Alan, How about the example of Cleveland St. Joe, once a Div. 1 powerhouse with alumni like Clark Kellogg, competing now at Div. 4 with the same type of roster from the old days? I believe they had guys at 6-10, 6-8, 6-8 etc. this year. Should they feel good about their trophy competing against the little guys? When they played at the state tourney this yr. - it brought out lots of college coaches because there were several being recruited Div. I college. It is that type of situation that hopefully gets remedied!
You make some good points but first let's get the facts right. VASJ competed at the D 3 level this year not D 4 and was one of the smallest D 3 schools in the state. They had 122 boys for the official count. This rule would not affect them in the least even if every boy on the team counted as a 2. The only teams that this will affect are those that are just below the cut off for their division. Additionally it does nothing for the disparity between the smallest D 1 schools and the largest. If I'm a parent of a student and depending where we live, sending my child to one of these "powerhouses" might be their best educational option. On the flip side, with these crazy contracts that teachers in the Cincinnati and Cleveland dioceses are being forced to sign, I couldn't with a clear conscious send my kid to those schools either (but that's another thread for another time).
It will be interesting to see how this plays out but my gut feeling is that it will change very little in terms of the teams that play for the state championships every year.
http://www.ohsaa.org/members/sptdivis13.htm
Last Edited: 5/18/2014 10:32:47 AM by Alan Swank