menu
Logo
Ohio Football Topic
Topic: Football Post on Basketball Forum
Page: 1 of 1
OhioCatFan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 15,699
mail
OhioCatFan
mail
Posted: 5/15/2013 8:23 PM
This goes under the heading of forgetting where you are.  In a post on the basketball forum there was a discussion that got into the issue of FBS football at good non-power conference basketball schools and whether schools like FGCU should have a D1 football program or just put the vast majority of their athletic resources into basketball.  In that context I posted the following, which I think is really more relevant here:

There are reports that under the new four-team playoff system and the new Gangof5 vs. BCS Bowl game that each G5 conference will be guaranteed  a million dollars per school up to a maximum of $12 million to be split among their members.  This means that non-AQ conferences with more than 12 members will be screwed because they won't get any extra money and will have to divided the pie into thinner slices. (Hello, MAC!)  I suspect the genesis for both the also ran BCS Bowl and the guaranteed payoffs is to forestall anti-trust suits from G5 schools.  From what I've heard the announcement on this deal is pending every single G5 school signing an agreement that would effectively prevent any anti-trust suits against the playoff system.  

Edit: This also, of course, makes it much harder for FCS schools to move up to FBS.  It will lock the existing conferences at a maximum of 12, and prevent access to newbies.  I suppose law suits could come from the FCS-level saying they are being locked out.  But this would assure the AQ schools that the other FBS schools would be on their side if any such suits should develop.   

Second Edit: There is still time for all of this to breakdown.  But, if my sources are correct, it's very interesting that this is being discussed.  It means that the arms-race that some have talked about is taking a very different trajectory than what might have been envisioned.  As is often the case, the future has a way of not adhering to our plans.  
Last Edited: 5/15/2013 8:28:35 PM by OhioCatFan
The Optimist
General User
Member Since: 3/16/2007
Location: CLE
Post Count: 5,611
mail
The Optimist
mail
Posted: 5/15/2013 10:17 PM

I had trouble deciding where to post that article.
 

I don't think funding football makes ANY sense for FGCU. Ohio football has really really changed under Frank Solich. I look at that article Ted posted from foxsportsohio about the TV coverage being well deserved and I really feel like we have arrived. Not only are we winning, but Ohio's national alumni base is starting to notice and care like never before as they get to watch Ohio football on the national stage on national TV.
 

Relating to your post OCF, I am not sold we are doomed in this ever rising arms race as many have suggested. While the money seems out of our world right now, I am convinced we are in a good position compared to other schools in FBS outside the BCS (or whatever we call that now)

OhioCatFan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 15,699
mail
OhioCatFan
mail
Posted: 5/15/2013 10:34 PM
Actually, TO, there is more money then what I've stated potentially coming our way via the new 4-team playoff system.  There's another guy here on the forum that knows the details; I'll let him post when he feels appropriate.  I'll just summarize it this way, as things are now being discussed this may be a case of the rich getting richer and the poor getting richer too with an expanding pie -- at least the poor of FBS football.  The FCS scholarship crowd may be getting screwed by having their upward mobility restricted.  (In this context FCS scholarship is used to distinguish the FCS teams that participate in the playoffs from the schools like Dayton that are in FCS non-scholarship and don't participate in the playoff system.)
Last Edited: 5/15/2013 10:36:35 PM by OhioCatFan
Showing Messages: 1 - 3 of 3
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)