menu
Logo
99+
Bobcat Attack Menu
Logo
99+
Ohio Football Topic
Topic: OT: The Big Two
Page: 1 of 1
GoCats105
General User
GC105
Member Since: 1/31/2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Post Count: 7,811
person
mail
GoCats105
mail
Posted: 9/30/2024 12:48 PM
settings_applications edit_note
There is no longer a Power Five or a Group of Five. It's the Big Two: The Big Ten and The SEC, and then everyone else. As if we needed any further evidence that this sport is about to become a shell of its former self, look no further than this:

https://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/41531125...

In summation, the Big Ten and SEC are working on a partnership that would give each conference four automatic bids to the CFP. That leaves 4 total for the rest of the country. They're also attempting to organize a scheduling partnership, which mostly hinges on the SEC's marriage to a 4 game non-conference schedule. They're also exploring eliminating the CFP selection committee or at least limiting its role.
colobobcat66
General User
C66
Member Since: 9/1/2006
Location: Watching the bobcats run outside my window., CO
Post Count: 4,744
person
mail
colobobcat66
mail
Posted: 9/30/2024 1:19 PM
settings_applications edit_note
GoCats105 wrote:expand_more
There is no longer a Power Five or a Group of Five. It's the Big Two: The Big Ten and The SEC, and then everyone else. As if we needed any further evidence that this sport is about to become a shell of its former self, look no further than this:

https://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/41531125...

In summation, the Big Ten and SEC are working on a partnership that would give each conference four automatic bids to the CFP. That leaves 4 total for the rest of the country. They're also attempting to organize a scheduling partnership, which mostly hinges on the SEC's marriage to a 4 game non-conference schedule. They're also exploring eliminating the CFP selection committee or at least limiting its role.
Why don’t they just go ahead and join the NFL as 2 new divisions ?
Bobcat Love
General User
BL
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Post Count: 1,193
person
mail
Bobcat Love
mail
Posted: 9/30/2024 2:12 PM
settings_applications edit_note
You think Purdue is part of the Big 2? Vanderbilt? Northwestern? Iowa? Mississippi State? Auburn?

Lol. Wake up. This is far from over.
GoCats105
General User
GC105
Member Since: 1/31/2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Post Count: 7,811
person
mail
GoCats105
mail
Posted: 9/30/2024 2:26 PM
settings_applications edit_note
Bobcat Love wrote:expand_more
You think Purdue is part of the Big 2? Vanderbilt? Northwestern? Iowa? Mississippi State? Auburn?

Lol. Wake up. This is far from over.
That's definitely the next step. They're looking for helmet games, and Purdue and Vanderbilt aren't helmet games.
M.D.W.S.T
General User
Member Since: 12/24/2021
Post Count: 3,658
mail
M.D.W.S.T
mail
Posted: 9/30/2024 2:28 PM
settings_applications edit_note
We're about 4 months from the SUPERBIGNORTHSOUTH CONFERENCE when these two combine.
Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame
General User
BLSS
Member Since: 7/30/2010
Post Count: 4,646
person
mail
Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame
mail
Posted: 9/30/2024 2:41 PM
settings_applications edit_note
I said this a while back, and still think that college football will end up looking something like the Premier League in England.

There'll be a top tier of the richest schools, unconstrained by geography, with a single TV deal, revenue share model, and that what we're seeing is a gradual culling of the folks that don't contribute financially. To the extent there are conferences, they'll mainly just be about historical rivalries and regular season scheduling.

The other folks need to hope there's some sort of relegation and promotional system, and the OU's of the world need to get serious about a business model that isn't so reliant and handouts from the P5. The NCAA's settlement and the fact that 22% of athletic revenue's going to athletes now is about to make the P5 far, far less interested in having a bunch of G5 schools suckling at their teat.
Last Edited: 9/30/2024 2:54:43 PM by Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame
JimLurker34
General User
JL34
Member Since: 12/7/2023
Location: McArthur, OH
Post Count: 259
person
mail
JimLurker34
mail
Posted: 9/30/2024 5:46 PM
settings_applications edit_note
GoCats105 wrote:expand_more
There is no longer a Power Five or a Group of Five. It's the Big Two: The Big Ten and The SEC, and then everyone else. As if we needed any further evidence that this sport is about to become a shell of its former self, look no further than this:

https://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/41531125...

