Ohio Football Topic
Topic: Does the OHIO bowl streak continue this year?
Page: 1 of 1
The Optimist
General User
Member Since: 3/16/2007
Location: CLE
Post Count: 5,611
mail
The Optimist
mail
Posted: 6/1/2014 8:43 AM
colobobcat66
General User
C66
Member Since: 9/1/2006
Location: Watching the bobcats run outside my window., CO
Post Count: 4,744
person
mail
colobobcat66
mail
Posted: 6/1/2014 10:13 AM
I'm guessing not. I think we will be lucky to get to 5 wins unless the offense is better than indicated. With all the new bowls, 6 wins should be a lock for a bowl, but I don't know where the wins are coming from. Being realistic, Marshall, BG and Kentucky appear to be almost for sure losses, we don't play UMass, and Miami and Akron are going to be better.
Monroe Slavin
General User
MS
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121
person
mail
Monroe Slavin
mail
Posted: 6/1/2014 12:16 PM
I thimk and hope that what dogged us the last year or so is gone.  If not, few wins.  If so, certainly 6-7 wins and probably more.
cbarber357
General User
C357
Member Since: 9/10/2012
Location: Pickerington, OH
Post Count: 1,159
person
mail
cbarber357
mail
Posted: 6/1/2014 12:18 PM
I don't get why anyone is under the impression that Kentucky is any good. They're terrible. Our team this year is pretty unproven on offense, but I don't think they'll be terrible.
A-townBound
General User
Member Since: 3/31/2012
Location: Georgetown, KY
Post Count: 672
mail
A-townBound
mail
Posted: 6/1/2014 12:29 PM
cbarber357 wrote:expand_more
I don't get why anyone is under the impression that Kentucky is any good. They're terrible. Our team this year is pretty unproven on offense, but I don't think they'll be terrible.
+1 I'm not saying a win over KY is a lock, but they are definitely terrible. Even UK fans here acknowledge that fact, and a few have told me they believe we will win.
Last Edited: 6/1/2014 12:30:19 PM by A-townBound
TheBobcatBandit
General User
Member Since: 8/25/2013
Post Count: 618
mail
TheBobcatBandit
mail
Posted: 6/1/2014 7:56 PM
Agreed I think we'll go 7-5 hopefully higher. Kentucky lost to Western Kentucky last year. Who is a small school similar to us so I see no reason why we can't win
colobobcat66
General User
C66
Member Since: 9/1/2006
Location: Watching the bobcats run outside my window., CO
Post Count: 4,744
person
mail
colobobcat66
mail
Posted: 6/1/2014 8:15 PM
TheBobcatBandit wrote:expand_more
Agreed I think we'll go 7-5 hopefully higher. Kentucky lost to Western Kentucky last year. Who is a small school similar to us so I see no reason why we can't win

How about 14 4 star guys showing up and contributing? I'm not real big on freshmen doing much, but I wish I had these guys here.
Alan Swank
General User
AS
Member Since: 12/12/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 7,375
person
mail
Alan Swank
mail
Posted: 6/1/2014 9:38 PM
The Optimist wrote:expand_more


Many of these bowls are nothing more than a trophy for everyone.  Meaningless and a drain on valuable resources.  Let's win the MAC and we'll all have something meaningful to celebrate.
OrlandoCat
General User
OC
Member Since: 3/15/2005
Post Count: 355
person
mail
OrlandoCat
mail
Posted: 6/1/2014 10:11 PM
Alan Swank wrote:expand_more
Many of these bowls are nothing more than a trophy for everyone.  Meaningless and a drain on valuable resources.  Let's win the MAC and we'll all have something meaningful to celebrate.

I'll chalk this up to the growing list of things that would never had been said on this board in 2005

 
Athens
General User
A
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Alexandria, VA
Post Count: 5,454
person
mail
Athens
mail
Posted: 6/1/2014 11:04 PM
Alan Swank wrote:expand_more


Many of these bowls are nothing more than a trophy for everyone.  Meaningless and a drain on valuable resources.  Let's win the MAC and we'll all have something meaningful to celebrate.

That is becoming more true every year. In the days when there was only 12 bowl games it was a big accomplishment and only the MAC Champion earned a bowl. You needed a winning record to land in a bowl and it was all about how many tickets you could sell, not the conference arrangement. Making 5 straight bowls out of the MAC does say something because only 4-5 schools are bowling most years. In the Big Ten with 10 bowl games it doesn't say anything if you're making a bowl every year with so many of them. Its the same way in basketball. For a MAC school to be in the NIT, CIT, CBI or whatever its significant because you need 20+ wins out of the MAC to do that. 20 basketball wins in the Big Ten will land you a spot in the NCAAs. A 10-2 season in MAC football makes you a favorite in a lower tier bowl game. Go 10-2 in the Big Ten and it lands you a BCS bowl. 

 
Athens
General User
A
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Alexandria, VA
Post Count: 5,454
person
mail
Athens
mail
Posted: 6/1/2014 11:16 PM
A-townBound wrote:expand_more
I don't get why anyone is under the impression that Kentucky is any good. They're terrible. Our team this year is pretty unproven on offense, but I don't think they'll be terrible.


+1 I'm not saying a win over KY is a lock, but they are definitely terrible. Even UK fans here acknowledge that fact, and a few have told me they believe we will win.

