WOW. Just wow.
We lost 31-13 dude. We beat ourselves? I guess we didn't just beat ourselves...we kicked the crap out of ourselves.
Actually, after the first 1:07, Ohio totally dominated the game in all ways but one. That one, however, is the key one, the ability to put the ball into the endzone. After the horrid start, where BG was up 14-0 in 67 seconds, BG could do very little offensively and most drives ended in a 3 and out. They had only three times in the entire rest of the game where they moved the ball more than 25 yards in a drive, however those three times resulted in 2 TDs and a FG.
Meanwhile, Ohio had drive after drive, numerous of which resulted in no points. In the end, over the last 59 minutes, Ohio gained 499 yards, while BG gained 243, but even over the last 59 minutes BG won 17-13 because Ohio just couldn't get into the endzone. You can't come from behind if you don't get into the endzone.
If you look only at the scoreboard, BG dominated. If you look at the actual game itself, it tells another story. In my mind, that game was the turning point, especially for the defense. The only team after that that really burned the defense was WMU. Other than WMU, the defense was impressive the rest of the way. The yards gained against BG was really the best offensive show up to that point, but the offense needed to finish drives, and most importantly, the team needed to learn that they could come from behind and win.
No, Ohio didn't "nearly win", but they certainly played some of the aspects of the game well enough to win, and they made some major improvements in other areas.
As I said above, to me that game marks the turning point. Ohio did a lot more things right against BG than they did against CMU, Marshall, or Kentucky.