And then, returning to form at the Dispatch, this little gem is buried in a Sunday article about
M%$#@'s loss at Illinois:
"Illinois 50, Miami University 14: The Illini got their third win of the season early after finishing 2-10 a year ago and closing with nine straight losses. Miami (0-4) lost its third straight game to a BCS school after falling to Cincinnati last weekend and Kentucky two weeks ago"
I've been trying to figure out what this actually means. Are they insinuating that M%$#@ isn't a BCS team 'cause I thought they (and we ) were?
Are they suggesting that losing to another BCS team, let alone three, is somehow unacceptable?
Sometimes, I see things in this paper that just make me want to shake my head. I suppose this is a wire service report but, geez, don't that edit this stuff?
A lot of people use BCS and AQ interchangeably. Theoretically, all 1A (FBS) schools are BCS because they have a shot at a BCS bowl, although some can automatically qualify by winning their conference and others have to meet other criteria.
I think NIU is the only MAC team with a realistic hope of getting to a BCS bowl this year. Even if Ohio, BG or BSU wins out, the one loss each has will likely be enough to keep them out of the top 16. We were hammered by L'ville; BG was hammered by Indiana; BSU lost to North Texas (could hear Herbie yelling about that one). BG and BSU can still make noise @Miss St & Virginia, respectively, but I don't think it'll be enough to overcome the earlier losses in the minds of voters. BSU may have an outside chance if they beat up on both UVA and NIU (which may be top 15 when they meet in Nov), but even then they might have to be top 25 when they meet NIU in order to get the needed bump.