have 12 more days of rest between games than our opponents. The next closest team in those terms is CMU (+10), and Kent State (+3) is the closest to us in the East. The cherry on top: Miami has the least favorable breakdown, having 11 fewer days rest than their opponents.
| Team |
Score |
| OHIO |
12 |
| CMU |
10 |
| WMU |
9 |
| Kent St |
3 |
| UMASS |
3 |
| EMU |
3 |
| NIU |
-1 |
| Akron |
-3 |
| Ball State |
-5 |
| Buffalo |
-5 |
| BGSU |
-7 |
| Toledo |
-8 |
| Miami |
-11 |
Last Edited: 3/1/2013 8:07:51 PM by mf279801