I specifically asked a team staffer if they'd ever consider speeding up the pace of plays/snaps and he replied, "I hope not. It's a big part of why we're successful offensively."
I should have asked why but didn't. Can anyone explain this to me?
It's not like they are just killing time. During long snap count, the QB is surveying the defense, and making a decision about whether to audible into another play that might work better. The fact that they audible as much as they do is part of why a QB new to the system often doesn't become successful immediately.
It IS like they're killing time though. Routinely snapping it with 1-2 seconds is a hallmark of the Albin-era. Hell, what was his formula he said? The fewer the plays they run the better chance they have to win? Holy shit.
I'm not doubting it as much this season, for a lot of obvious reasons, but I do question - like I said, it's an Albin philosophy - Rourke didn't need the extra time, we held him back. ExCat mentioned keeping Toledo on their heals a bit, and I agree. The more time you take, the more time you give the DEFENSE time to rest and think about whats about to happen. I'm not saying we need to run to the line and quick snap it, but Albin has always been a clock bleeder - and to my biggest gripe about him he doesn't try to hammer a decisive victory, he tries to bleed it out and hopefully not lose.