Ohio Football Topic
Topic: TURNOVERS
Page: 1 of 1
Casper71
General User
C71
Member Since: 12/1/2006
Post Count: 3,237
person
mail
Casper71
mail
Posted: 9/28/2014 12:17 AM
Anybody worried about the fact that we have forced 0 fumbles in the first 4 games and have just 4 INT with 3 of them being by one guy in one game? I know we got the first blocked punt in 4 years today but it seems to me we need to force a lot more turnovers now that MAC play is beginning. Could it be the emphasis this year is on tackling rather than stripping the ball? Just looking for thoughts...
Last Edited: 9/28/2014 12:17:29 AM by Casper71
71 BOBCAT
General User
71B
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Post Count: 1,954
person
mail
71 BOBCAT
mail
Posted: 9/28/2014 8:24 AM
I'm with you on this issue.






GO BOBCATS
C Money
General User
Member Since: 8/28/2010
Post Count: 3,420
mail
C Money
mail
Posted: 9/28/2014 9:24 AM
I'm more concerned about the turnovers we're giving up than the turnovers we're not creating.
Bcat2
General User
B2
Member Since: 7/6/2010
Post Count: 4,295
person
mail
Bcat2
mail
Posted: 9/28/2014 9:38 AM
C Money wrote:expand_more
I'm more concerned about the turnovers we're giving up than the turnovers we're not creating.
With you on this.
L.C.
General User
LC
Member Since: 9/1/2005
Post Count: 10,584
person
mail
L.C.
mail
Posted: 9/28/2014 9:47 AM
Casper71 wrote:expand_more
Anybody worried about the fact that we have forced 0 fumbles in the first 4 games and have just 4 INT with 3 of them being by one guy in one game? I know we got the first blocked punt in 4 years today but it seems to me we need to force a lot more turnovers now that MAC play is beginning. Could it be the emphasis this year is on tackling rather than stripping the ball? Just looking for thoughts...

Casper, I think you nailed it. I think that the emphasis is on tackling, which I think is much better than in prior years. Personally, I like it. I hate seeing a guy going for a strip, and then missing a tackle in the process. Think about the silly effort the EIU guy made, trying to strip AJ at the end of his long run. I'll take more stops and a few less turnovers. I still think that we'll see some balls on the ground before the year is over. Part of it is luck, too.
Mark Lembright '85
General User
ML85
Member Since: 8/22/2010
Location: Highland Heights, OH
Post Count: 2,460
person
mail
Mark Lembright '85
mail
Posted: 9/28/2014 10:34 AM
C Money wrote:expand_more
I'm more concerned about the turnovers we're giving up than the turnovers we're not creating.
B-I-N-G-O! Couldn't agree more. For Ohio to have any shot of winning the MAC East this year Ohio must be on the plus side of the turnover margin. Of course, with this team's youth/inexperience on offense that will be hard to do.
Pataskala
General User
P
Member Since: 7/8/2010
Location: At least six feet away from anybody else
Post Count: 9,465
person
mail
Pataskala
mail
Posted: 9/28/2014 11:26 AM
Mark Lembright '85 wrote:expand_more
I'm more concerned about the turnovers we're giving up than the turnovers we're not creating.
B-I-N-G-O! Couldn't agree more. For Ohio to have any shot of winning the MAC East this year Ohio must be on the plus side of the turnover margin. Of course, with this team's youth/inexperience on offense that will be hard to do.
So far the D has responded well when we turn it over. EIU scored a TD off the first INT, which makes 14 points that we've given up off nine turnovers this season. That's a VERY good result. You're going to have turnovers with a young team, so it's up to the D to make sure they don't hurt much. As for takeaways, Solich mentioned a couple weeks ago that he'd like to see the D go for the ball more. Not necessarily the first guy in, but certainly the second and third.
Urban Bobcat
General User
UB
Member Since: 9/14/2007
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 857
person
mail
Urban Bobcat
mail
Posted: 9/28/2014 12:15 PM
Pataskala wrote:expand_more
I'm more concerned about the turnovers we're giving up than the turnovers we're not creating.
B-I-N-G-O! Couldn't agree more. For Ohio to have any shot of winning the MAC East this year Ohio must be on the plus side of the turnover margin. Of course, with this team's youth/inexperience on offense that will be hard to do.
So far the D has responded well when we turn it over. EIU scored a TD off the first INT, which makes 14 points that we've given up off nine turnovers this season. That's a VERY good result. You're going to have turnovers with a young team, so it's up to the D to make sure they don't hurt much. As for takeaways, Solich mentioned a couple weeks ago that he'd like to see the D go for the ball more. Not necessarily the first guy in, but certainly the second and third.
The bottom line is this is a young team. I just hope they continue to improve down the line.
Showing Messages: 1 - 8 of 8
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)