Ohio Football Topic
Topic: Week Six MAC Stats
Page: 1 of 1
Bcat2
General User
B2
Member Since: 7/6/2010
Post Count: 4,295
person
mail
Bcat2
mail
Posted: 10/6/2013 8:53 AM
http://www.mac-sports.com/portals/20/MAC/Stats/2013FB/confldrs.htm

How can NIU be so good with all those penalties?

PENALTIES G No. Yards Avg/G
1. Ball State 6 22 180 30.0
2. Central Michigan 6 22 205 34.2
3. Miami 5 25 203 40.6
4. Eastern Michigan 5 26 215 43.0
5. UMass 5 28 221 44.2
6. Ohio 5 29 249 49.8
7. Bowling Green 6 31 300 50.0
8. Kent State 6 37 311 51.8
9. Akron 6 35 325 54.2
10. Western Michigan 6 36 333 55.5
11. Toledo 6 42 350 58.3
12. Buffalo 5 28 292 58.4
13. Northern Illinois 5 47 415 83.0
Eagle66
General User
E66
Member Since: 3/13/2005
Post Count: 1,329
person
mail
Eagle66
mail
Posted: 10/6/2013 9:22 AM
Bcat2 wrote:expand_more
http://www.mac-sports.com/portals/20/MAC/Stats/2013FB/confldrs.htm

How can NIU be so good with all those penalties?

PENALTIES G No. Yards Avg/G
1. Ball State 6 22 180 30.0
2. Central Michigan 6 22 205 34.2
3. Miami 5 25 203 40.6
4. Eastern Michigan 5 26 215 43.0
5. UMass 5 28 221 44.2
6. Ohio 5 29 249 49.8
7. Bowling Green 6 31 300 50.0
8. Kent State 6 37 311 51.8
9. Akron 6 35 325 54.2
10. Western Michigan 6 36 333 55.5
11. Toledo 6 42 350 58.3
12. Buffalo 5 28 292 58.4
13. Northern Illinois 5 47 415 83.0


wow. Akron had 135 of those 325 yesterday alone. 
Mike Johnson
General User
Member Since: 11/11/2004
Location: North Canton, OH
Post Count: 1,756
mail
Mike Johnson
mail
Posted: 10/6/2013 11:28 AM
Bcat2 wrote:expand_more
http://www.mac-sports.com/portals/20/MAC/Stats/2013FB/confldrs.htm

How can NIU be so good with all those penalties?

PENALTIES G No. Yards Avg/G
1. Ball State 6 22 180 30.0
2. Central Michigan 6 22 205 34.2
3. Miami 5 25 203 40.6
4. Eastern Michigan 5 26 215 43.0
5. UMass 5 28 221 44.2
6. Ohio 5 29 249 49.8
7. Bowling Green 6 31 300 50.0
8. Kent State 6 37 311 51.8
9. Akron 6 35 325 54.2
10. Western Michigan 6 36 333 55.5
11. Toledo 6 42 350 58.3
12. Buffalo 5 28 292 58.4
13. Northern Illinois 5 47 415 83.0


It could be that NIU leads in penalties because it is so good.  Not saying that it is, but saying it could be.

Reason: An old memory.  I played on very strong HS teams.  We were heavily penalized.  Some penalties resulted from over-confidence and over-aggressiveness.  But others?  I remember one game when were leading big - about 30-0 - in the second quarter.  We ran an off-tackle play and our RB went 40 or so yards for the score.  Flag.  Holding.  We all looked around at each other.  Who was holding?  Back then offensive holding was 15 yards and the refs didn't identify miscreants by uniform number.  So from 15 yards farther back we ran the same play with the same RB.  Once again he went the distance.  Flag.  Holding.  Really?  So we ran the same play a third time from another 15 yards back with the same RB and, gassed though he was, he again went the distance.  TD!  At last! 

In that game we set a state record: 215 yards in penalties.  How many of them were actual infractions?  How many were attempts by officials to rein us in? 

(Note: On the first play of the second half we scored on another long play.  46-0.  That was the last play the first team played.) 
L.C.
General User
LC
Member Since: 9/1/2005
Post Count: 10,584
person
mail
L.C.
mail
Posted: 10/6/2013 1:54 PM
Mike Johnson wrote:expand_more
... Some penalties resulted from over-confidence and over-aggressiveness. 

Historically, at the high school and college level, more penalties was correlated with more winning. It seems that passive teams don't get a lot of penalties, but they don't win, either.
Showing Messages: 1 - 4 of 4
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)