menu
Logo
99+
Bobcat Attack Menu
Logo
99+
Ohio Football Topic
Topic: MAC Stats
Page: 1 of 1
Bcat2
General User
B2
Member Since: 7/6/2010
Post Count: 4,295
person
mail
Bcat2
mail
Posted: 10/27/2013 12:57 AM
settings_applications edit_note
http://www.mac-sports.com/portals/20/MAC/Stats/2013FB/confldrs.htm

Rushing Def up two places to third.

TT still most efficient.

Ohio now leads in team sacks and third down conversions.

NIU has the poorest pass defense.

Foster climbing the charts.
L.C.
General User
LC
Member Since: 9/1/2005
Post Count: 10,584
person
mail
L.C.
mail
Posted: 10/27/2013 8:28 AM
settings_applications edit_note
Bcat2 wrote:expand_more
...NIU has the poorest pass defense.

...or 2d best, if you look at pass efficiency defense.
Bcat2
General User
B2
Member Since: 7/6/2010
Post Count: 4,295
person
mail
Bcat2
mail
Posted: 10/27/2013 8:53 AM
settings_applications edit_note
L.C. wrote:expand_more
...NIU has the poorest pass defense.

...or 2d best, if you look at pass efficiency defense.


Yes, guess you could accuse me of spinning stats. 
C Money
General User
Member Since: 8/28/2010
Post Count: 3,420
mail
C Money
mail
Posted: 10/27/2013 8:58 AM
settings_applications edit_note
Buffalo is +15 in turnovers???

Two thoughts:
(1) No wonder they are undefeated in MAC play so far.
(2) I think (hope) we'll see some regression to the mean in the 2nd half of the season.
Bcat2
General User
B2
Member Since: 7/6/2010
Post Count: 4,295
person
mail
Bcat2
mail
Posted: 10/27/2013 9:50 AM
settings_applications edit_note
C Money wrote:expand_more
Buffalo is +15 in turnovers???

Two thoughts:
(1) No wonder they are undefeated in MAC play so far.
(2) I think (hope) we'll see some regression to the mean in the 2nd half of the season.


At some point someone is going to face Prior/Lechner/Powell/Johnson/McGrath/Hill/Foster/Waters/Cochran/Mario/Beau/Ryan and Talbert all healthy and there will be smiles all round.
71 BOBCAT
General User
71B
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Post Count: 1,954
person
mail
71 BOBCAT
mail
Posted: 10/27/2013 9:51 AM
settings_applications edit_note
Some great coach once said "winning takes care of everything" meaning stats will show how good you are based on your record.





GO BOBCATS
Bcat2
General User
B2
Member Since: 7/6/2010
Post Count: 4,295
person
mail
Bcat2
mail
Posted: 10/30/2013 11:15 AM
settings_applications edit_note
Help me with what this means? If anything.

Red Zone Offense.  Ohio has more scores than Buffalo has chances. 

Also does anyone know, regarding Neutz, he is averaging 16 per catch, is he getting YAC or is he getting these receptions beyond 10 yards.

3rd Down Conversions.  Opponents have converted 59 times against Ohio, highest in the MAC.  Last year Buffalo converted 30 in their loss.  I expect their game to be the same except to keep Daz from breaking a return, convert about 30 first downs and win this time.  Others have said, Ohio will need to win the 1st quarter and play with the lead. Take the ball out of Oliver's hands.


Red Zone Touchdowns Field Goals Lost possession
RED ZONE OFFENSE G Scores-Chances  Pct. TDs Rush-Pass Made-Att Fumb Int. Downs Other
1. Toledo 8 26-29 89.7 19 13-6 7-8 1 1 0 0
2. Ball State 9 39-45 86.7 31 16-15 8-9 2 1 2 0
3. Bowling Green 8 31-36 86.1 24 18-6 7-8 0 0 2 2
4. Northern Illinois 8 41-48 85.4 31 16-15 10-11 1 2 2 1
5. Buffalo 8 26-32 81.2 22 12-10 4-7 2 0 1 0
6. Ohio 8 33-42 78.6 25 13-12 8-11 1 2 3 0
  Central Michigan 8 22-28 78.6 15 6-9 7-10 1 0 1 1
8. Western Michigan 9 17-22 77.3 12 5-7 5-6 0 1 3 0
9. Kent State 9 17-23 73.9 13 7-6 4-8 0 1 1 0
10. Akron 9 16-22 72.7 14 8-6 2-5 1 1 1 0
11. Eastern Michigan 8 16-23 69.6 13 8-5 3-4 1 3 2 0
12. UMass 8 9-14 64.3 7 3-4 2-5 1 1 0 0
13. Miami 8 8-14 57.1 8 3-5 0-2 0 1 3 0
 
