menu
Logo
Ohio Football Topic
Topic: Richard Vedder's real motivations?
Page: 1 of 1
SBH
General User
SBH
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 4,679
person
mail
SBH
mail
Posted: 5/24/2013 5:10 PM
The following was written by a former Akron political writer/now blogger.  Additional reports are that some of the funds supporting Vedder and others comes from the infamous Koch brothers:



 There they go again:  The Beacon Journal ran another op-ed piece by Richard Vedder, the conservative  Ohio University  economics professor emeritus who is being paid $150,000 a year to write his slants by an outfit named Donors Trust.  It is sort of a laundering operation that channels huge amounts of contributions to ideologically compatible "liberty-minded" charities.   Fine. But shouldn't the reader be told that? Vedder did disclose in his most recent column that a Forbes magazine ranking of college president salaries that he used for resource material was compiled by his own think tank. 
I've long believed that if you want a strong college degree,  become a conservative economist.  There's money in it.

L.C.
General User
LC
Member Since: 9/1/2005
Post Count: 10,584
person
mail
L.C.
mail
Posted: 5/24/2013 9:53 PM
Is this somehow related to football? If so, I missed the connection.
RSBobcat
General User
Member Since: 8/23/2010
Location: Columbus, OH
Post Count: 4,504
mail
RSBobcat
mail
Posted: 5/24/2013 11:42 PM
L.C. wrote:expand_more
Is this somehow related to football? If so, I missed the connection.


Here's my take-away - If you benefit from fat checks from special interests groups - and your "cred" is bolstered by the fact that you are an employee of OHIO - then why aren't you a Bobcat Club member - at even the measliest level? Especially since most who see your "cred" reference likely confuse it w/ Ohio A&M - unless of course you agree that OHIO athletics has brought more recognition to this fine institution than the Economics Dept...............
Robert Fox
General User
RF
Member Since: 11/17/2004
Location: Knoxville, TN
Post Count: 2,039
person
mail
Robert Fox
mail
Posted: 5/25/2013 10:05 AM
Don't worry. I'm sure he'll be audited soon.
jumper80
General User
J80
Member Since: 5/11/2006
Post Count: 123
person
mail
jumper80
mail
Posted: 5/25/2013 11:24 AM
no doubt
mf279801
General User
M279801
Member Since: 8/6/2010
Location: Newark, DE
Post Count: 2,486
person
mail
mf279801
mail
Posted: 5/25/2013 1:34 PM
He's easily the best professor I had at OHIO (and he was well away from my major field of study), so leave him be.

Also, wrong forum.
Alan Swank
General User
AS
Member Since: 12/12/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 7,375
person
mail
Alan Swank
mail
Posted: 5/25/2013 2:11 PM
mf279801 wrote:expand_more
He's easily the best professor I had at OHIO (and he was well away from my major field of study), so leave him be.

Also, wrong forum.


Is that the only class you made it to?  As for the forum, he has consistently been a critic of the amount of money spent on athletics particularly football so SBH's post is in exactly the right spot.
SBH
General User
SBH
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 4,679
person
mail
SBH
mail
Posted: 5/25/2013 2:50 PM
I wonder how Richard Vedder would react if he discovered that Rod McDavis were using his position as an Ohio University employee to publish articles while also being paid $150,000 for that service by a shadow political organization.  Oh, I guarantee he would erupt in outrage on op-ed pages across the state.  His most recent piece, on salaries of university presidents, took a gratuitous swipe at McDavis in the first few paragraphs.  He's a (well-compensated) hypocrite.
mf279801
General User
M279801
Member Since: 8/6/2010
Location: Newark, DE
Post Count: 2,486
person
mail
mf279801
mail
Posted: 5/25/2013 4:55 PM
Alan Swank wrote:expand_more
He's easily the best professor I had at OHIO (and he was well away from my major field of study), so leave him be.

Also, wrong forum.


Is that the only class you made it to?  As for the forum, he has consistently been a critic of the amount of money spent on athletics particularly football so SBH's post is in exactly the right spot.