In summation, the Big Ten and SEC are working on a partnership that would give each conference four automatic bids to the CFP. That leaves 4 total for the rest of the country. They're also attempting to organize a scheduling partnership, which mostly hinges on the SEC's marriage to a 4 game non-conference schedule. They're also exploring eliminating the CFP selection committee or at least limiting its role.
If this happens, I think I'll go back to caring more about the TVC than the MAC, or any other college football conference. This reminds me of Hitler who wasn't satisfied with just taking over parts of Germany lost in WWI, but then took over Austria, France and, then, blunder of blunders decided to invade the USSR. Sometimes you can bite off more than you can chew.
Pataskala
General User
P
Member Since: 7/8/2010
Location: At least six feet away from anybody else
Post Count: 9,465
person
mail
Pataskala
mail
Posted: 9/30/2024 6:18 PM
settings_applications edit_note
Four auto bids looks like something that the Antitrust Division of the DOJ might be interested in. You've got two conferences using their market power to impede competition. It at least sounds like something that would draw Congressional pressure from states that don't have a B10 or SEC team yet, e.g., New York, Massachusetts, West Virginia, Colorado, Arizona, Utah. They're potentially opening a big can of worms here.
BillyTheCat
General User
BTC
Member Since: 10/6/2012
Post Count: 10,793
person
mail
BillyTheCat
mail
Posted: 10/2/2024 7:34 AM
settings_applications edit_note
Pataskala wrote:expand_more
Four auto bids looks like something that the Antitrust Division of the DOJ might be interested in. You've got two conferences using their market power to impede competition. It at least sounds like something that would draw Congressional pressure from states that don't have a B10 or SEC team yet, e.g., New York, Massachusetts, West Virginia, Colorado, Arizona, Utah. They're potentially opening a big can of worms here.
They are going to get 4 without having to make them mandatory. Rewind several years ago, when many on this board thought a playoff and then expanded playoff would be good for the Mids by giving us a chance.
M.D.W.S.T
General User
Member Since: 12/24/2021
Post Count: 3,658
mail
M.D.W.S.T
mail
Posted: 10/2/2024 9:55 AM
settings_applications edit_note
BillyTheCat wrote:expand_more
Four auto bids looks like something that the Antitrust Division of the DOJ might be interested in. You've got two conferences using their market power to impede competition. It at least sounds like something that would draw Congressional pressure from states that don't have a B10 or SEC team yet, e.g., New York, Massachusetts, West Virginia, Colorado, Arizona, Utah. They're potentially opening a big can of worms here.
They are going to get 4 without having to make them mandatory. Rewind several years ago, when many on this board thought a playoff and then expanded playoff would be good for the Mids by giving us a chance.
If we kept last seasons team intact this season, I think we would have a really good chance at making the playoff.
greencat
General User
Member Since: 3/13/2005
Post Count: 2,835
mail
greencat
mail
Posted: 10/2/2024 3:01 PM
settings_applications edit_note
They could replace the AFC South which Alabama could win this year.
BillyTheCat
General User
BTC
Member Since: 10/6/2012
Post Count: 10,793
person
mail
BillyTheCat
mail
Posted: 10/5/2024 7:44 PM
settings_applications edit_note
greencat wrote:expand_more
They could replace the AFC South which Alabama could win this year.
You must really be a fan of legalization of drugs in Ohio. Either that, or you are a poor comedian. Because Alabama couldn’t beat the worse NFL team.
OhioCatFan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 15,672
mail
OhioCatFan
mail
Posted: 10/6/2024 10:21 AM
settings_applications edit_note
BillyTheCat wrote:expand_more
They could replace the AFC South which Alabama could win this year.
You must really be a fan of legalization of drugs in Ohio. Either that, or you are a poor comedian. Because Alabama couldn’t beat the worse NFL team.
Heck, they can’t even beat Vanderbilt.
BSC 91
General User
B91
Member Since: 4/22/2022
Post Count: 29
person
mail
BSC 91
mail
Posted: 10/9/2024 1:27 PM
settings_applications edit_note
Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame wrote:expand_more
I said this a while back, and still think that college football will end up looking something like the Premier League in England.

There'll be a top tier of the richest schools, unconstrained by geography, with a single TV deal, revenue share model, and that what we're seeing is a gradual culling of the folks that don't contribute financially. To the extent there are conferences, they'll mainly just be about historical rivalries and regular season scheduling.

The other folks need to hope there's some sort of relegation and promotional system, and the OU's of the world need to get serious about a business model that isn't so reliant and handouts from the P5. The NCAA's settlement and the fact that 22% of athletic revenue's going to athletes now is about to make the P5 far, far less interested in having a bunch of G5 schools suckling at their teat.
That would be fun, but promotion/relegation would never happen. None of the schools who would start out in this new top tier would ever vote for the possibility that they'd get relegated. Kind of like MLS is now, and that proposed soccer "Super League" that didn't happen.
Showing Messages: 1 - 14 of 14
reply
vertical_align_top
vertical_align_center
vertical_align_bottom
add_comment
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)