menu
Logo
99+
Bobcat Attack Menu
Logo
99+
Ohio Football Topic
Topic: Laseak suspended for 1st half vs. Akron
Page: 1 of 1
Brufus
General User
B
Member Since: 12/13/2011
Location: Wherever Miami and Michigan suck
Post Count: 439
person
mail
Brufus
mail
Posted: 10/13/2014 7:59 PM
settings_applications edit_note
Per an Arkley tweet; I had a feeling it was gonna be either a half or the whole game
Deciduous Forest Cat
General User
DFC
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: OH
Post Count: 4,559
person
mail
Deciduous Forest Cat
mail
Posted: 10/13/2014 8:24 PM
settings_applications edit_note
By the NCAA, the MAC or by Solich?
Pataskala
General User
P
Member Since: 7/8/2010
Location: At least six feet away from anybody else
Post Count: 9,465
person
mail
Pataskala
mail
Posted: 10/13/2014 8:47 PM
settings_applications edit_note
NCAA rules. If the punch had occurred in the first half, he would be eligible for all of the Akron game. But a second half ejection means the player sits the first half of the next game.
bobcat695
General User
B695
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Parkersburg, WV
Post Count: 1,345
person
mail
bobcat695
mail
Posted: 10/13/2014 9:02 PM
settings_applications edit_note
I just watched the replay of that part of the game. As ridiculous as it sounds, I think he was just trying to punch the ball. There is no camera angle to verify or deny that, but it didn't look like he was throwing haymakers at someone. I don't have a problem with the call, but watching the replay doesn't make me think he was blatantly malicious.
L.C.
General User
LC
Member Since: 9/1/2005
Post Count: 10,584
person
mail
L.C.
mail
Posted: 10/13/2014 9:14 PM
settings_applications edit_note
bobcat695 wrote:expand_more
I just watched the replay of that part of the game. As ridiculous as it sounds, I think he was just trying to punch the ball. There is no camera angle to verify or deny that, but it didn't look like he was throwing haymakers at someone. I don't have a problem with the call, but watching the replay doesn't make me think he was blatantly malicious.

I agree, but the stupid thing about the play was that, even if he had knocked the ball loose, the player was already on the ground, and there is no way it could have been ruled a fumble.
Bcat2
General User
B2
Member Since: 7/6/2010
Post Count: 4,295
person
mail
Bcat2
mail
Posted: 10/14/2014 6:50 AM
settings_applications edit_note
L.C. wrote:expand_more
I just watched the replay of that part of the game. As ridiculous as it sounds, I think he was just trying to punch the ball. There is no camera angle to verify or deny that, but it didn't look like he was throwing haymakers at someone. I don't have a problem with the call, but watching the replay doesn't make me think he was blatantly malicious.

I agree, but the stupid thing about the play was that, even if he had knocked the ball loose, the player was already on the ground, and there is no way it could have been ruled a fumble.
DE is a position from which you would not want to miss time. There are some young studs who are just hoping for their turn.
Last Edited: 10/14/2014 6:51:40 AM by Bcat2
Showing Messages: 1 - 6 of 6
reply
vertical_align_top
vertical_align_center
vertical_align_bottom
add_comment
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)