  Red Zone Touchdowns Field Goals Lost possession
RED ZONE DEFENSE G Scores-Chances  Pct. TDs Rush-Pass Made-Att Fumb Int. Downs Other
1. Bowling Green 8 14-24 58.3 14 9-5 0-4 3 0 3 0
2. Ohio 8 16-24 66.7 12 6-6 4-9 0 1 1 1
3. Buffalo 8 18-26 69.2 13 8-5 5-8 1 2 2 0
4. UMass 8 18-25 72.0 12 6-6 6-6 1 2 0 4
5. Miami 8 32-44 72.7 25 15-10 7-12 1 2 0 4
6. Ball State 9 19-26 73.1 15 10-5 4-7 1 1 2 0
7. Kent State 9 37-45 82.2 31 19-12 6-8 1 2 2 1
8. Western Michigan 9 33-40 82.5 23 17-6 10-13 2 0 1 1
9. Akron 9 35-42 83.3 28 13-15 7-9 1 1 2 1
10. Central Michigan 8 30-35 85.7 25 17-8 5-6 1 2 1 0
11. Eastern Michigan 8 29-33 87.9 26 17-9 3-4 1 1 1 0
12. Toledo 8 32-36 88.9 25 19-6 7-8 1 0 0 2
13. Northern Illinois 8 21-23 91.3 16 6-10 5-5 0 1 1 0

SCORING OFFENSE G TD FG XPT 2XP DXP Saf Points Avg/G
1. Northern Illinois 8 42 14 41 0 0 0 335 41.9
2. Ball State 9 47 10 43 0 0 0 355 39.4
3. Ohio 8 34 10 33 0 0 1 269 33.6
4. Buffalo 8 32 9 27 0 0 1 248 31.0
5. Toledo 8 30 12 28 0 0 0 244 30.5
6. Bowling Green 8 30 9 28 1 0 0 237 29.6
7. Akron 9 24 5 22 0 0 0 181 20.1
8. Eastern Michigan 8 21 4 18 1 0 0 158 19.8
9. Kent State 9 22 6 20 2 0 0 174 19.3
10. Central Michigan 8 18 8 17 0 0 0 149 18.6
11. Western Michigan 9 17 7 15 0 0 0 138 15.3
12. Miami 8 11 4 9 0 0 0 87 10.9
13. UMass 8 11 3 10 0 0 0 85 10.6
 
SCORING DEFENSE G TD FG XPT 2XP DXP Saf Points Avg/G
1. Bowling Green 8 21 0 20 1 0 0 148 18.5
2. Ohio 8 23 5 21 0 0 0 174 21.8
3. Buffalo 8 23 7 20 2 0 0 183 22.9
4. Ball State 9 26 10 24 1 0 0 212 23.6
5. Northern Illinois 8 27 7 23 0 0 0 206 25.8
6. Toledo 8 28 8 26 1 0 0 220 27.5
7. UMass 8 29 9 28 0 0 1 231 28.9
8. Kent State 9 38 8 36 0 0 0 288 32.0
9. Miami 8 34 7 33 1 0 0 260 32.5
10. Akron 9 38 9 35 1 0 1 294 32.7
11. Central Michigan 8 35 8 31 1 0 0 267 33.4
12. Western Michigan 9 42 13 37 1 0 0 330 36.7
13. Eastern Michigan 8 49 4 47 1 0 0 355 44.4
 
3RD-DOWN CONVERSIONS G Conv. Att. Pct.
1. Ohio 8 55 112 49.1
2. Bowling Green 8 52 107 48.6
3. Ball State 9 55 118 46.6
4. Akron 9 61 143 42.7
5. Northern Illinois 8 47 115 40.9
6. UMass 8 49 123 39.8
7. Toledo 8 39 101 38.6
8. Central Michigan 8 41 107 38.3
9. Kent State 9 49 129 38.0
10. Buffalo 8 43 118 36.4
11. Eastern Michigan 8 39 113 34.5
12. Western Michigan 9 37 138 26.8
13. Miami 8 26 113 23.0
 