Biological Sciences, Class of 2005, Summa Cum Laude. I stand by my original statement. 

So what? The quoted portion of the article, and SBH's comments, are attacking Dr. Vedder for the sin of not being a leftist, nothing to do with football.
BillyTheCat
General User
BTC
Member Since: 10/6/2012
Post Count: 10,802
person
mail
BillyTheCat
mail
Posted: 5/25/2013 5:39 PM
Dr. Vedder has accomplished more here in his field then probably anyone here. The guy is well respected in his work, even though we may not always agree with him.
SBH
General User
SBH
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 4,679
person
mail
SBH
mail
Posted: 5/25/2013 5:46 PM
I don't really care whether or not he's conservative.  I question why he doesn't disclose that he is paid by a political group to write articles reflecting their viewpoints, all while the newspapers (which also pay him) have assumed he is being an honest proponent of a given viewpoint. And he does so while wearing the badge of "university professor." The lack of disclosure is rather troubling, and no one has addressed the question about how he would react if his boss did the same thing.  He's a hypocrite, whether well accomplished in his field or not.  


BillyTheCat
General User
BTC
Member Since: 10/6/2012
Post Count: 10,802
person
mail
BillyTheCat
mail
Posted: 5/25/2013 6:07 PM
SBH: I will agree he would be well served to disclose any outside interest of which he would be writing about.
Alan Swank
General User
AS
Member Since: 12/12/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 7,375
person
mail
Alan Swank
mail
Posted: 5/25/2013 8:57 PM
mf279801 wrote:expand_more
He's easily the best professor I had at OHIO (and he was well away from my major field of study), so leave him be.

Also, wrong forum.


Is that the only class you made it to?  As for the forum, he has consistently been a critic of the amount of money spent on athletics particularly football so SBH's post is in exactly the right spot.


Biological Sciences, Class of 2005, Summa Cum Laude. I stand by my original statement. 

So what? The quoted portion of the article, and SBH's comments, are attacking Dr. Vedder for the sin of not being a leftist, nothing to do with football.


One would think that a scl grad would do a little research before standing by his statements.  This guy, I say again, has consistently questioned the amount of money spent on athletics in previous articles.  To echo SBH's statements, he's the master of milking the system as a purported expert in all aspects of educational funding both secondary and collegiate. 
Last Edited: 5/25/2013 8:58:00 PM by Alan Swank
colobobcat66
General User
C66
Member Since: 9/1/2006
Location: Watching the bobcats run outside my window., CO
Post Count: 4,744
person
mail
colobobcat66
mail
Posted: 5/25/2013 9:01 PM
Vedder should obviously disclose any conflict of interest in anything he writes about. He is, however, not the only professor on either side of the political spectrum who is supported/ financed by other entities. Did he do anything wrong other than not agree with the politics of certain people? Not sure what " honest proponent" means in a previous post. Does that mean if you're paid by somebody, than you're being dishonest in what you write. How interesting.
JSF
General User
Member Since: 1/29/2005
Location: Houston, TX
Post Count: 6,580
mail
JSF
mail
Posted: 5/26/2013 2:23 AM
Robert Fox wrote:expand_more
Don't worry. I'm sure he'll be audited soon.


I laughed.
mf279801
General User
M279801
Member Since: 8/6/2010
Location: Newark, DE
Post Count: 2,486
person
mail
mf279801
mail
Posted: 5/26/2013 11:31 AM
SBH wrote:expand_more
I don't really care whether or not he's conservative.  I question why he doesn't disclose that he is paid by a political group to write articles reflecting their viewpoints, all while the newspapers (which also pay him) have assumed he is being an honest proponent of a given viewpoint. And he does so while wearing the badge of "university professor." The lack of disclosure is rather troubling, and no one has addressed the question about how he would react if his boss did the same thing.  He's a hypocrite, whether well accomplished in his field or not.  




Ahh. The reference to the "infamous Koch brothers" made me think that this wasn't just a polemic on the importance of disclosing one's funders, that there may have been some sort of partisan political slant to it.
Showing Messages: 1 - 16 of 16
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)