menu
Logo
99+
Bobcat Attack Menu
Logo
99+
Ohio Football Topic
Topic: Miami Better Since Change
Page: 1 of 1
Bcat2
General User
B2
Member Since: 7/6/2010
Post Count: 4,295
person
mail
Bcat2
mail
Posted: 10/25/2013 7:37 PM
settings_applications edit_note

Changes on The Field As Well

First Five Games ........................................................................................ Two Games Under Bath

198.4...........................................................Offense/Game........................................................... 296.5

106.8...........................................................Passing/Game............................................................ 199.5

19.4........................................................ Passing Atts/Game..........................................................34.5

10/66 (15.2%)........................................... Third Downs.........................................................9/27 (33.3%)

35.6............................................................Scoring Defense...........................................................20.5

506.0............................................................ Total Defense.......................................................... 375.0

247.4......................................................... Rushing Defense....................................................... 137.0

258.6..........................................................Passing Defense........................................................ 238.0

1.0...................................................................Sacks/Game.......................................................... 2.0
Kevin Finnegan
General User
KF
Member Since: 2/4/2005
Location: Rockton, IL
Post Count: 1,214
person
mail
Kevin Finnegan
mail
Posted: 10/25/2013 7:57 PM
settings_applications edit_note
That comes with a Texas sized asterisk. First five games: Marshall, Kentucky, Cincinnati, etc. last two games: MAC bottom dwellers Akron and UMass.
DallasCat
General User
DC
Member Since: 4/23/2013
Location: TX
Post Count: 81
person
mail
DallasCat
mail
Posted: 10/25/2013 8:00 PM
settings_applications edit_note
Last Edited: 10/25/2013 8:01:45 PM by DallasCat
DallasCat
General User
DC
Member Since: 4/23/2013
Location: TX
Post Count: 81
person
mail
DallasCat
mail
Posted: 10/25/2013 8:02 PM
settings_applications edit_note
Last Edited: 10/25/2013 8:02:27 PM by DallasCat
Pataskala
General User
P
Member Since: 7/8/2010
Location: At least six feet away from anybody else
Post Count: 9,465
person
mail
Pataskala
mail
Posted: 10/25/2013 8:07 PM
settings_applications edit_note
Finn, you beat me to it.  The thing they're doing is throwing more -- opening up the offense a bit -- but it hasn't helped their running game yet (77 yds vs Akron last week).  Their last five games are against Ohio, BG, Buffalo, Kent & BSU, so the soft part of their schedule is over. 
C Money
General User
Member Since: 8/28/2010
Post Count: 3,420
mail
C Money
mail
Posted: 10/25/2013 8:13 PM
settings_applications edit_note

Miami sucks.

Monroe Slavin
General User
MS
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121
person
mail
Monroe Slavin
mail
Posted: 10/25/2013 8:16 PM
settings_applications edit_note
Oh, deity of your choice, please don't tell me this is a prelude to 'I told they are a good team' if we don't perform very well against a quite terrible redhawk.

The post about how terrific TT and our receivers have been lately are your case for why we should whomp on redhawk.  Don't backtrack.
L.C.
General User
LC
Member Since: 9/1/2005
Post Count: 10,584
person
mail
L.C.
mail
Posted: 10/25/2013 8:34 PM
settings_applications edit_note
It doesn't matter if they are better or not, though I tend to agree with finn. All that matters is that Miami is beaten.
mf279801
General User
M279801
Member Since: 8/6/2010
Location: Newark, DE
Post Count: 2,486
person
mail
mf279801
mail
Posted: 10/25/2013 10:40 PM
settings_applications edit_note
Gawd! Through their first 5, Miami averaged less than 98 rushing yards per game WHILE RUNNING A TRADITIONAL RUN-HEAVY OPTION LOOK. (that works out to about 2.5 yards/rushing attempt, with the caveat that the average includes yards lost due to sacks). How is that even possible?

And before you say that they faced GREAT competition...4 of those first 5 opponents are worse than average against the run (Cincinnati being the exception). The teams they played their first 5 games against (Marshall, Kentucky, Cincinnati, Illinois, CMU) give up, on average, 184.86 rushing yards/game (FBS median = 165.1) and allow their opponents to average 4.48 yards/rushing attempt (FBS median = 4.2).
OhioCatFan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 15,699
mail
OhioCatFan
mail
Posted: 10/25/2013 10:58 PM
settings_applications edit_note
Can anyone tell me how they managed to take UC late into the 4th Quarter with a 0-0 tie?  When I tuned in that game it was still 0-0.  From that point on it was all UC and Miami looked like the horrible team that they are.  But what happened in the previous three and half quarters?  Any one here watch the earlier part of game.  Was UC playing their third team to rest the starters for the next game?  
Bcat2
General User
B2
Member Since: 7/6/2010
Post Count: 4,295
person
mail
Bcat2
mail
Posted: 10/26/2013 7:29 AM
settings_applications edit_note
Monroe Slavin wrote:expand_more
Oh, deity of your choice, please don't tell me this is a prelude to 'I told they are a good team' if we don't perform very well against a quite terrible redhawk.

The post about how terrific TT and our receivers have been lately are your case for why we should whomp on redhawk.  Don't backtrack.


Monroe, I found this and just put this out there.  Sir, I have put nothing out anywhere for why we should whomp on anyone.  Setting standards is your deal.  Being upset when they are not met is your deal.  I will not join in.  I will be here hoping they do well and are not injured, though, I know there will be some.  Ohio has the right people running the program and I will stay with them through hell or high water.  That is my deal. Simple.
Pete Chouteau
General User
Member Since: 11/17/2004
Location: You Can't See Me
Post Count: 1,696
mail
Pete Chouteau
mail
Posted: 10/26/2013 7:44 AM
settings_applications edit_note
UC was virtually playing without a QB.
Pataskala
General User
P
Member Since: 7/8/2010
Location: At least six feet away from anybody else
Post Count: 9,465
person
mail
Pataskala
mail
Posted: 10/26/2013 10:15 AM
settings_applications edit_note
Pete Chouteau wrote:expand_more
UC was virtually playing without a QB.


And Fiami had two weeks for prep.
Monroe Slavin
General User
MS
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121
person
mail
Monroe Slavin
mail
Posted: 10/26/2013 11:39 AM
settings_applications edit_note
Bcat2 wrote:expand_more
Oh, deity of your choice, please don't tell me this is a prelude to 'I told they are a good team' if we don't perform very well against a quite terrible redhawk.

The post about how terrific TT and our receivers have been lately are your case for why we should whomp on redhawk.  Don't backtrack.


Monroe, I found this and just put this out there.  Sir, I have put nothing out anywhere for why we should whomp on anyone.  Setting standards is your deal.  Being upset when they are not met is your deal.  I will not join in.  I will be here hoping they do well and are not injured, though, I know there will be some.  Ohio has the right people running the program and I will stay with them through hell or high water.  That is my deal. Simple.


No standards!  No expectations that we should perform up to any reasonable levels!  Everyone gets a trophy!
Showing Messages: 1 - 14 of 14
reply
vertical_align_top
vertical_align_center
vertical_align_bottom
add_comment
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)