OPP 3RD-DN CONVERT G Conv. Att. Pct.
1. Buffalo 8 40 112 35.7
2. Northern Illinois 8 49 135 36.3
3. Ball State 9 56 141 39.7
4. Bowling Green 8 43 105 41.0
5. Akron 9 56 130 43.1
6. Western Michigan 9 56 129 43.4
7. Toledo 8 48 109 44.0
8. UMass 8 47 104 45.2
9. Eastern Michigan 8 41 89 46.1
10. Ohio 8 59 127 46.5
11. Kent State 9 53 112 47.3
12. Miami 8 56 116 48.3
13. Central Michigan 8 55 110 50.0
 
Last Edited: 10/30/2013 11:26:10 AM by Bcat2
OhioStunter
General User
Member Since: 2/18/2005
Location: Chicago
Post Count: 2,516
mail
OhioStunter
mail
Posted: 10/30/2013 11:20 AM
settings_applications edit_note
Bcat2 wrote:expand_more
http://www.mac-sports.com/portals/20/MAC/Stats/2013FB/confldrs.htm

Rushing Def up two places to third.

TT still most efficient.

Ohio now leads in team sacks and third down conversions.

NIU has the poorest pass defense.

Foster climbing the charts.

Good stats. Thanks for posting and providing the link so we can look at other stats.

 
colobobcat66
General User
C66
Member Since: 9/1/2006
Location: Watching the bobcats run outside my window., CO
Post Count: 4,744
person
mail
colobobcat66
mail
Posted: 10/30/2013 12:25 PM
settings_applications edit_note
Without checking, I thought Austin Peay had quite a few red zone missed chances which skews that defensive stat for us.
Casper71
General User
C71
Member Since: 12/1/2006
Post Count: 3,237
person
mail
Casper71
mail
Posted: 10/30/2013 12:43 PM
settings_applications edit_note
Gonna take 30+ to win those one.  Both give up in the low 20s and score in the low 30s.  I think 35-31 OHIO!
L.C.
General User
LC
Member Since: 9/1/2005
Post Count: 10,584
person
mail
L.C.
mail
Posted: 10/30/2013 12:59 PM
settings_applications edit_note
Casper71 wrote:expand_more
Gonna take 30+ to win those one.  Both give up in the low 20s and score in the low 30s.  I think 35-31 OHIO!

I'm thinking the score will be lower. Take out games against ranked foes, Ohio is winning by 37-18, while Buffalo is inning by 36-12. I'm thinking this will be a defensive battle, won by field goals and turnovers.
Monroe Slavin
General User
MS
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121
person
mail
Monroe Slavin
mail
Posted: 5/24/2014 2:07 PM
settings_applications edit_note
I randomly went back 20 pages to find something old.

This thread was right before we played Beefs.  Certain viewpoints were overly optimistic.

The good news:  I recently speaked with a veteran of this board, a respected stalwart.  He said some things which lead me to believe that Coach will have a much firmer hand on this year's squad.  I'm a bit more optimistic, though still worried about the o-line and offensive backfield.

I don't wanna win shootouts.  I want our D to avg giving up 13.2 per game, something nicely quite low.

 
Bcat2
General User
B2
Member Since: 7/6/2010
Post Count: 4,295
person
mail
Bcat2
mail
Posted: 5/24/2014 6:47 PM
settings_applications edit_note
Monroe Slavin wrote:expand_more
I randomly went back 20 pages to find something old.

This thread was right before we played Beefs. Certain viewpoints were overly optimistic.

The good news: I recently speaked with a veteran of this board, a respected stalwart. He said some things which lead me to believe that Coach will have a much firmer hand on this year's squad. I'm a bit more optimistic, though still worried about the o-line and offensive backfield.

I don't wanna win shootouts. I want our D to avg giving up 13.2 per game, something nicely quite low.
Defensive scoring; safeties, pick sixes and returns for TDs would be great too.
Showing Messages: 1 - 13 of 13
reply
vertical_align_top
vertical_align_center
vertical_align_bottom
add_comment
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)