menu
Logo
Ohio Football Topic
Topic: The realities of guarantee games
Page: 1 of 1
Pataskala
General User
P
Member Since: 7/8/2010
Location: At least six feet away from anybody else
Post Count: 9,465
person
mail
Pataskala
mail
Posted: 8/11/2013 11:06 AM
Interesting piece by Barnhart.  Eventually, the "haves" are likely to do away with guarantee games and play only other "haves."  But there are several realities they'll need to face.  Without games against the Akrons, EMUs and NMSUs of the world, at least half of them will likely have losing seasons.  The Big Twelv won't have nine of its ten members with winning records.  And with 50+ bowl games (likely), a lot of bowls will be disgruntled because they'll probably have small crowds and low TV interest because they'll have teams with losing records.  But the real losers will probably be those former 1AA schools that are planning to use guarantee money to pay for the huge facilities upgrades they needed to move up to 1A.
Last Edited: 8/11/2013 11:09:26 AM by Pataskala
perimeterpost
General User
Member Since: 7/6/2010
Post Count: 3,165
mail
perimeterpost
mail
Posted: 8/11/2013 11:46 AM
The Pig5 don't have the guts.

Ohio State plays 3 buyout games per year and earns avg ticket revenue per game of $5.2m. That's $15.6m - $3m in buyout for a net of $12.2m for those 3 OOC games. Change those to 1:1s and they lose 1.5 home games per year which is $7.8m in ticket revenue + travel expenses. Not going to happen.
Showing Messages: 1 - 2 of 2
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)