One thing that hurts schools like Kentucky in a game against a school like Ohio is when you're a losing program you don't have confidence. I would put this game in the toss up category along with Marshall (we have their number), BG (looks like the class of the league but we have them at home), NIU (have them at home). Getting that win to start the season against Kent State is going to be a big factor in whether we end up 5-7 or 7-5 or better. For the first time in about a decade with BG there is a dominant team besides us. Temple had a nice run for a few years there but was never true MAC championship caliber. BG at homecoming is going to be a monster game. 

 
GoCats105
General User
GC105
Member Since: 1/31/2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Post Count: 7,823
person
mail
GoCats105
mail
Posted: 6/2/2014 8:48 AM
cbarber357 wrote:expand_more
I don't get why anyone is under the impression that Kentucky is any good. They're terrible. Our team this year is pretty unproven on offense, but I don't think they'll be terrible.


Umm, because it's the SEC and it's a different class of football. UK has one of their best recruiting classes ever coming in and Stoops is coaching the older guys up. Kent State thought the same thing back in 2012 and got throttled 47-14 by a team that finished 2-10 that year. BTW, that was the same Kent team that went to the MAC title game.
OUcats82
General User
Member Since: 1/9/2005
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Post Count: 1,912
mail
OUcats82
mail
Posted: 6/2/2014 8:57 AM
Uncle Wes wrote:expand_more
I don't get why anyone is under the impression that Kentucky is any good. They're terrible. Our team this year is pretty unproven on offense, but I don't think they'll be terrible.


+1 I'm not saying a win over KY is a lock, but they are definitely terrible. Even UK fans here acknowledge that fact, and a few have told me they believe we will win.

One thing that hurts schools like Kentucky in a game against a school like Ohio is when you're a losing program you don't have confidence. I would put this game in the toss up category along with Marshall (we have their number), BG (looks like the class of the league but we have them at home), NIU (have them at home). Getting that win to start the season against Kent State is going to be a big factor in whether we end up 5-7 or 7-5 or better. For the first time in about a decade with BG there is a dominant team besides us. Temple had a nice run for a few years there but was never true MAC championship caliber. BG at homecoming is going to be a monster game. 

 

That first game against Kent is going to be big for us IMHO.  They have had our number for the past several years (have eaten our lunch frankly) and I think that a win over them will go a long way for our team psyche. While I am not a big fan of opening a season against a conference foe it's probably best to play them to start before our annual rash of injuries.   

 
cbarber357
General User
C357
Member Since: 9/10/2012
Location: Pickerington, OH
Post Count: 1,159
person
mail
cbarber357
mail
Posted: 6/2/2014 12:23 PM
GoCats105 wrote:expand_more
I don't get why anyone is under the impression that Kentucky is any good. They're terrible. Our team this year is pretty unproven on offense, but I don't think they'll be terrible.


Umm, because it's the SEC and it's a different class of football. UK has one of their best recruiting classes ever coming in and Stoops is coaching the older guys up. Kent State thought the same thing back in 2012 and got throttled 47-14 by a team that finished 2-10 that year. BTW, that was the same Kent team that went to the MAC title game.

I'm not claiming a win, but being in the SEC means nothing. It is the best conference in football, but nobody pays attention to the fact that half the teams are still average at best most years (Vandy,, Kentucky, Tennessee, Arkansas in recent years, Mississippi State, etc.) it's not like they're a top 25 team or even close. A bunch of Freshman don't mean much and Mark Stoops is a first time head coach with an all time record of 2-10 with an overrated last name.

Why are they any scarier than NIU, BGSU, or Marshall?
colobobcat66
General User
C66
Member Since: 9/1/2006
Location: Watching the bobcats run outside my window., CO
Post Count: 4,744
person
mail
colobobcat66
mail
Posted: 6/2/2014 2:31 PM
cbarber357 wrote:expand_more
I don't get why anyone is under the impression that Kentucky is any good. They're terrible. Our team this year is pretty unproven on offense, but I don't think they'll be terrible.


Umm, because it's the SEC and it's a different class of football. UK has one of their best recruiting classes ever coming in and Stoops is coaching the older guys up. Kent State thought the same thing back in 2012 and got throttled 47-14 by a team that finished 2-10 that year. BTW, that was the same Kent team that went to the MAC title game.

I'm not claiming a win, but being in the SEC means nothing. It is the best conference in football, but nobody pays attention to the fact that half the teams are still average at best most years (Vandy,, Kentucky, Tennessee, Arkansas in recent years, Mississippi State, etc.) it's not like they're a top 25 team or even close. A bunch of Freshman don't mean much and Mark Stoops is a first time head coach with an all time record of 2-10 with an overrated last name.

Why are they any scarier than NIU, BGSU, or Marshall?

I wouldn't say that being in the SEC means nothing. It means they have pretty good facilities, a good fan base and an attractive place for recruits to be drawn to. Ok, Kentucky is a basketball school and has to overcome that with their fan base. Arkansas and Tennessee have seen the top 25 in their pasts and are undergoing new coach pains. As mentioned above, Kentucky had a great recruiting class last year and will be more competitive as those players mature.
While I don't think that they are any "scarier" than the teams named, I wouldn't be surprised to see similar scores versus them as well.
Showing Messages: 1 - 15 of 15
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)